A prospective analysis of ureteral stenting during radical cystectomy and ileal conduit urinary diversion: Paediatric feeding tubes versus single‐J stents
Abstract Objectives This study compares postoperative outcomes of radical cystectomy (RC) with ileal conduit urinary diversion (ICUD) using paediatric feeding tubes versus single‐J ureteral stents. Materials and Methods Patients underwent RC with ICUD for bladder cancer between 2011 and 2018. Prospe...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2025-05-01
|
| Series: | BJUI Compass |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/bco2.70032 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849762025348005888 |
|---|---|
| author | Jonathan T. Ryan Tarek Ajami Adam Williams Dinno Mendiola Bruno Nahar Sanoj Punnen Chad R. Ritch Dipen J. Parekh Mark L. Gonzalgo |
| author_facet | Jonathan T. Ryan Tarek Ajami Adam Williams Dinno Mendiola Bruno Nahar Sanoj Punnen Chad R. Ritch Dipen J. Parekh Mark L. Gonzalgo |
| author_sort | Jonathan T. Ryan |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Objectives This study compares postoperative outcomes of radical cystectomy (RC) with ileal conduit urinary diversion (ICUD) using paediatric feeding tubes versus single‐J ureteral stents. Materials and Methods Patients underwent RC with ICUD for bladder cancer between 2011 and 2018. Prospective preoperative clinical, operative and postoperative data were collected. Postoperative complications including stricture, urine leak, urinary tract infection (UTI) and ileus were compared between patients who received 5‐Fr paediatric feeding tubes or 7‐Fr single‐J ureteral stents during surgery. Results Two hundred thirty‐four patients underwent RC with ICUD including 26 with paediatric feeding tubes and 208 with single‐J ureteral stents; 41% had robotic cystectomy, with 36% of these undergoing intracorporeal ICUD. Both groups were comparable in age, gender, kidney function and comorbidities. No significant differences were observed between groups for rates of ileus (20% vs. 34%, p = 0.14), urine leak (4% vs. 10%, p = 0.3), uretero‐ileal stricture (16% vs. 18%, p = 0.7) or overall urinary complications (20% vs. 37%, p = 0.12), except for a lower UTI rate in the feeding tube group (4% vs. 23%, p = 0.02). Median hospital stay was shorter in the feeding tube group (6 vs. 8 days, p = 0.015) with similar readmission rates compared to the stent group (p = 0.96). Conclusions Using 5‐Fr feeding tubes for ureteral stenting during RC with ICUD is a safe alternative to 7‐Fr single‐J stents, especially for patients with small ureters or delicate anatomy. Stent type showed no significant impact on postoperative urinary complications except for a lower UTI rate with feeding tubes, suggesting comparable overall outcomes between the two stent types. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-7ad1a0ff5e6d45bdaf20dcdb18a2c2a2 |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 2688-4526 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-05-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BJUI Compass |
| spelling | doaj-art-7ad1a0ff5e6d45bdaf20dcdb18a2c2a22025-08-20T03:05:50ZengWileyBJUI Compass2688-45262025-05-0165n/an/a10.1002/bco2.70032A prospective analysis of ureteral stenting during radical cystectomy and ileal conduit urinary diversion: Paediatric feeding tubes versus single‐J stentsJonathan T. Ryan0Tarek Ajami1Adam Williams2Dinno Mendiola3Bruno Nahar4Sanoj Punnen5Chad R. Ritch6Dipen J. Parekh7Mark L. Gonzalgo8Desai Sethi Urology Institute University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center Miami Florida USADesai Sethi Urology Institute University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center Miami Florida USADesai Sethi Urology Institute University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center Miami Florida USADesai Sethi Urology Institute University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center Miami Florida USADesai Sethi Urology Institute University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center Miami Florida USADesai Sethi Urology Institute University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center Miami Florida USADesai Sethi Urology Institute University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center Miami Florida USADesai Sethi Urology Institute University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center Miami Florida USADesai Sethi Urology Institute University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center Miami Florida USAAbstract Objectives This study compares postoperative outcomes of radical cystectomy (RC) with ileal conduit urinary diversion (ICUD) using paediatric feeding tubes versus single‐J ureteral stents. Materials and Methods Patients underwent RC with ICUD for bladder cancer between 2011 and 2018. Prospective preoperative clinical, operative and postoperative data were collected. Postoperative complications including stricture, urine leak, urinary tract infection (UTI) and ileus were compared between patients who received 5‐Fr paediatric feeding tubes or 7‐Fr single‐J ureteral stents during surgery. Results Two hundred thirty‐four patients underwent RC with ICUD including 26 with paediatric feeding tubes and 208 with single‐J ureteral stents; 41% had robotic cystectomy, with 36% of these undergoing intracorporeal ICUD. Both groups were comparable in age, gender, kidney function and comorbidities. No significant differences were observed between groups for rates of ileus (20% vs. 34%, p = 0.14), urine leak (4% vs. 10%, p = 0.3), uretero‐ileal stricture (16% vs. 18%, p = 0.7) or overall urinary complications (20% vs. 37%, p = 0.12), except for a lower UTI rate in the feeding tube group (4% vs. 23%, p = 0.02). Median hospital stay was shorter in the feeding tube group (6 vs. 8 days, p = 0.015) with similar readmission rates compared to the stent group (p = 0.96). Conclusions Using 5‐Fr feeding tubes for ureteral stenting during RC with ICUD is a safe alternative to 7‐Fr single‐J stents, especially for patients with small ureters or delicate anatomy. Stent type showed no significant impact on postoperative urinary complications except for a lower UTI rate with feeding tubes, suggesting comparable overall outcomes between the two stent types.https://doi.org/10.1002/bco2.70032bladder cancerileal conduit diversionpaediatric feeding tubespostoperative complicationsradical cystectomysingle‐J stents |
| spellingShingle | Jonathan T. Ryan Tarek Ajami Adam Williams Dinno Mendiola Bruno Nahar Sanoj Punnen Chad R. Ritch Dipen J. Parekh Mark L. Gonzalgo A prospective analysis of ureteral stenting during radical cystectomy and ileal conduit urinary diversion: Paediatric feeding tubes versus single‐J stents BJUI Compass bladder cancer ileal conduit diversion paediatric feeding tubes postoperative complications radical cystectomy single‐J stents |
| title | A prospective analysis of ureteral stenting during radical cystectomy and ileal conduit urinary diversion: Paediatric feeding tubes versus single‐J stents |
| title_full | A prospective analysis of ureteral stenting during radical cystectomy and ileal conduit urinary diversion: Paediatric feeding tubes versus single‐J stents |
| title_fullStr | A prospective analysis of ureteral stenting during radical cystectomy and ileal conduit urinary diversion: Paediatric feeding tubes versus single‐J stents |
| title_full_unstemmed | A prospective analysis of ureteral stenting during radical cystectomy and ileal conduit urinary diversion: Paediatric feeding tubes versus single‐J stents |
| title_short | A prospective analysis of ureteral stenting during radical cystectomy and ileal conduit urinary diversion: Paediatric feeding tubes versus single‐J stents |
| title_sort | prospective analysis of ureteral stenting during radical cystectomy and ileal conduit urinary diversion paediatric feeding tubes versus single j stents |
| topic | bladder cancer ileal conduit diversion paediatric feeding tubes postoperative complications radical cystectomy single‐J stents |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1002/bco2.70032 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT jonathantryan aprospectiveanalysisofureteralstentingduringradicalcystectomyandilealconduiturinarydiversionpaediatricfeedingtubesversussinglejstents AT tarekajami aprospectiveanalysisofureteralstentingduringradicalcystectomyandilealconduiturinarydiversionpaediatricfeedingtubesversussinglejstents AT adamwilliams aprospectiveanalysisofureteralstentingduringradicalcystectomyandilealconduiturinarydiversionpaediatricfeedingtubesversussinglejstents AT dinnomendiola aprospectiveanalysisofureteralstentingduringradicalcystectomyandilealconduiturinarydiversionpaediatricfeedingtubesversussinglejstents AT brunonahar aprospectiveanalysisofureteralstentingduringradicalcystectomyandilealconduiturinarydiversionpaediatricfeedingtubesversussinglejstents AT sanojpunnen aprospectiveanalysisofureteralstentingduringradicalcystectomyandilealconduiturinarydiversionpaediatricfeedingtubesversussinglejstents AT chadrritch aprospectiveanalysisofureteralstentingduringradicalcystectomyandilealconduiturinarydiversionpaediatricfeedingtubesversussinglejstents AT dipenjparekh aprospectiveanalysisofureteralstentingduringradicalcystectomyandilealconduiturinarydiversionpaediatricfeedingtubesversussinglejstents AT marklgonzalgo aprospectiveanalysisofureteralstentingduringradicalcystectomyandilealconduiturinarydiversionpaediatricfeedingtubesversussinglejstents AT jonathantryan prospectiveanalysisofureteralstentingduringradicalcystectomyandilealconduiturinarydiversionpaediatricfeedingtubesversussinglejstents AT tarekajami prospectiveanalysisofureteralstentingduringradicalcystectomyandilealconduiturinarydiversionpaediatricfeedingtubesversussinglejstents AT adamwilliams prospectiveanalysisofureteralstentingduringradicalcystectomyandilealconduiturinarydiversionpaediatricfeedingtubesversussinglejstents AT dinnomendiola prospectiveanalysisofureteralstentingduringradicalcystectomyandilealconduiturinarydiversionpaediatricfeedingtubesversussinglejstents AT brunonahar prospectiveanalysisofureteralstentingduringradicalcystectomyandilealconduiturinarydiversionpaediatricfeedingtubesversussinglejstents AT sanojpunnen prospectiveanalysisofureteralstentingduringradicalcystectomyandilealconduiturinarydiversionpaediatricfeedingtubesversussinglejstents AT chadrritch prospectiveanalysisofureteralstentingduringradicalcystectomyandilealconduiturinarydiversionpaediatricfeedingtubesversussinglejstents AT dipenjparekh prospectiveanalysisofureteralstentingduringradicalcystectomyandilealconduiturinarydiversionpaediatricfeedingtubesversussinglejstents AT marklgonzalgo prospectiveanalysisofureteralstentingduringradicalcystectomyandilealconduiturinarydiversionpaediatricfeedingtubesversussinglejstents |