Subscapularis Tendon Repair Improves Functional Internal Rotation after Onlay Design Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty

Background: A major challenge of the reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is to restore postoperative range of motion, especially internal and external rotation. Attempting to address this issue, several modifications to the prosthesis design have been made. Purpose: This study aimed to compare fu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Felipe Lacerda, Alexandre Lädermann, Mahmoud Faisal Adam, Angélique Delarue, Céline Daniel, Philippe Collin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Hive - Musculoskeletal S.A. 2025-01-01
Series:The Hive
Subjects:
Online Access:https://thehive-musculoskeletal.com/articles/677bcce3c8b3e82d1e6714be/detail
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850043631764766720
author Felipe Lacerda
Alexandre Lädermann
Mahmoud Faisal Adam
Angélique Delarue
Céline Daniel
Philippe Collin
author_facet Felipe Lacerda
Alexandre Lädermann
Mahmoud Faisal Adam
Angélique Delarue
Céline Daniel
Philippe Collin
author_sort Felipe Lacerda
collection DOAJ
description Background: A major challenge of the reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is to restore postoperative range of motion, especially internal and external rotation. Attempting to address this issue, several modifications to the prosthesis design have been made. Purpose: This study aimed to compare functional internal rotation (fIR) outcomes following RSA with different humeral implant designs. Methods: We conducted a retrospective comparative analysis of data from 384 patients, each with a minimum of two years of follow-up, who underwent RSA with two distinct implant models: an inlay 155° neck-shaft angle and an onlay 145° neck-shaft angle. We assessed the postoperative progress of fIR based on type I IR (with the hand blocked against the buttock), type II IR (involving lumbar sliding), and type III IR (characterized by smooth motion). We categorized type I as non-fIR, while types II and III were considered as fIR. To analyze the influence of subscapularis repair on fRI, both groups were further categorized into two subgroups: those with repaired subscapularis (subgroup R) and those without repaired subscapularis (subgroup NR). Results: No statistically significant difference was observed when comparing postoperative fIR between the two groups. Within the entire cohort, patients in subgroup R exhibited superior fIR outcomes compared to subgroup NR (40% type III vs. 19% type III, respectively; p<0.0001). In the inlay group, no statistically significant difference in fIR was found among subgroups. Conversely, patients in the onlay subgroup R demonstrated better fIR than those in the group NR (42% type III vs. 17% type III, respectively; p<0.0001). Conclusion: There was no significant difference in fIR following RSA based on humeral design. However, in subgroup R, there was an improvement in fIR for group onlay, but no significant impact was observed in the inlay group. These results suggest that subscapularis repair should be attempted in lateralized designs whenever possible. Patients with higher preoperative IR were more likely to experience a decrease in IR after surgery.
format Article
id doaj-art-7aaa8fccb14b4d6f98937a6e603bb128
institution DOAJ
issn 3042-5727
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher The Hive - Musculoskeletal S.A.
record_format Article
series The Hive
spelling doaj-art-7aaa8fccb14b4d6f98937a6e603bb1282025-08-20T02:55:10ZengThe Hive - Musculoskeletal S.A.The Hive3042-57272025-01-0111https://doi.org/10.70885/hmsj.2025.01.002Subscapularis Tendon Repair Improves Functional Internal Rotation after Onlay Design Reverse Shoulder ArthroplastyFelipe LacerdaAlexandre LädermannMahmoud Faisal AdamAngélique DelarueCéline DanielPhilippe CollinBackground: A major challenge of the reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is to restore postoperative range of motion, especially internal and external rotation. Attempting to address this issue, several modifications to the prosthesis design have been made. Purpose: This study aimed to compare functional internal rotation (fIR) outcomes following RSA with different humeral implant designs. Methods: We conducted a retrospective comparative analysis of data from 384 patients, each with a minimum of two years of follow-up, who underwent RSA with two distinct implant models: an inlay 155° neck-shaft angle and an onlay 145° neck-shaft angle. We assessed the postoperative progress of fIR based on type I IR (with the hand blocked against the buttock), type II IR (involving lumbar sliding), and type III IR (characterized by smooth motion). We categorized type I as non-fIR, while types II and III were considered as fIR. To analyze the influence of subscapularis repair on fRI, both groups were further categorized into two subgroups: those with repaired subscapularis (subgroup R) and those without repaired subscapularis (subgroup NR). Results: No statistically significant difference was observed when comparing postoperative fIR between the two groups. Within the entire cohort, patients in subgroup R exhibited superior fIR outcomes compared to subgroup NR (40% type III vs. 19% type III, respectively; p<0.0001). In the inlay group, no statistically significant difference in fIR was found among subgroups. Conversely, patients in the onlay subgroup R demonstrated better fIR than those in the group NR (42% type III vs. 17% type III, respectively; p<0.0001). Conclusion: There was no significant difference in fIR following RSA based on humeral design. However, in subgroup R, there was an improvement in fIR for group onlay, but no significant impact was observed in the inlay group. These results suggest that subscapularis repair should be attempted in lateralized designs whenever possible. Patients with higher preoperative IR were more likely to experience a decrease in IR after surgery.https://thehive-musculoskeletal.com/articles/677bcce3c8b3e82d1e6714be/detailprosthesisonlayinlayprosthetic designrange of motioncomplicationsproms
spellingShingle Felipe Lacerda
Alexandre Lädermann
Mahmoud Faisal Adam
Angélique Delarue
Céline Daniel
Philippe Collin
Subscapularis Tendon Repair Improves Functional Internal Rotation after Onlay Design Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty
The Hive
prosthesis
onlay
inlay
prosthetic design
range of motion
complications
proms
title Subscapularis Tendon Repair Improves Functional Internal Rotation after Onlay Design Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty
title_full Subscapularis Tendon Repair Improves Functional Internal Rotation after Onlay Design Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty
title_fullStr Subscapularis Tendon Repair Improves Functional Internal Rotation after Onlay Design Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed Subscapularis Tendon Repair Improves Functional Internal Rotation after Onlay Design Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty
title_short Subscapularis Tendon Repair Improves Functional Internal Rotation after Onlay Design Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty
title_sort subscapularis tendon repair improves functional internal rotation after onlay design reverse shoulder arthroplasty
topic prosthesis
onlay
inlay
prosthetic design
range of motion
complications
proms
url https://thehive-musculoskeletal.com/articles/677bcce3c8b3e82d1e6714be/detail
work_keys_str_mv AT felipelacerda subscapularistendonrepairimprovesfunctionalinternalrotationafteronlaydesignreverseshoulderarthroplasty
AT alexandreladermann subscapularistendonrepairimprovesfunctionalinternalrotationafteronlaydesignreverseshoulderarthroplasty
AT mahmoudfaisaladam subscapularistendonrepairimprovesfunctionalinternalrotationafteronlaydesignreverseshoulderarthroplasty
AT angeliquedelarue subscapularistendonrepairimprovesfunctionalinternalrotationafteronlaydesignreverseshoulderarthroplasty
AT celinedaniel subscapularistendonrepairimprovesfunctionalinternalrotationafteronlaydesignreverseshoulderarthroplasty
AT philippecollin subscapularistendonrepairimprovesfunctionalinternalrotationafteronlaydesignreverseshoulderarthroplasty