Decision making in graduate physics coursework: What is being assessed versus what is expected

There is currently little physics education literature examining thinking and learning in graduate education and even less literature characterizing problem solving among physics graduate students despite this being an essential professional skill for physicists. Given reports of discrepancies betwe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michael E. Robbins, Nathan D. Davis, Eric W. Burkholder
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Physical Society 2025-05-01
Series:Physical Review Physics Education Research
Online Access:http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.21.010148
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849324152462245888
author Michael E. Robbins
Nathan D. Davis
Eric W. Burkholder
author_facet Michael E. Robbins
Nathan D. Davis
Eric W. Burkholder
author_sort Michael E. Robbins
collection DOAJ
description There is currently little physics education literature examining thinking and learning in graduate education and even less literature characterizing problem solving among physics graduate students despite this being an essential professional skill for physicists. Given reports of discrepancies between physics problem solving in the undergraduate classroom and “real-world” problem solving, we sought to investigate whether this discrepancy exists at the graduate level. We first investigate the problem-solving skills present in first-year graduate physics assignments. A recent framework that characterizes problem solving as decisions-to-be-made was used. Assignments were taken from the four core courses of one academic year at one research-intensive university and coded by two researchers. We found that only 4 of the 29 decisions in the framework were present in most of the assignments. We then interviewed 11 instructors from 3 universities and asked which decisions they expected of first-year graduate students. Eleven decisions were expected by eight or more of the participants, but only four of these decisions were commonly practiced on assignments. Therefore, there seems to be a mismatch between instructor expectations and practice of problem solving on assignments. This suggests that graduate physics courses may not be aligned with the problem-solving skills that physics graduate students will need in their research or future careers.
format Article
id doaj-art-7abe82d980db4feabfac8fb24f739ee9
institution Kabale University
issn 2469-9896
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher American Physical Society
record_format Article
series Physical Review Physics Education Research
spelling doaj-art-7abe82d980db4feabfac8fb24f739ee92025-08-20T03:48:47ZengAmerican Physical SocietyPhysical Review Physics Education Research2469-98962025-05-0121101014810.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.21.010148Decision making in graduate physics coursework: What is being assessed versus what is expectedMichael E. RobbinsNathan D. DavisEric W. BurkholderThere is currently little physics education literature examining thinking and learning in graduate education and even less literature characterizing problem solving among physics graduate students despite this being an essential professional skill for physicists. Given reports of discrepancies between physics problem solving in the undergraduate classroom and “real-world” problem solving, we sought to investigate whether this discrepancy exists at the graduate level. We first investigate the problem-solving skills present in first-year graduate physics assignments. A recent framework that characterizes problem solving as decisions-to-be-made was used. Assignments were taken from the four core courses of one academic year at one research-intensive university and coded by two researchers. We found that only 4 of the 29 decisions in the framework were present in most of the assignments. We then interviewed 11 instructors from 3 universities and asked which decisions they expected of first-year graduate students. Eleven decisions were expected by eight or more of the participants, but only four of these decisions were commonly practiced on assignments. Therefore, there seems to be a mismatch between instructor expectations and practice of problem solving on assignments. This suggests that graduate physics courses may not be aligned with the problem-solving skills that physics graduate students will need in their research or future careers.http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.21.010148
spellingShingle Michael E. Robbins
Nathan D. Davis
Eric W. Burkholder
Decision making in graduate physics coursework: What is being assessed versus what is expected
Physical Review Physics Education Research
title Decision making in graduate physics coursework: What is being assessed versus what is expected
title_full Decision making in graduate physics coursework: What is being assessed versus what is expected
title_fullStr Decision making in graduate physics coursework: What is being assessed versus what is expected
title_full_unstemmed Decision making in graduate physics coursework: What is being assessed versus what is expected
title_short Decision making in graduate physics coursework: What is being assessed versus what is expected
title_sort decision making in graduate physics coursework what is being assessed versus what is expected
url http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.21.010148
work_keys_str_mv AT michaelerobbins decisionmakingingraduatephysicscourseworkwhatisbeingassessedversuswhatisexpected
AT nathanddavis decisionmakingingraduatephysicscourseworkwhatisbeingassessedversuswhatisexpected
AT ericwburkholder decisionmakingingraduatephysicscourseworkwhatisbeingassessedversuswhatisexpected