Medial gastrocnemius flap: infection control in megaprostheses

Introduction: Medial gastrocnemius flaps are commonly employed in conjunction with endoprosthesis implantations for the management of malignant tumors affecting the proximal segment of the tibia. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the routine transfer of the muscle on the incidence of infec...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rana Kapukaya, Gazi Kutalmış Yaprak, Asena Ayça Özdemir, Ahmet Kapukaya
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Medical Journals Sweden 2025-05-01
Series:Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://medicaljournalssweden.se/JPHS/article/view/43537
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849224374198992896
author Rana Kapukaya
Gazi Kutalmış Yaprak
Asena Ayça Özdemir
Ahmet Kapukaya
author_facet Rana Kapukaya
Gazi Kutalmış Yaprak
Asena Ayça Özdemir
Ahmet Kapukaya
author_sort Rana Kapukaya
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Medial gastrocnemius flaps are commonly employed in conjunction with endoprosthesis implantations for the management of malignant tumors affecting the proximal segment of the tibia. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the routine transfer of the muscle on the incidence of infections within the surgical field. Methods: Forty-three patients presenting with a suspected malignant tumor in the proximal segment of the cruris underwent evaluation at our hospital. The enrolled patients were stratified into two cohorts. Patients in Group 1 (n = 16) underwent a combined procedure involving a medial gastrocnemius flap and a megaprosthesis, whereas patients in Group 2 (n = 17) did not undergo flap surgery. Results: In Group 1, osteosarcoma (OS) was diagnosed in seven patients (43%). Subsequently, oncologic resection with a wide margin was performed on the affected bone region, resulting in an average defect length of mean 12.81 ± 5.05 cm. The patients in this group were followed-up for an average duration of 34.06 ± 13.21 months. Similarly, in Group 2, OS was present in seven patients (41.17%), and they underwent identical oncologic resection procedures. The mean defect length in Group 2 was measured at mean 14.12 ± 4.54 cm. The average follow-up period for patients in Group 2 was 30.41 ± 12.06 months. Conclusion: Within Group 1, four patients (25%) experienced infections within the surgical site, while within Group 2, five patients (29.4%) exhibited such infections (p > 0.05). The utilization of megaprostheses in osseous defect repair, either alone or in combination with gastrocnemius flaps, did not yield statistically significant differences in infection rates.
format Article
id doaj-art-7a5911a896cc4eb3a2d0d325d430d495
institution Kabale University
issn 2000-6764
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher Medical Journals Sweden
record_format Article
series Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery
spelling doaj-art-7a5911a896cc4eb3a2d0d325d430d4952025-08-25T11:15:58ZengMedical Journals SwedenJournal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery2000-67642025-05-0160110.2340/jphs.v60.43537Medial gastrocnemius flap: infection control in megaprosthesesRana Kapukaya0Gazi Kutalmış Yaprak1Asena Ayça Özdemir2Ahmet Kapukaya3Department of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Adana City Hospital, Adana, TurkeyPlastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Çukurova University, Medical Faculty Hospital, Adana, TürkiyeDepartment of Medical Education, Mersin University, Mersin, TürkiyeDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Adana City Hospital, Adana, Türkiye Introduction: Medial gastrocnemius flaps are commonly employed in conjunction with endoprosthesis implantations for the management of malignant tumors affecting the proximal segment of the tibia. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the routine transfer of the muscle on the incidence of infections within the surgical field. Methods: Forty-three patients presenting with a suspected malignant tumor in the proximal segment of the cruris underwent evaluation at our hospital. The enrolled patients were stratified into two cohorts. Patients in Group 1 (n = 16) underwent a combined procedure involving a medial gastrocnemius flap and a megaprosthesis, whereas patients in Group 2 (n = 17) did not undergo flap surgery. Results: In Group 1, osteosarcoma (OS) was diagnosed in seven patients (43%). Subsequently, oncologic resection with a wide margin was performed on the affected bone region, resulting in an average defect length of mean 12.81 ± 5.05 cm. The patients in this group were followed-up for an average duration of 34.06 ± 13.21 months. Similarly, in Group 2, OS was present in seven patients (41.17%), and they underwent identical oncologic resection procedures. The mean defect length in Group 2 was measured at mean 14.12 ± 4.54 cm. The average follow-up period for patients in Group 2 was 30.41 ± 12.06 months. Conclusion: Within Group 1, four patients (25%) experienced infections within the surgical site, while within Group 2, five patients (29.4%) exhibited such infections (p > 0.05). The utilization of megaprostheses in osseous defect repair, either alone or in combination with gastrocnemius flaps, did not yield statistically significant differences in infection rates. https://medicaljournalssweden.se/JPHS/article/view/43537Gastrocnemius flapmegaprosthesisinfectionproksimal tibia
spellingShingle Rana Kapukaya
Gazi Kutalmış Yaprak
Asena Ayça Özdemir
Ahmet Kapukaya
Medial gastrocnemius flap: infection control in megaprostheses
Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery
Gastrocnemius flap
megaprosthesis
infection
proksimal tibia
title Medial gastrocnemius flap: infection control in megaprostheses
title_full Medial gastrocnemius flap: infection control in megaprostheses
title_fullStr Medial gastrocnemius flap: infection control in megaprostheses
title_full_unstemmed Medial gastrocnemius flap: infection control in megaprostheses
title_short Medial gastrocnemius flap: infection control in megaprostheses
title_sort medial gastrocnemius flap infection control in megaprostheses
topic Gastrocnemius flap
megaprosthesis
infection
proksimal tibia
url https://medicaljournalssweden.se/JPHS/article/view/43537
work_keys_str_mv AT ranakapukaya medialgastrocnemiusflapinfectioncontrolinmegaprostheses
AT gazikutalmısyaprak medialgastrocnemiusflapinfectioncontrolinmegaprostheses
AT asenaaycaozdemir medialgastrocnemiusflapinfectioncontrolinmegaprostheses
AT ahmetkapukaya medialgastrocnemiusflapinfectioncontrolinmegaprostheses