Association between the difference in estimated GFR based on cystatin C versus creatinine in coronary artery diseases

Background The difference in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) derived from creatinine and cystatin C (eGFRdiff) has been noticed recently and the relationship with poor cardiovascular prognosis has been proven. However, primary prevention of the risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) is eq...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zechen Liu, Wangying Jiang, Yanjun Song, Kefei Dou, Weihua Song
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2025-12-01
Series:Renal Failure
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/0886022X.2025.2482127
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849697643186356224
author Zechen Liu
Wangying Jiang
Yanjun Song
Kefei Dou
Weihua Song
author_facet Zechen Liu
Wangying Jiang
Yanjun Song
Kefei Dou
Weihua Song
author_sort Zechen Liu
collection DOAJ
description Background The difference in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) derived from creatinine and cystatin C (eGFRdiff) has been noticed recently and the relationship with poor cardiovascular prognosis has been proven. However, primary prevention of the risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) is equally important but there is a lack of studies specifically investigating this implication.Methods This prospective cohort study utilized data from the UK Biobank, including 437,536 participants without CAD at baseline. The primary outcome was defined as CAD. The eGFRdiff was calculated by subtracting creatinine-based eGFR from cystatin C-based eGFR. Participants were then categorized into a negative, intermediate range, and positive group based on thresholds of −15 mL/min/1.73 m2 and 15 mL/min/1.73 m2. Cox proportional risk models were used to evaluate the associations of eGFRdiff with CAD and the relationship among different genetic risks of CAD.Results During a median follow-up of 13.8 years, CAD occurred in 36,797 participants. In the fully adjusted model, compared to midrange eGFRdiff, participants with a positive eGFRdiff had a lower risk of CAD (HR 0.717, 95%CI 0.675-0.762), while with a negative eGFRdiff had a higher risk (HR 1.433, 95%CI 1.399-1.468). When eGFRdiff was treated as a continuous variable, a statistically significant trend toward a lower risk of CAD as eGFRdiff increased (HR 0.982, 95% CI 0.981-0.982). Moreover, this relationship is independent of genetic susceptibility.Conclusions eGFRdiff was associated with CAD risk, where a high eGFRdiff corresponded to a decreased likelihood of CAD onset no matter genetic susceptibility.
format Article
id doaj-art-7aa1759bf99c4d419f565f669f8eda7a
institution DOAJ
issn 0886-022X
1525-6049
language English
publishDate 2025-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Renal Failure
spelling doaj-art-7aa1759bf99c4d419f565f669f8eda7a2025-08-20T03:19:08ZengTaylor & Francis GroupRenal Failure0886-022X1525-60492025-12-0147110.1080/0886022X.2025.2482127Association between the difference in estimated GFR based on cystatin C versus creatinine in coronary artery diseasesZechen Liu0Wangying Jiang1Yanjun Song2Kefei Dou3Weihua Song4Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College/National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Beijing, ChinaFuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College/National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Beijing, ChinaFuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College/National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Beijing, ChinaFuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College/National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Beijing, ChinaFuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College/National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Beijing, ChinaBackground The difference in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) derived from creatinine and cystatin C (eGFRdiff) has been noticed recently and the relationship with poor cardiovascular prognosis has been proven. However, primary prevention of the risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) is equally important but there is a lack of studies specifically investigating this implication.Methods This prospective cohort study utilized data from the UK Biobank, including 437,536 participants without CAD at baseline. The primary outcome was defined as CAD. The eGFRdiff was calculated by subtracting creatinine-based eGFR from cystatin C-based eGFR. Participants were then categorized into a negative, intermediate range, and positive group based on thresholds of −15 mL/min/1.73 m2 and 15 mL/min/1.73 m2. Cox proportional risk models were used to evaluate the associations of eGFRdiff with CAD and the relationship among different genetic risks of CAD.Results During a median follow-up of 13.8 years, CAD occurred in 36,797 participants. In the fully adjusted model, compared to midrange eGFRdiff, participants with a positive eGFRdiff had a lower risk of CAD (HR 0.717, 95%CI 0.675-0.762), while with a negative eGFRdiff had a higher risk (HR 1.433, 95%CI 1.399-1.468). When eGFRdiff was treated as a continuous variable, a statistically significant trend toward a lower risk of CAD as eGFRdiff increased (HR 0.982, 95% CI 0.981-0.982). Moreover, this relationship is independent of genetic susceptibility.Conclusions eGFRdiff was associated with CAD risk, where a high eGFRdiff corresponded to a decreased likelihood of CAD onset no matter genetic susceptibility.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/0886022X.2025.2482127coronary artery diseaseestimated glomerular filtration ratecreatininecystatin CUK biobank
spellingShingle Zechen Liu
Wangying Jiang
Yanjun Song
Kefei Dou
Weihua Song
Association between the difference in estimated GFR based on cystatin C versus creatinine in coronary artery diseases
Renal Failure
coronary artery disease
estimated glomerular filtration rate
creatinine
cystatin C
UK biobank
title Association between the difference in estimated GFR based on cystatin C versus creatinine in coronary artery diseases
title_full Association between the difference in estimated GFR based on cystatin C versus creatinine in coronary artery diseases
title_fullStr Association between the difference in estimated GFR based on cystatin C versus creatinine in coronary artery diseases
title_full_unstemmed Association between the difference in estimated GFR based on cystatin C versus creatinine in coronary artery diseases
title_short Association between the difference in estimated GFR based on cystatin C versus creatinine in coronary artery diseases
title_sort association between the difference in estimated gfr based on cystatin c versus creatinine in coronary artery diseases
topic coronary artery disease
estimated glomerular filtration rate
creatinine
cystatin C
UK biobank
url https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/0886022X.2025.2482127
work_keys_str_mv AT zechenliu associationbetweenthedifferenceinestimatedgfrbasedoncystatincversuscreatinineincoronaryarterydiseases
AT wangyingjiang associationbetweenthedifferenceinestimatedgfrbasedoncystatincversuscreatinineincoronaryarterydiseases
AT yanjunsong associationbetweenthedifferenceinestimatedgfrbasedoncystatincversuscreatinineincoronaryarterydiseases
AT kefeidou associationbetweenthedifferenceinestimatedgfrbasedoncystatincversuscreatinineincoronaryarterydiseases
AT weihuasong associationbetweenthedifferenceinestimatedgfrbasedoncystatincversuscreatinineincoronaryarterydiseases