Ultrasonic cavitation did not occur in high-pressure CO2 liquid

Kuijpers’s study, published in Science under the title “Cavitation-induced reactions in high-pressure carbon dioxide,” explores the phenomenon of acoustic cavitation in high-pressure liquid CO2. However, an analysis of the study suggests that the vapor pressure within bubbles in high-pressure liquid...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sun Xiaoguang, Wan Ruonan, Lu Yigang, Yu Guangzheng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: De Gruyter 2025-04-01
Series:Nonlinear Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/nleng-2025-0112
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850199740978823168
author Sun Xiaoguang
Wan Ruonan
Lu Yigang
Yu Guangzheng
author_facet Sun Xiaoguang
Wan Ruonan
Lu Yigang
Yu Guangzheng
author_sort Sun Xiaoguang
collection DOAJ
description Kuijpers’s study, published in Science under the title “Cavitation-induced reactions in high-pressure carbon dioxide,” explores the phenomenon of acoustic cavitation in high-pressure liquid CO2. However, an analysis of the study suggests that the vapor pressure within bubbles in high-pressure liquid CO2 cannot remain constant or be balanced by static pressure, challenging the fundamental conditions required for acoustic cavitation. A critical prerequisite for cavitation is that the sound pressure must be proportional to the hydrostatic pressure, a condition that does not hold in Kuijpers’s experiments. This raises questions about the interpretation of the ultrasonic effects reported in the study, suggesting that they may not be caused by cavitation. The controversy surrounding acoustic cavitation in high-pressure CO2 is of significant academic interest, as it has implications for fields such as chemical processing, materials science, and ultrasound-assisted reactions. While the physical properties of supercritical CO2 closely resemble those of liquid CO2, experiments conducted with supercritical CO2 indicate that metal corrosion and polymer formation can occur in the absence of cavitation. Moreover, computational simulations have further demonstrated the mechanical effects of ultrasound in both liquid and supercritical CO2, reinforcing the need for a more precise understanding of the mechanisms involved.
format Article
id doaj-art-79f91f0fae634647b436450049cb28ef
institution OA Journals
issn 2192-8029
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher De Gruyter
record_format Article
series Nonlinear Engineering
spelling doaj-art-79f91f0fae634647b436450049cb28ef2025-08-20T02:12:33ZengDe GruyterNonlinear Engineering2192-80292025-04-011412880910.1515/nleng-2025-0112Ultrasonic cavitation did not occur in high-pressure CO2 liquidSun Xiaoguang0Wan Ruonan1Lu Yigang2Yu Guangzheng3College of Electronic Information Engineering, Guangzhou City University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510800, ChinaCollege of Electronic Information Engineering, Guangzhou City University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510800, ChinaCollege of Electronic Information Engineering, Guangzhou City University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510800, ChinaSchool of Physics and Optoelectronics, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510640, ChinaKuijpers’s study, published in Science under the title “Cavitation-induced reactions in high-pressure carbon dioxide,” explores the phenomenon of acoustic cavitation in high-pressure liquid CO2. However, an analysis of the study suggests that the vapor pressure within bubbles in high-pressure liquid CO2 cannot remain constant or be balanced by static pressure, challenging the fundamental conditions required for acoustic cavitation. A critical prerequisite for cavitation is that the sound pressure must be proportional to the hydrostatic pressure, a condition that does not hold in Kuijpers’s experiments. This raises questions about the interpretation of the ultrasonic effects reported in the study, suggesting that they may not be caused by cavitation. The controversy surrounding acoustic cavitation in high-pressure CO2 is of significant academic interest, as it has implications for fields such as chemical processing, materials science, and ultrasound-assisted reactions. While the physical properties of supercritical CO2 closely resemble those of liquid CO2, experiments conducted with supercritical CO2 indicate that metal corrosion and polymer formation can occur in the absence of cavitation. Moreover, computational simulations have further demonstrated the mechanical effects of ultrasound in both liquid and supercritical CO2, reinforcing the need for a more precise understanding of the mechanisms involved.https://doi.org/10.1515/nleng-2025-0112acoustic cavitationco2 (high-pressure liquid co2)co2 (supercritical co2) (polymer formation)computational simulationschemical process intensification
spellingShingle Sun Xiaoguang
Wan Ruonan
Lu Yigang
Yu Guangzheng
Ultrasonic cavitation did not occur in high-pressure CO2 liquid
Nonlinear Engineering
acoustic cavitation
co2 (high-pressure liquid co2)
co2 (supercritical co2) (polymer formation)
computational simulations
chemical process intensification
title Ultrasonic cavitation did not occur in high-pressure CO2 liquid
title_full Ultrasonic cavitation did not occur in high-pressure CO2 liquid
title_fullStr Ultrasonic cavitation did not occur in high-pressure CO2 liquid
title_full_unstemmed Ultrasonic cavitation did not occur in high-pressure CO2 liquid
title_short Ultrasonic cavitation did not occur in high-pressure CO2 liquid
title_sort ultrasonic cavitation did not occur in high pressure co2 liquid
topic acoustic cavitation
co2 (high-pressure liquid co2)
co2 (supercritical co2) (polymer formation)
computational simulations
chemical process intensification
url https://doi.org/10.1515/nleng-2025-0112
work_keys_str_mv AT sunxiaoguang ultrasoniccavitationdidnotoccurinhighpressureco2liquid
AT wanruonan ultrasoniccavitationdidnotoccurinhighpressureco2liquid
AT luyigang ultrasoniccavitationdidnotoccurinhighpressureco2liquid
AT yuguangzheng ultrasoniccavitationdidnotoccurinhighpressureco2liquid