Comparison of the clinical parameters of restorations performed with total-etch and self-etch adhesive techniques
AIM. To conduct a systematic review to evaluate the differences between the clinical performance of restorations made with total-etch and self-etch techniques.MATERIALS AND METHODS. A literature search was conducted in the Pubmed, Google Scholar and Cyberleninka databases. The research was done acco...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Russian |
| Published: |
LLC "Endo Press"
2024-04-01
|
| Series: | Эндодонтия Today |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.endodont.ru/jour/article/view/1294 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849695612358885376 |
|---|---|
| author | Z. S. Khabadze M. Yu. Dashtieva M. M. Borlakova A. K. Urazgulov D. P. Smirnov Z. V. Kozlova T. A. Eliseeva M. V. Kostinskaya A. V. Shegai |
| author_facet | Z. S. Khabadze M. Yu. Dashtieva M. M. Borlakova A. K. Urazgulov D. P. Smirnov Z. V. Kozlova T. A. Eliseeva M. V. Kostinskaya A. V. Shegai |
| author_sort | Z. S. Khabadze |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | AIM. To conduct a systematic review to evaluate the differences between the clinical performance of restorations made with total-etch and self-etch techniques.MATERIALS AND METHODS. A literature search was conducted in the Pubmed, Google Scholar and Cyberleninka databases. The research was done according to the PICO strategy. Articles from the last 10 years (2013–2023) were included in the review.RESULTS. After screening 1005 articles, 52 studies were subjected to data extraction. There were no statistically significant differences in any study regarding recurrence of caries. In 9 of 14 articles, retention was higher with the total-etch technique. Total-etch groups showed better marginal adaptation in 11 of 19 studies. 11 of 17 studies recorded the least marginal staining using the total-etch technique. None of the studies found statistically significant results for the presence of post-operative sensitivity at the end of the follow-up period. However, three studies reported statistically significant evidence of post-operative sensitivity at baseline, and after 12 months (1/2 follow-up) in the total-etch groups only.CONCLUSIONS. Both methods show effective and clinically acceptable restoration performance. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-7a868eca46ec450281607a45a2bfd5f9 |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 1683-2981 1726-7242 |
| language | Russian |
| publishDate | 2024-04-01 |
| publisher | LLC "Endo Press" |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Эндодонтия Today |
| spelling | doaj-art-7a868eca46ec450281607a45a2bfd5f92025-08-20T03:19:43ZrusLLC "Endo Press"Эндодонтия Today1683-29811726-72422024-04-01221395010.36377/ET-00091073Comparison of the clinical parameters of restorations performed with total-etch and self-etch adhesive techniquesZ. S. Khabadze0M. Yu. Dashtieva1M. M. Borlakova2A. K. Urazgulov3D. P. Smirnov4Z. V. Kozlova5T. A. Eliseeva6M. V. Kostinskaya7A. V. Shegai8Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University)Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University), Medical InstitutePeoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University), Medical InstitutePeoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University), Medical InstitutePeoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University), Medical InstitutePeoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University), Medical InstitutePeoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University), Medical InstitutePeoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University), Medical InstitutePeoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba (RUDN University), Medical InstituteAIM. To conduct a systematic review to evaluate the differences between the clinical performance of restorations made with total-etch and self-etch techniques.MATERIALS AND METHODS. A literature search was conducted in the Pubmed, Google Scholar and Cyberleninka databases. The research was done according to the PICO strategy. Articles from the last 10 years (2013–2023) were included in the review.RESULTS. After screening 1005 articles, 52 studies were subjected to data extraction. There were no statistically significant differences in any study regarding recurrence of caries. In 9 of 14 articles, retention was higher with the total-etch technique. Total-etch groups showed better marginal adaptation in 11 of 19 studies. 11 of 17 studies recorded the least marginal staining using the total-etch technique. None of the studies found statistically significant results for the presence of post-operative sensitivity at the end of the follow-up period. However, three studies reported statistically significant evidence of post-operative sensitivity at baseline, and after 12 months (1/2 follow-up) in the total-etch groups only.CONCLUSIONS. Both methods show effective and clinically acceptable restoration performance.https://www.endodont.ru/jour/article/view/1294adhesive strategiesrestorative dentistryself-etchetch-and-rinsetotal-etch |
| spellingShingle | Z. S. Khabadze M. Yu. Dashtieva M. M. Borlakova A. K. Urazgulov D. P. Smirnov Z. V. Kozlova T. A. Eliseeva M. V. Kostinskaya A. V. Shegai Comparison of the clinical parameters of restorations performed with total-etch and self-etch adhesive techniques Эндодонтия Today adhesive strategies restorative dentistry self-etch etch-and-rinse total-etch |
| title | Comparison of the clinical parameters of restorations performed with total-etch and self-etch adhesive techniques |
| title_full | Comparison of the clinical parameters of restorations performed with total-etch and self-etch adhesive techniques |
| title_fullStr | Comparison of the clinical parameters of restorations performed with total-etch and self-etch adhesive techniques |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the clinical parameters of restorations performed with total-etch and self-etch adhesive techniques |
| title_short | Comparison of the clinical parameters of restorations performed with total-etch and self-etch adhesive techniques |
| title_sort | comparison of the clinical parameters of restorations performed with total etch and self etch adhesive techniques |
| topic | adhesive strategies restorative dentistry self-etch etch-and-rinse total-etch |
| url | https://www.endodont.ru/jour/article/view/1294 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT zskhabadze comparisonoftheclinicalparametersofrestorationsperformedwithtotaletchandselfetchadhesivetechniques AT myudashtieva comparisonoftheclinicalparametersofrestorationsperformedwithtotaletchandselfetchadhesivetechniques AT mmborlakova comparisonoftheclinicalparametersofrestorationsperformedwithtotaletchandselfetchadhesivetechniques AT akurazgulov comparisonoftheclinicalparametersofrestorationsperformedwithtotaletchandselfetchadhesivetechniques AT dpsmirnov comparisonoftheclinicalparametersofrestorationsperformedwithtotaletchandselfetchadhesivetechniques AT zvkozlova comparisonoftheclinicalparametersofrestorationsperformedwithtotaletchandselfetchadhesivetechniques AT taeliseeva comparisonoftheclinicalparametersofrestorationsperformedwithtotaletchandselfetchadhesivetechniques AT mvkostinskaya comparisonoftheclinicalparametersofrestorationsperformedwithtotaletchandselfetchadhesivetechniques AT avshegai comparisonoftheclinicalparametersofrestorationsperformedwithtotaletchandselfetchadhesivetechniques |