Doing (Prison) Research Differently: Reflections on Autoethnography and ‘Emotional Recall’

This paper offers a reflection on both the family of methods called autoethnography and on the experience of doing autoethnography in practice as a follow-up to a prison ethnography. By engaging with the literature on autoethnography, it provides an overview of the methodology and focuses on one pa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Luigi Gariglio
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Oñati International Institute for the Sociology of Law 2017-07-01
Series:Oñati Socio-Legal Series
Subjects:
Online Access:https://opo.iisj.net/index.php/osls/article/view/893
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850268520546304000
author Luigi Gariglio
author_facet Luigi Gariglio
author_sort Luigi Gariglio
collection DOAJ
description This paper offers a reflection on both the family of methods called autoethnography and on the experience of doing autoethnography in practice as a follow-up to a prison ethnography. By engaging with the literature on autoethnography, it provides an overview of the methodology and focuses on one particular experience of doing (prison) research differently by adopting the notion of emotional recall as a heuristic tool. More specifically, this paper shows how emotional recall was vital to yielding a substantive research finding through autoethnographic re-engagement with data collected during an ethnography of prison officers’ threat of the use of force in an Italian prison. Through autoethnography, prison officers’ favouritism towards Mafioso was found to be a key aspect of officers’ use of discretion in the prison setting. Este artículo ofrece una reflexión en torno a la familia de métodos llamada autoetnografía, así como a la experiencia de practicar la autoetnografía como continuación de una etnografía carcelaria. A través de una inmersión en la literatura sobre autoetnografía, proporciona un repaso de dicha metodología y se centra en una experiencia particular de hacer investigación (penitenciaria) de una forma diferente, a través del recuerdo emocional como instrumento heurístico. De forma más específica, el artículo muestra cómo el recuerdo emocional fue clave para un hallazgo investigativo sustancial mediante un nuevo análisis autoetnográfico de datos obtenidos durante una etnografía de la amenaza del uso de la fuerza por parte de los funcionarios en una prisión italiana. Mediante la autoetnografía, se descubrió que el favoritismo de los funcionarios hacia los mafiosos era un aspecto clave en el uso de la discreción por parte de los funcionarios. Available from: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-0932
format Article
id doaj-art-7a43870c7d34429fa31c9b6081ee02ee
institution OA Journals
issn 2079-5971
language English
publishDate 2017-07-01
publisher Oñati International Institute for the Sociology of Law
record_format Article
series Oñati Socio-Legal Series
spelling doaj-art-7a43870c7d34429fa31c9b6081ee02ee2025-08-20T01:53:26ZengOñati International Institute for the Sociology of LawOñati Socio-Legal Series2079-59712017-07-0182748Doing (Prison) Research Differently: Reflections on Autoethnography and ‘Emotional Recall’Luigi Gariglio0University of Turin This paper offers a reflection on both the family of methods called autoethnography and on the experience of doing autoethnography in practice as a follow-up to a prison ethnography. By engaging with the literature on autoethnography, it provides an overview of the methodology and focuses on one particular experience of doing (prison) research differently by adopting the notion of emotional recall as a heuristic tool. More specifically, this paper shows how emotional recall was vital to yielding a substantive research finding through autoethnographic re-engagement with data collected during an ethnography of prison officers’ threat of the use of force in an Italian prison. Through autoethnography, prison officers’ favouritism towards Mafioso was found to be a key aspect of officers’ use of discretion in the prison setting. Este artículo ofrece una reflexión en torno a la familia de métodos llamada autoetnografía, así como a la experiencia de practicar la autoetnografía como continuación de una etnografía carcelaria. A través de una inmersión en la literatura sobre autoetnografía, proporciona un repaso de dicha metodología y se centra en una experiencia particular de hacer investigación (penitenciaria) de una forma diferente, a través del recuerdo emocional como instrumento heurístico. De forma más específica, el artículo muestra cómo el recuerdo emocional fue clave para un hallazgo investigativo sustancial mediante un nuevo análisis autoetnográfico de datos obtenidos durante una etnografía de la amenaza del uso de la fuerza por parte de los funcionarios en una prisión italiana. Mediante la autoetnografía, se descubrió que el favoritismo de los funcionarios hacia los mafiosos era un aspecto clave en el uso de la discreción por parte de los funcionarios. Available from: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-0932 https://opo.iisj.net/index.php/osls/article/view/893Qualitative methodologyemotional recalldiscretionprison officersMafiosoautoethnography
spellingShingle Luigi Gariglio
Doing (Prison) Research Differently: Reflections on Autoethnography and ‘Emotional Recall’
Oñati Socio-Legal Series
Qualitative methodology
emotional recall
discretion
prison officers
Mafioso
autoethnography
title Doing (Prison) Research Differently: Reflections on Autoethnography and ‘Emotional Recall’
title_full Doing (Prison) Research Differently: Reflections on Autoethnography and ‘Emotional Recall’
title_fullStr Doing (Prison) Research Differently: Reflections on Autoethnography and ‘Emotional Recall’
title_full_unstemmed Doing (Prison) Research Differently: Reflections on Autoethnography and ‘Emotional Recall’
title_short Doing (Prison) Research Differently: Reflections on Autoethnography and ‘Emotional Recall’
title_sort doing prison research differently reflections on autoethnography and emotional recall
topic Qualitative methodology
emotional recall
discretion
prison officers
Mafioso
autoethnography
url https://opo.iisj.net/index.php/osls/article/view/893
work_keys_str_mv AT luigigariglio doingprisonresearchdifferentlyreflectionsonautoethnographyandemotionalrecall