Eurasian Economic Union: Achievement and Сhallenges of Integration
The question of Eurasian integration is of great interest to politicians and academics for many reasons. First, it is the only existing and developing integration association in the former Soviet Union. Second, this association is valid in the neighbourhood of the European Union. Thirdly, this assoc...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Russian |
| Published: |
Government of the Russian Federation, Financial University
2019-06-01
|
| Series: | Мир новой экономики |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://wne.fa.ru/jour/article/view/204 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850026558090117120 |
|---|---|
| author | L. M. Grigor’ev V. V. Brilliantova V. A. Pavlyushina |
| author_facet | L. M. Grigor’ev V. V. Brilliantova V. A. Pavlyushina |
| author_sort | L. M. Grigor’ev |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The question of Eurasian integration is of great interest to politicians and academics for many reasons. First, it is the only existing and developing integration association in the former Soviet Union. Second, this association is valid in the neighbourhood of the European Union. Thirdly, this association is close to the sphere of important trade and investment interests of China. And finally, it is important that the EAEU was formed after 2014 — the beginning of the “sanctions” period in the life of Russia and the world. Integration in the Eurasian space is a unique case when previously closely interconnected countries within the framework of the central planning system, having survived the collapse of the former economic reality and still being in a protracted transformation process, restore their economic ties in a new market environment. In the case of the CIS, reintegration has not developed for some political reasons, despite available economic conditions. In addition to the analysis of macroeconomic and institutional parameters of the countries, the article presents the results of the classification of the regions of four EAEU countries: Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan. To optimise the cross-country comparison, we simplified the classification by the peculiarities of the administrative division of other EAEU members. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-7aed793cd0ab4d99912a1ad4a71c8f1c |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 2220-6469 2220-7872 |
| language | Russian |
| publishDate | 2019-06-01 |
| publisher | Government of the Russian Federation, Financial University |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Мир новой экономики |
| spelling | doaj-art-7aed793cd0ab4d99912a1ad4a71c8f1c2025-08-20T03:00:30ZrusGovernment of the Russian Federation, Financial UniversityМир новой экономики2220-64692220-78722019-06-0112461910.26794/2220-6469-2018-12-4-6-19195Eurasian Economic Union: Achievement and Сhallenges of IntegrationL. M. Grigor’ev0V. V. Brilliantova1V. A. Pavlyushina2HSE; Analytical centre under the Government of the Russian FederationAnalytical centre under the Government of the Russian FederationHSE Banking Institute; Analytical centre under the Government of the Russian FederationThe question of Eurasian integration is of great interest to politicians and academics for many reasons. First, it is the only existing and developing integration association in the former Soviet Union. Second, this association is valid in the neighbourhood of the European Union. Thirdly, this association is close to the sphere of important trade and investment interests of China. And finally, it is important that the EAEU was formed after 2014 — the beginning of the “sanctions” period in the life of Russia and the world. Integration in the Eurasian space is a unique case when previously closely interconnected countries within the framework of the central planning system, having survived the collapse of the former economic reality and still being in a protracted transformation process, restore their economic ties in a new market environment. In the case of the CIS, reintegration has not developed for some political reasons, despite available economic conditions. In addition to the analysis of macroeconomic and institutional parameters of the countries, the article presents the results of the classification of the regions of four EAEU countries: Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan. To optimise the cross-country comparison, we simplified the classification by the peculiarities of the administrative division of other EAEU members.https://wne.fa.ru/jour/article/view/204eurasian integrationeconomic growthhuman capitalquality of institutionsdoing businessmutual traderegional inequalityspecialisation of the region |
| spellingShingle | L. M. Grigor’ev V. V. Brilliantova V. A. Pavlyushina Eurasian Economic Union: Achievement and Сhallenges of Integration Мир новой экономики eurasian integration economic growth human capital quality of institutions doing business mutual trade regional inequality specialisation of the region |
| title | Eurasian Economic Union: Achievement and Сhallenges of Integration |
| title_full | Eurasian Economic Union: Achievement and Сhallenges of Integration |
| title_fullStr | Eurasian Economic Union: Achievement and Сhallenges of Integration |
| title_full_unstemmed | Eurasian Economic Union: Achievement and Сhallenges of Integration |
| title_short | Eurasian Economic Union: Achievement and Сhallenges of Integration |
| title_sort | eurasian economic union achievement and сhallenges of integration |
| topic | eurasian integration economic growth human capital quality of institutions doing business mutual trade regional inequality specialisation of the region |
| url | https://wne.fa.ru/jour/article/view/204 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT lmgrigorev eurasianeconomicunionachievementandshallengesofintegration AT vvbrilliantova eurasianeconomicunionachievementandshallengesofintegration AT vapavlyushina eurasianeconomicunionachievementandshallengesofintegration |