Chemotaxis: a feedback-based computational model robustly predicts multiple aspects of real cell behaviour.

The mechanism of eukaryotic chemotaxis remains unclear despite intensive study. The most frequently described mechanism acts through attractants causing actin polymerization, in turn leading to pseudopod formation and cell movement. We recently proposed an alternative mechanism, supported by several...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Matthew P Neilson, Douwe M Veltman, Peter J M van Haastert, Steven D Webb, John A Mackenzie, Robert H Insall
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2011-05-01
Series:PLoS Biology
Online Access:https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1000618&type=printable
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849726609080188928
author Matthew P Neilson
Douwe M Veltman
Peter J M van Haastert
Steven D Webb
John A Mackenzie
Robert H Insall
author_facet Matthew P Neilson
Douwe M Veltman
Peter J M van Haastert
Steven D Webb
John A Mackenzie
Robert H Insall
author_sort Matthew P Neilson
collection DOAJ
description The mechanism of eukaryotic chemotaxis remains unclear despite intensive study. The most frequently described mechanism acts through attractants causing actin polymerization, in turn leading to pseudopod formation and cell movement. We recently proposed an alternative mechanism, supported by several lines of data, in which pseudopods are made by a self-generated cycle. If chemoattractants are present, they modulate the cycle rather than directly causing actin polymerization. The aim of this work is to test the explanatory and predictive powers of such pseudopod-based models to predict the complex behaviour of cells in chemotaxis. We have now tested the effectiveness of this mechanism using a computational model of cell movement and chemotaxis based on pseudopod autocatalysis. The model reproduces a surprisingly wide range of existing data about cell movement and chemotaxis. It simulates cell polarization and persistence without stimuli and selection of accurate pseudopods when chemoattractant gradients are present. It predicts both bias of pseudopod position in low chemoattractant gradients and--unexpectedly--lateral pseudopod initiation in high gradients. To test the predictive ability of the model, we looked for untested and novel predictions. One prediction from the model is that the angle between successive pseudopods at the front of the cell will increase in proportion to the difference between the cell's direction and the direction of the gradient. We measured the angles between pseudopods in chemotaxing Dictyostelium cells under different conditions and found the results agreed with the model extremely well. Our model and data together suggest that in rapidly moving cells like Dictyostelium and neutrophils an intrinsic pseudopod cycle lies at the heart of cell motility. This implies that the mechanism behind chemotaxis relies on modification of intrinsic pseudopod behaviour, more than generation of new pseudopods or actin polymerization by chemoattractants.
format Article
id doaj-art-7a1b5840aecb4bf189ba8054dbaddbb7
institution DOAJ
issn 1544-9173
1545-7885
language English
publishDate 2011-05-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS Biology
spelling doaj-art-7a1b5840aecb4bf189ba8054dbaddbb72025-08-20T03:10:07ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Biology1544-91731545-78852011-05-0195e100061810.1371/journal.pbio.1000618Chemotaxis: a feedback-based computational model robustly predicts multiple aspects of real cell behaviour.Matthew P NeilsonDouwe M VeltmanPeter J M van HaastertSteven D WebbJohn A MackenzieRobert H InsallThe mechanism of eukaryotic chemotaxis remains unclear despite intensive study. The most frequently described mechanism acts through attractants causing actin polymerization, in turn leading to pseudopod formation and cell movement. We recently proposed an alternative mechanism, supported by several lines of data, in which pseudopods are made by a self-generated cycle. If chemoattractants are present, they modulate the cycle rather than directly causing actin polymerization. The aim of this work is to test the explanatory and predictive powers of such pseudopod-based models to predict the complex behaviour of cells in chemotaxis. We have now tested the effectiveness of this mechanism using a computational model of cell movement and chemotaxis based on pseudopod autocatalysis. The model reproduces a surprisingly wide range of existing data about cell movement and chemotaxis. It simulates cell polarization and persistence without stimuli and selection of accurate pseudopods when chemoattractant gradients are present. It predicts both bias of pseudopod position in low chemoattractant gradients and--unexpectedly--lateral pseudopod initiation in high gradients. To test the predictive ability of the model, we looked for untested and novel predictions. One prediction from the model is that the angle between successive pseudopods at the front of the cell will increase in proportion to the difference between the cell's direction and the direction of the gradient. We measured the angles between pseudopods in chemotaxing Dictyostelium cells under different conditions and found the results agreed with the model extremely well. Our model and data together suggest that in rapidly moving cells like Dictyostelium and neutrophils an intrinsic pseudopod cycle lies at the heart of cell motility. This implies that the mechanism behind chemotaxis relies on modification of intrinsic pseudopod behaviour, more than generation of new pseudopods or actin polymerization by chemoattractants.https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1000618&type=printable
spellingShingle Matthew P Neilson
Douwe M Veltman
Peter J M van Haastert
Steven D Webb
John A Mackenzie
Robert H Insall
Chemotaxis: a feedback-based computational model robustly predicts multiple aspects of real cell behaviour.
PLoS Biology
title Chemotaxis: a feedback-based computational model robustly predicts multiple aspects of real cell behaviour.
title_full Chemotaxis: a feedback-based computational model robustly predicts multiple aspects of real cell behaviour.
title_fullStr Chemotaxis: a feedback-based computational model robustly predicts multiple aspects of real cell behaviour.
title_full_unstemmed Chemotaxis: a feedback-based computational model robustly predicts multiple aspects of real cell behaviour.
title_short Chemotaxis: a feedback-based computational model robustly predicts multiple aspects of real cell behaviour.
title_sort chemotaxis a feedback based computational model robustly predicts multiple aspects of real cell behaviour
url https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1000618&type=printable
work_keys_str_mv AT matthewpneilson chemotaxisafeedbackbasedcomputationalmodelrobustlypredictsmultipleaspectsofrealcellbehaviour
AT douwemveltman chemotaxisafeedbackbasedcomputationalmodelrobustlypredictsmultipleaspectsofrealcellbehaviour
AT peterjmvanhaastert chemotaxisafeedbackbasedcomputationalmodelrobustlypredictsmultipleaspectsofrealcellbehaviour
AT stevendwebb chemotaxisafeedbackbasedcomputationalmodelrobustlypredictsmultipleaspectsofrealcellbehaviour
AT johnamackenzie chemotaxisafeedbackbasedcomputationalmodelrobustlypredictsmultipleaspectsofrealcellbehaviour
AT roberthinsall chemotaxisafeedbackbasedcomputationalmodelrobustlypredictsmultipleaspectsofrealcellbehaviour