Silicone Oil Removal With or Without Air–Fluid Exchange: A Retrospective Comparative Study

Abstract Introduction To evaluate whether the air−fluid (A−F) exchange procedure should be recommended for silicone oil (SO) removal surgery. Methods Consecutive patients that underwent SO removal with or without A−F exchange were requested to complete a questionnaire regarding the presence of float...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xin Liu, Meng-Meng Ji, Ling Jin, Ai-Ping Zeng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Adis, Springer Healthcare 2025-07-01
Series:Ophthalmology and Therapy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-025-01193-0
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849766391191699456
author Xin Liu
Meng-Meng Ji
Ling Jin
Ai-Ping Zeng
author_facet Xin Liu
Meng-Meng Ji
Ling Jin
Ai-Ping Zeng
author_sort Xin Liu
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Introduction To evaluate whether the air−fluid (A−F) exchange procedure should be recommended for silicone oil (SO) removal surgery. Methods Consecutive patients that underwent SO removal with or without A−F exchange were requested to complete a questionnaire regarding the presence of floaters and SO residual scores. The medical records of the patients who completed the questionnaire were also reviewed retrospectively for clinical data including best corrected visual acuity, postoperative detachment rate, and intraocular pressure, etc. Results A total of 124 cases were included, 68 in the A−F (+) group and 56 in the A−F (−). Both groups were similar in demographic data such as age, sex distribution, axial length, and duration of SO tamponade (all P > 0.05). During the process of A−F exchange, a layer of oil film residue can be observed under the microscope, and A−F exchange can remove the residual SO. The ratio of with/without floating in the A−F (−) versus A−F (+) group was 48/8 versus 36/32 (P < 0.01). In addition, the questionnaire survey on the SO residual scores showed a more significant difference in the impact on postoperative visual quality between the two groups. Conclusions A−F exchange can effectively reduce residual SO and is recommended as a routine procedure for SO removal surgery.
format Article
id doaj-art-7ae2870a8ff04cc0bbbea6301328adda
institution DOAJ
issn 2193-8245
2193-6528
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher Adis, Springer Healthcare
record_format Article
series Ophthalmology and Therapy
spelling doaj-art-7ae2870a8ff04cc0bbbea6301328adda2025-08-20T03:04:35ZengAdis, Springer HealthcareOphthalmology and Therapy2193-82452193-65282025-07-011482021202910.1007/s40123-025-01193-0Silicone Oil Removal With or Without Air–Fluid Exchange: A Retrospective Comparative StudyXin Liu0Meng-Meng Ji1Ling Jin2Ai-Ping Zeng3Department of Ophthalmology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyAbstract Introduction To evaluate whether the air−fluid (A−F) exchange procedure should be recommended for silicone oil (SO) removal surgery. Methods Consecutive patients that underwent SO removal with or without A−F exchange were requested to complete a questionnaire regarding the presence of floaters and SO residual scores. The medical records of the patients who completed the questionnaire were also reviewed retrospectively for clinical data including best corrected visual acuity, postoperative detachment rate, and intraocular pressure, etc. Results A total of 124 cases were included, 68 in the A−F (+) group and 56 in the A−F (−). Both groups were similar in demographic data such as age, sex distribution, axial length, and duration of SO tamponade (all P > 0.05). During the process of A−F exchange, a layer of oil film residue can be observed under the microscope, and A−F exchange can remove the residual SO. The ratio of with/without floating in the A−F (−) versus A−F (+) group was 48/8 versus 36/32 (P < 0.01). In addition, the questionnaire survey on the SO residual scores showed a more significant difference in the impact on postoperative visual quality between the two groups. Conclusions A−F exchange can effectively reduce residual SO and is recommended as a routine procedure for SO removal surgery.https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-025-01193-0Silicone oil removalAir–fluid exchangeVitrectomySilicone oil residualFloater
spellingShingle Xin Liu
Meng-Meng Ji
Ling Jin
Ai-Ping Zeng
Silicone Oil Removal With or Without Air–Fluid Exchange: A Retrospective Comparative Study
Ophthalmology and Therapy
Silicone oil removal
Air–fluid exchange
Vitrectomy
Silicone oil residual
Floater
title Silicone Oil Removal With or Without Air–Fluid Exchange: A Retrospective Comparative Study
title_full Silicone Oil Removal With or Without Air–Fluid Exchange: A Retrospective Comparative Study
title_fullStr Silicone Oil Removal With or Without Air–Fluid Exchange: A Retrospective Comparative Study
title_full_unstemmed Silicone Oil Removal With or Without Air–Fluid Exchange: A Retrospective Comparative Study
title_short Silicone Oil Removal With or Without Air–Fluid Exchange: A Retrospective Comparative Study
title_sort silicone oil removal with or without air fluid exchange a retrospective comparative study
topic Silicone oil removal
Air–fluid exchange
Vitrectomy
Silicone oil residual
Floater
url https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-025-01193-0
work_keys_str_mv AT xinliu siliconeoilremovalwithorwithoutairfluidexchangearetrospectivecomparativestudy
AT mengmengji siliconeoilremovalwithorwithoutairfluidexchangearetrospectivecomparativestudy
AT lingjin siliconeoilremovalwithorwithoutairfluidexchangearetrospectivecomparativestudy
AT aipingzeng siliconeoilremovalwithorwithoutairfluidexchangearetrospectivecomparativestudy