Aquinas' Counterfactual Incarnations
This paper is an examination of Aquinas’ account of the various ways in which the Incarnation might have occurred. Aquinas maintains that the Son of God became incarnate by assuming a specific body/soul union. Although he maintains that it was fitting for God to have become incarnate in this manner...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
Catholic University of Louvain
2025-04-01
|
| Series: | TheoLogica |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ojs.uclouvain.be/index.php/theologica/article/view/67803 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850184677923487744 |
|---|---|
| author | Christopher Hughes Conn |
| author_facet | Christopher Hughes Conn |
| author_sort | Christopher Hughes Conn |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
This paper is an examination of Aquinas’ account of the various ways in which the Incarnation might have occurred. Aquinas maintains that the Son of God became incarnate by assuming a specific body/soul union. Although he maintains that it was fitting for God to have become incarnate in this manner, he contends (i) that any one of the three divine persons could have become incarnate in this manner, (ii) that any plurality of these Persons could have assumed the same body/soul union, (iii) that any plurality of these Persons could have assumed distinct body/soul unions, and (iv) that any of the divine persons could have assumed a plurality of body/soul unions. Given the increasingly bizarre nature of these scenarios, it is worth asking, first, whether Aquinas is rationally entitled to these modal judgments, and second, why he is advancing them so early in his Discourse on the Incarnation in the Summa theologiae. In this paper I contend, first, that these counterfactual scenarios are possible if his actual account is possible; and second, that these scenarios they shed light (i) on the manner in which the Son of God did become incarnate, (ii) on the nature and scope of God’s freedom, love and power, and (iii) on Aquinas’ relationship with Rahner’s Rule, viz., the thesis that the economic Trinity is identical with the immanent Trinity.
|
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-7b0b5b3b6fff4fc19aa99bde8801562c |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 2593-0265 |
| language | deu |
| publishDate | 2025-04-01 |
| publisher | Catholic University of Louvain |
| record_format | Article |
| series | TheoLogica |
| spelling | doaj-art-7b0b5b3b6fff4fc19aa99bde8801562c2025-08-20T02:16:59ZdeuCatholic University of LouvainTheoLogica2593-02652025-04-019110.14428/thl.v9i1.67803Aquinas' Counterfactual IncarnationsChristopher Hughes Conn0The University of the South This paper is an examination of Aquinas’ account of the various ways in which the Incarnation might have occurred. Aquinas maintains that the Son of God became incarnate by assuming a specific body/soul union. Although he maintains that it was fitting for God to have become incarnate in this manner, he contends (i) that any one of the three divine persons could have become incarnate in this manner, (ii) that any plurality of these Persons could have assumed the same body/soul union, (iii) that any plurality of these Persons could have assumed distinct body/soul unions, and (iv) that any of the divine persons could have assumed a plurality of body/soul unions. Given the increasingly bizarre nature of these scenarios, it is worth asking, first, whether Aquinas is rationally entitled to these modal judgments, and second, why he is advancing them so early in his Discourse on the Incarnation in the Summa theologiae. In this paper I contend, first, that these counterfactual scenarios are possible if his actual account is possible; and second, that these scenarios they shed light (i) on the manner in which the Son of God did become incarnate, (ii) on the nature and scope of God’s freedom, love and power, and (iii) on Aquinas’ relationship with Rahner’s Rule, viz., the thesis that the economic Trinity is identical with the immanent Trinity. https://ojs.uclouvain.be/index.php/theologica/article/view/67803AquinasTrinityIncarnationdivine attributes |
| spellingShingle | Christopher Hughes Conn Aquinas' Counterfactual Incarnations TheoLogica Aquinas Trinity Incarnation divine attributes |
| title | Aquinas' Counterfactual Incarnations |
| title_full | Aquinas' Counterfactual Incarnations |
| title_fullStr | Aquinas' Counterfactual Incarnations |
| title_full_unstemmed | Aquinas' Counterfactual Incarnations |
| title_short | Aquinas' Counterfactual Incarnations |
| title_sort | aquinas counterfactual incarnations |
| topic | Aquinas Trinity Incarnation divine attributes |
| url | https://ojs.uclouvain.be/index.php/theologica/article/view/67803 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT christopherhughesconn aquinascounterfactualincarnations |