A comparative study of InGaAs/InAsSb and InAs/InAsSb strained layer superlattices

Over the past decade, InAs/InAsSb superlattices and their photodetectors have been widely studied due to their potential applications in high-performance infrared detectors. However, InAs/InAsSb superlattice-based infrared (IR) detectors suffer from a serious limitation of deficient light absorption...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: H. X. Yin, Zh. Wang, J. Zhang, Zh. Jiang, Ch. Chang, G. R. Deng, X. C. Zhou, J. Yang, W. Lei, R. B. Ji
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Materials
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmats.2025.1633165/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849245664248070144
author H. X. Yin
Zh. Wang
J. Zhang
Zh. Jiang
Ch. Chang
G. R. Deng
X. C. Zhou
J. Yang
W. Lei
R. B. Ji
author_facet H. X. Yin
Zh. Wang
J. Zhang
Zh. Jiang
Ch. Chang
G. R. Deng
X. C. Zhou
J. Yang
W. Lei
R. B. Ji
author_sort H. X. Yin
collection DOAJ
description Over the past decade, InAs/InAsSb superlattices and their photodetectors have been widely studied due to their potential applications in high-performance infrared detectors. However, InAs/InAsSb superlattice-based infrared (IR) detectors suffer from a serious limitation of deficient light absorption and the corresponding low quantum efficiency (QE). Recently, InGaAs/InAsSb type-II strained layer superlattices have been reported to have the capability to enhance the absorption of infrared light. In this study, we present a detailed comparative analysis on the optical properties, electrical properties, and detector performance of InGaAs/InAsSb and InAs/InAsSb strained layer superlattices. With the introduction of Ga into the InAs layers, the light absorption coefficient is observed to increase from 2,247 cm−1 for InAs/InAsSb superlattices to 3,442 cm−1 for InGaAs/InAsSb superlattices at the typical mid-wave infrared wavelength of 4.7 μm. However, this increase in light absorption coefficient does not boost the QE of the InGaAs/InAsSb superlattice detectors. Instead, quantum efficiency decreases from 45% for InAs/InAsSb superlattice detectors to 27% for InGaAs/InAsSb superlattice detectors at 150 K. This degradation in quantum efficiency for InGaAs/InAsSb superlattice detectors is found to be mainly caused by their poorer electrical properties, e.g., electron mobility and minority carrier lifetime. Fundamentally, the poorer electrical properties and lower quantum efficiency of InGaAs/InAsSb superlattice detectors are mainly due to the higher defect density within the materials, which is evidenced by the study of cross-sectional electron backscattered diffraction in these superlattices.
format Article
id doaj-art-7a1b1a9ea4f445a3a878b1c258fb2758
institution Kabale University
issn 2296-8016
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Materials
spelling doaj-art-7a1b1a9ea4f445a3a878b1c258fb27582025-08-20T03:58:44ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Materials2296-80162025-07-011210.3389/fmats.2025.16331651633165A comparative study of InGaAs/InAsSb and InAs/InAsSb strained layer superlatticesH. X. YinZh. WangJ. ZhangZh. JiangCh. ChangG. R. DengX. C. ZhouJ. YangW. LeiR. B. JiOver the past decade, InAs/InAsSb superlattices and their photodetectors have been widely studied due to their potential applications in high-performance infrared detectors. However, InAs/InAsSb superlattice-based infrared (IR) detectors suffer from a serious limitation of deficient light absorption and the corresponding low quantum efficiency (QE). Recently, InGaAs/InAsSb type-II strained layer superlattices have been reported to have the capability to enhance the absorption of infrared light. In this study, we present a detailed comparative analysis on the optical properties, electrical properties, and detector performance of InGaAs/InAsSb and InAs/InAsSb strained layer superlattices. With the introduction of Ga into the InAs layers, the light absorption coefficient is observed to increase from 2,247 cm−1 for InAs/InAsSb superlattices to 3,442 cm−1 for InGaAs/InAsSb superlattices at the typical mid-wave infrared wavelength of 4.7 μm. However, this increase in light absorption coefficient does not boost the QE of the InGaAs/InAsSb superlattice detectors. Instead, quantum efficiency decreases from 45% for InAs/InAsSb superlattice detectors to 27% for InGaAs/InAsSb superlattice detectors at 150 K. This degradation in quantum efficiency for InGaAs/InAsSb superlattice detectors is found to be mainly caused by their poorer electrical properties, e.g., electron mobility and minority carrier lifetime. Fundamentally, the poorer electrical properties and lower quantum efficiency of InGaAs/InAsSb superlattice detectors are mainly due to the higher defect density within the materials, which is evidenced by the study of cross-sectional electron backscattered diffraction in these superlattices.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmats.2025.1633165/fullphotodetectorssuperlatticesInGaAs/InAsSbInAs/InAsSbdefects
spellingShingle H. X. Yin
Zh. Wang
J. Zhang
Zh. Jiang
Ch. Chang
G. R. Deng
X. C. Zhou
J. Yang
W. Lei
R. B. Ji
A comparative study of InGaAs/InAsSb and InAs/InAsSb strained layer superlattices
Frontiers in Materials
photodetectors
superlattices
InGaAs/InAsSb
InAs/InAsSb
defects
title A comparative study of InGaAs/InAsSb and InAs/InAsSb strained layer superlattices
title_full A comparative study of InGaAs/InAsSb and InAs/InAsSb strained layer superlattices
title_fullStr A comparative study of InGaAs/InAsSb and InAs/InAsSb strained layer superlattices
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study of InGaAs/InAsSb and InAs/InAsSb strained layer superlattices
title_short A comparative study of InGaAs/InAsSb and InAs/InAsSb strained layer superlattices
title_sort comparative study of ingaas inassb and inas inassb strained layer superlattices
topic photodetectors
superlattices
InGaAs/InAsSb
InAs/InAsSb
defects
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmats.2025.1633165/full
work_keys_str_mv AT hxyin acomparativestudyofingaasinassbandinasinassbstrainedlayersuperlattices
AT zhwang acomparativestudyofingaasinassbandinasinassbstrainedlayersuperlattices
AT jzhang acomparativestudyofingaasinassbandinasinassbstrainedlayersuperlattices
AT zhjiang acomparativestudyofingaasinassbandinasinassbstrainedlayersuperlattices
AT chchang acomparativestudyofingaasinassbandinasinassbstrainedlayersuperlattices
AT grdeng acomparativestudyofingaasinassbandinasinassbstrainedlayersuperlattices
AT xczhou acomparativestudyofingaasinassbandinasinassbstrainedlayersuperlattices
AT jyang acomparativestudyofingaasinassbandinasinassbstrainedlayersuperlattices
AT wlei acomparativestudyofingaasinassbandinasinassbstrainedlayersuperlattices
AT rbji acomparativestudyofingaasinassbandinasinassbstrainedlayersuperlattices
AT hxyin comparativestudyofingaasinassbandinasinassbstrainedlayersuperlattices
AT zhwang comparativestudyofingaasinassbandinasinassbstrainedlayersuperlattices
AT jzhang comparativestudyofingaasinassbandinasinassbstrainedlayersuperlattices
AT zhjiang comparativestudyofingaasinassbandinasinassbstrainedlayersuperlattices
AT chchang comparativestudyofingaasinassbandinasinassbstrainedlayersuperlattices
AT grdeng comparativestudyofingaasinassbandinasinassbstrainedlayersuperlattices
AT xczhou comparativestudyofingaasinassbandinasinassbstrainedlayersuperlattices
AT jyang comparativestudyofingaasinassbandinasinassbstrainedlayersuperlattices
AT wlei comparativestudyofingaasinassbandinasinassbstrainedlayersuperlattices
AT rbji comparativestudyofingaasinassbandinasinassbstrainedlayersuperlattices