Nanotopographic substrates of poly (methyl methacrylate) do not strongly influence the osteogenic phenotype of mesenchymal stem cells in vitro.

The chemical, mechanical, and topographical features of the extracellular matrix (ECM) have all been documented to influence cell adhesion, gene expression, migration, proliferation, and differentiation. Topography plays a key role in the architecture and functionality of various tissues in vivo, th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Isaac A Janson, Yen P Kong, Andrew J Putnam
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0090719&type=printable
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849720270619672576
author Isaac A Janson
Yen P Kong
Andrew J Putnam
author_facet Isaac A Janson
Yen P Kong
Andrew J Putnam
author_sort Isaac A Janson
collection DOAJ
description The chemical, mechanical, and topographical features of the extracellular matrix (ECM) have all been documented to influence cell adhesion, gene expression, migration, proliferation, and differentiation. Topography plays a key role in the architecture and functionality of various tissues in vivo, thus raising the possibility that topographic cues can be instructive when incorporated into biomaterials for regenerative applications. In the literature, there are discrepancies regarding the potential roles of nanotopography to enhance the osteogenic phenotype of mesenchymal stem cells (MSC). In this study, we used thin film substrates of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) with nanoscale gratings to investigate the influence of nanotopography on the osteogenic phenotype of MSCs, focusing in particular on their ability to produce mineral similar to native bone. Topography influenced focal adhesion size and MSC alignment, and enhanced MSC proliferation after 14 days of culture. However, the osteogenic phenotype was minimally influenced by surface topography. Specifically, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) expression was not increased on nanotopographic films, nor was calcium deposition improved after 21 days in culture. Ca: P ratios were similar to native mouse bone on films with gratings of 415 nm width and 200 nm depth (G415) and 303 nm width and 190 nm depth (G303). Notably, all surfaces had Ca∶P ratios significantly lower than G415 films. Collectively, these data suggest that, PMMA films with nanogratings are poor drivers of an osteogenic phenotype.
format Article
id doaj-art-7a2ee86adb914bb78d3275cc496024ba
institution DOAJ
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-7a2ee86adb914bb78d3275cc496024ba2025-08-20T03:11:58ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0193e9071910.1371/journal.pone.0090719Nanotopographic substrates of poly (methyl methacrylate) do not strongly influence the osteogenic phenotype of mesenchymal stem cells in vitro.Isaac A JansonYen P KongAndrew J PutnamThe chemical, mechanical, and topographical features of the extracellular matrix (ECM) have all been documented to influence cell adhesion, gene expression, migration, proliferation, and differentiation. Topography plays a key role in the architecture and functionality of various tissues in vivo, thus raising the possibility that topographic cues can be instructive when incorporated into biomaterials for regenerative applications. In the literature, there are discrepancies regarding the potential roles of nanotopography to enhance the osteogenic phenotype of mesenchymal stem cells (MSC). In this study, we used thin film substrates of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) with nanoscale gratings to investigate the influence of nanotopography on the osteogenic phenotype of MSCs, focusing in particular on their ability to produce mineral similar to native bone. Topography influenced focal adhesion size and MSC alignment, and enhanced MSC proliferation after 14 days of culture. However, the osteogenic phenotype was minimally influenced by surface topography. Specifically, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) expression was not increased on nanotopographic films, nor was calcium deposition improved after 21 days in culture. Ca: P ratios were similar to native mouse bone on films with gratings of 415 nm width and 200 nm depth (G415) and 303 nm width and 190 nm depth (G303). Notably, all surfaces had Ca∶P ratios significantly lower than G415 films. Collectively, these data suggest that, PMMA films with nanogratings are poor drivers of an osteogenic phenotype.https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0090719&type=printable
spellingShingle Isaac A Janson
Yen P Kong
Andrew J Putnam
Nanotopographic substrates of poly (methyl methacrylate) do not strongly influence the osteogenic phenotype of mesenchymal stem cells in vitro.
PLoS ONE
title Nanotopographic substrates of poly (methyl methacrylate) do not strongly influence the osteogenic phenotype of mesenchymal stem cells in vitro.
title_full Nanotopographic substrates of poly (methyl methacrylate) do not strongly influence the osteogenic phenotype of mesenchymal stem cells in vitro.
title_fullStr Nanotopographic substrates of poly (methyl methacrylate) do not strongly influence the osteogenic phenotype of mesenchymal stem cells in vitro.
title_full_unstemmed Nanotopographic substrates of poly (methyl methacrylate) do not strongly influence the osteogenic phenotype of mesenchymal stem cells in vitro.
title_short Nanotopographic substrates of poly (methyl methacrylate) do not strongly influence the osteogenic phenotype of mesenchymal stem cells in vitro.
title_sort nanotopographic substrates of poly methyl methacrylate do not strongly influence the osteogenic phenotype of mesenchymal stem cells in vitro
url https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0090719&type=printable
work_keys_str_mv AT isaacajanson nanotopographicsubstratesofpolymethylmethacrylatedonotstronglyinfluencetheosteogenicphenotypeofmesenchymalstemcellsinvitro
AT yenpkong nanotopographicsubstratesofpolymethylmethacrylatedonotstronglyinfluencetheosteogenicphenotypeofmesenchymalstemcellsinvitro
AT andrewjputnam nanotopographicsubstratesofpolymethylmethacrylatedonotstronglyinfluencetheosteogenicphenotypeofmesenchymalstemcellsinvitro