Techniques for capturing bighorn sheep lambs

ABSTRACT Low lamb recruitment is a major challenge facing managers attempting to mitigate the decline of bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis), and investigations into the underlying mechanisms are limited because of the inability to readily capture and monitor bighorn sheep lambs. We evaluated 4 capture...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joshua B. Smith, Daniel P. Walsh, Elise J. Goldstein, Zachary D. Parsons, Rebekah C. Karsch, Julie R. Stiver, James W. Cain Iii, Kenneth J. Raedeke, Jonathan A. Jenks
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2014-03-01
Series:Wildlife Society Bulletin
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.360
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850064388714659840
author Joshua B. Smith
Daniel P. Walsh
Elise J. Goldstein
Zachary D. Parsons
Rebekah C. Karsch
Julie R. Stiver
James W. Cain Iii
Kenneth J. Raedeke
Jonathan A. Jenks
author_facet Joshua B. Smith
Daniel P. Walsh
Elise J. Goldstein
Zachary D. Parsons
Rebekah C. Karsch
Julie R. Stiver
James W. Cain Iii
Kenneth J. Raedeke
Jonathan A. Jenks
author_sort Joshua B. Smith
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Low lamb recruitment is a major challenge facing managers attempting to mitigate the decline of bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis), and investigations into the underlying mechanisms are limited because of the inability to readily capture and monitor bighorn sheep lambs. We evaluated 4 capture techniques for bighorn sheep lambs: 1) hand‐capture of lambs from radiocollared adult females fitted with vaginal implant transmitters (VITs), 2) hand‐capture of lambs of intensively monitored radiocollared adult females, 3) helicopter net‐gunning, and 4) hand‐capture of lambs from helicopters. During 2010–2012, we successfully captured 90% of lambs from females that retained VITs to ≤1 day of parturition, although we noted differences in capture rates between an area of high road density in the Black Hills (92–100%) of South Dakota, USA, and less accessible areas of New Mexico (71%), USA. Retention of VITs was 78% with pre‐partum expulsion the main cause of failure. We were less likely to capture lambs from females that expelled VITs ≥1 day of parturition (range = 80–83%) or females that were collared without VITs (range = 60–78%). We used helicopter net‐gunning at several sites in 1999, 2001–2002, and 2011, and it proved a useful technique; however, at one site, attempts to capture lambs led to lamb predation by golden eagles (Aquila chrysaetos). We attempted helicopter hand‐captures at one site in 1999, and they also were successful in certain circumstances and avoided risk of physical trauma from net‐gunning; however, application was limited. In areas of low accessibility or if personnel lack the ability to monitor females and/or VITs for extended periods, helicopter capture may provide a viable option for lamb capture. © 2013 The Wildlife Society.
format Article
id doaj-art-7aebda216b99449a8afec7eeda75612d
institution DOAJ
issn 2328-5540
language English
publishDate 2014-03-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Wildlife Society Bulletin
spelling doaj-art-7aebda216b99449a8afec7eeda75612d2025-08-20T02:49:19ZengWileyWildlife Society Bulletin2328-55402014-03-0138116517410.1002/wsb.360Techniques for capturing bighorn sheep lambsJoshua B. Smith0Daniel P. Walsh1Elise J. Goldstein2Zachary D. Parsons3Rebekah C. Karsch4Julie R. Stiver5James W. Cain Iii6Kenneth J. Raedeke7Jonathan A. Jenks8Department of Natural Resource ManagementSouth Dakota State UniversityBrookingsSD57007USAColorado Parks and Wildlife317W Prospect RoadFort CollinsCO80526USACollege of Forest ResourcesUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWA98195USADepartment of Ecosystem and Conservation SciencesUniversity of MontanaMissoulaMT59812USADepartment of Fish, Wildlife, and Conservation EcologyNew Mexico State UniversityLas CrucesNM88003USAColorado Parks and Wildlife4255 Sinton RoadColorado SpringsCO80907USAUnited States Geological Survey, New Mexico Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Conservation EcologyNew Mexico State UniversityLas CrucesNM88003USACollege of Forest ResourcesUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWA98195USADepartment of Natural Resource ManagementSouth Dakota State UniversityBrookingsSD57007USAABSTRACT Low lamb recruitment is a major challenge facing managers attempting to mitigate the decline of bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis), and investigations into the underlying mechanisms are limited because of the inability to readily capture and monitor bighorn sheep lambs. We evaluated 4 capture techniques for bighorn sheep lambs: 1) hand‐capture of lambs from radiocollared adult females fitted with vaginal implant transmitters (VITs), 2) hand‐capture of lambs of intensively monitored radiocollared adult females, 3) helicopter net‐gunning, and 4) hand‐capture of lambs from helicopters. During 2010–2012, we successfully captured 90% of lambs from females that retained VITs to ≤1 day of parturition, although we noted differences in capture rates between an area of high road density in the Black Hills (92–100%) of South Dakota, USA, and less accessible areas of New Mexico (71%), USA. Retention of VITs was 78% with pre‐partum expulsion the main cause of failure. We were less likely to capture lambs from females that expelled VITs ≥1 day of parturition (range = 80–83%) or females that were collared without VITs (range = 60–78%). We used helicopter net‐gunning at several sites in 1999, 2001–2002, and 2011, and it proved a useful technique; however, at one site, attempts to capture lambs led to lamb predation by golden eagles (Aquila chrysaetos). We attempted helicopter hand‐captures at one site in 1999, and they also were successful in certain circumstances and avoided risk of physical trauma from net‐gunning; however, application was limited. In areas of low accessibility or if personnel lack the ability to monitor females and/or VITs for extended periods, helicopter capture may provide a viable option for lamb capture. © 2013 The Wildlife Society.https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.360bighorn sheepcapturehelicopterlambsneonatesnetgun
spellingShingle Joshua B. Smith
Daniel P. Walsh
Elise J. Goldstein
Zachary D. Parsons
Rebekah C. Karsch
Julie R. Stiver
James W. Cain Iii
Kenneth J. Raedeke
Jonathan A. Jenks
Techniques for capturing bighorn sheep lambs
Wildlife Society Bulletin
bighorn sheep
capture
helicopter
lambs
neonates
netgun
title Techniques for capturing bighorn sheep lambs
title_full Techniques for capturing bighorn sheep lambs
title_fullStr Techniques for capturing bighorn sheep lambs
title_full_unstemmed Techniques for capturing bighorn sheep lambs
title_short Techniques for capturing bighorn sheep lambs
title_sort techniques for capturing bighorn sheep lambs
topic bighorn sheep
capture
helicopter
lambs
neonates
netgun
url https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.360
work_keys_str_mv AT joshuabsmith techniquesforcapturingbighornsheeplambs
AT danielpwalsh techniquesforcapturingbighornsheeplambs
AT elisejgoldstein techniquesforcapturingbighornsheeplambs
AT zacharydparsons techniquesforcapturingbighornsheeplambs
AT rebekahckarsch techniquesforcapturingbighornsheeplambs
AT julierstiver techniquesforcapturingbighornsheeplambs
AT jameswcainiii techniquesforcapturingbighornsheeplambs
AT kennethjraedeke techniquesforcapturingbighornsheeplambs
AT jonathanajenks techniquesforcapturingbighornsheeplambs