A Study on Diagnostic Accuracy of Dipsi Method Over Traditional Oral Glucose Tolerance Test Among Antenatal Women

Introduction: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a condition of glucose intolerance during pregnancy, with potential adverse effects on both maternal and neonatal outcomes. Detecting and treating GDM early is crucial to prevent complications. Various diagnostic criteria and methods, such as the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vijayadevi Shanmugam, Dharani Sudha Gopalraj, Shruthi Nanjudappan, Rajeswari Ravindran
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: National Board of Examinations 2025-02-01
Series:National Board of Examinations Journal of Medical Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://natboard.edu.in/ejournal/articledtl?x=Ulpock9kQUxBVnlzT0JNKzFJWDBwZz09
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823859257867501568
author Vijayadevi Shanmugam
Dharani Sudha Gopalraj
Shruthi Nanjudappan
Rajeswari Ravindran
author_facet Vijayadevi Shanmugam
Dharani Sudha Gopalraj
Shruthi Nanjudappan
Rajeswari Ravindran
author_sort Vijayadevi Shanmugam
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a condition of glucose intolerance during pregnancy, with potential adverse effects on both maternal and neonatal outcomes. Detecting and treating GDM early is crucial to prevent complications. Various diagnostic criteria and methods, such as the Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group of India (DIPSI) criteria, IADPSG (International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups) have been debated for GDM screening. This study is aimed to compare the DIPSI and IADSP criteria which is widely used in India with the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and assess their diagnostic accuracy. Methods: A cross-sectional study involving 100 antenatal mothers was conducted in a tertiary care hospital. Sociodemographic data, risk assessments, gestational age, and clinical measurements (height, weight) were collected. Participants underwent both OGTT (using WHO criteria) and DIPSI tests. The blood sugar values were classified, and diagnostic accuracy was measured using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). The correlation between the two methods was also examined. Results: The study demonstrated a lower sensitivity, and a high specificity compared to OGTT (WHO criteria). A new cutoff of 120 mg/dl for DIPSI was obtained by ROC curve analysis for our study which had a specificity and sensitivity of 78.02% and 77.78% respectively. The correlation between OGTT fasting/postprandial and DIPSI measurements was weak. Conclusion: The study assessed the diagnostic accuracy of the DIPSI method compared to the OGTT, particularly in resource-constrained settings like India. Given the DIPSI method's observed low sensitivity, relying solely on it for GDM diagnosis is ill-advised. Failure to identify true positive cases could have significant clinical implications, impacting maternal and neonatal outcomes and overburdening healthcare systems. Further research with larger and diverse populations is needed to establish more accurate diagnostic thresholds for GDM using the DIPSI method or alternative criteria.
format Article
id doaj-art-79f0e221a7e94b14915dd96259504b46
institution Kabale University
issn 2583-7524
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher National Board of Examinations
record_format Article
series National Board of Examinations Journal of Medical Sciences
spelling doaj-art-79f0e221a7e94b14915dd96259504b462025-02-11T06:57:58ZengNational Board of ExaminationsNational Board of Examinations Journal of Medical Sciences2583-75242025-02-01Volume 3218819710.61770/NBEJMS.2025.v03.i02.006A Study on Diagnostic Accuracy of Dipsi Method Over Traditional Oral Glucose Tolerance Test Among Antenatal WomenVijayadevi Shanmugam0Dharani Sudha Gopalraj1Shruthi Nanjudappan2Rajeswari Ravindran3Associate Professor, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mount Zion Medical College, Pathanamthitta, KeralaAssistant Professor, Pharmacology, Madras Medical College, Chennai, Tamil NaduAssistant Professor of Gynaecological Oncology, PSG Institute of Oncology - PSG IMS&R, Coimbatore, Tamil NaduFaculty of Medicine, Preclinical Department, Universiti Kuala Lumpur Royal College of Medicine Perak (UniKL-RCMP), MalaysiaIntroduction: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a condition of glucose intolerance during pregnancy, with potential adverse effects on both maternal and neonatal outcomes. Detecting and treating GDM early is crucial to prevent complications. Various diagnostic criteria and methods, such as the Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group of India (DIPSI) criteria, IADPSG (International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups) have been debated for GDM screening. This study is aimed to compare the DIPSI and IADSP criteria which is widely used in India with the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and assess their diagnostic accuracy. Methods: A cross-sectional study involving 100 antenatal mothers was conducted in a tertiary care hospital. Sociodemographic data, risk assessments, gestational age, and clinical measurements (height, weight) were collected. Participants underwent both OGTT (using WHO criteria) and DIPSI tests. The blood sugar values were classified, and diagnostic accuracy was measured using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). The correlation between the two methods was also examined. Results: The study demonstrated a lower sensitivity, and a high specificity compared to OGTT (WHO criteria). A new cutoff of 120 mg/dl for DIPSI was obtained by ROC curve analysis for our study which had a specificity and sensitivity of 78.02% and 77.78% respectively. The correlation between OGTT fasting/postprandial and DIPSI measurements was weak. Conclusion: The study assessed the diagnostic accuracy of the DIPSI method compared to the OGTT, particularly in resource-constrained settings like India. Given the DIPSI method's observed low sensitivity, relying solely on it for GDM diagnosis is ill-advised. Failure to identify true positive cases could have significant clinical implications, impacting maternal and neonatal outcomes and overburdening healthcare systems. Further research with larger and diverse populations is needed to establish more accurate diagnostic thresholds for GDM using the DIPSI method or alternative criteria.https://natboard.edu.in/ejournal/articledtl?x=Ulpock9kQUxBVnlzT0JNKzFJWDBwZz09gestational diabetes mellitusdiagnostic accuracydipsi methodfasting and postprandial blood sugar
spellingShingle Vijayadevi Shanmugam
Dharani Sudha Gopalraj
Shruthi Nanjudappan
Rajeswari Ravindran
A Study on Diagnostic Accuracy of Dipsi Method Over Traditional Oral Glucose Tolerance Test Among Antenatal Women
National Board of Examinations Journal of Medical Sciences
gestational diabetes mellitus
diagnostic accuracy
dipsi method
fasting and postprandial blood sugar
title A Study on Diagnostic Accuracy of Dipsi Method Over Traditional Oral Glucose Tolerance Test Among Antenatal Women
title_full A Study on Diagnostic Accuracy of Dipsi Method Over Traditional Oral Glucose Tolerance Test Among Antenatal Women
title_fullStr A Study on Diagnostic Accuracy of Dipsi Method Over Traditional Oral Glucose Tolerance Test Among Antenatal Women
title_full_unstemmed A Study on Diagnostic Accuracy of Dipsi Method Over Traditional Oral Glucose Tolerance Test Among Antenatal Women
title_short A Study on Diagnostic Accuracy of Dipsi Method Over Traditional Oral Glucose Tolerance Test Among Antenatal Women
title_sort study on diagnostic accuracy of dipsi method over traditional oral glucose tolerance test among antenatal women
topic gestational diabetes mellitus
diagnostic accuracy
dipsi method
fasting and postprandial blood sugar
url https://natboard.edu.in/ejournal/articledtl?x=Ulpock9kQUxBVnlzT0JNKzFJWDBwZz09
work_keys_str_mv AT vijayadevishanmugam astudyondiagnosticaccuracyofdipsimethodovertraditionaloralglucosetolerancetestamongantenatalwomen
AT dharanisudhagopalraj astudyondiagnosticaccuracyofdipsimethodovertraditionaloralglucosetolerancetestamongantenatalwomen
AT shruthinanjudappan astudyondiagnosticaccuracyofdipsimethodovertraditionaloralglucosetolerancetestamongantenatalwomen
AT rajeswariravindran astudyondiagnosticaccuracyofdipsimethodovertraditionaloralglucosetolerancetestamongantenatalwomen
AT vijayadevishanmugam studyondiagnosticaccuracyofdipsimethodovertraditionaloralglucosetolerancetestamongantenatalwomen
AT dharanisudhagopalraj studyondiagnosticaccuracyofdipsimethodovertraditionaloralglucosetolerancetestamongantenatalwomen
AT shruthinanjudappan studyondiagnosticaccuracyofdipsimethodovertraditionaloralglucosetolerancetestamongantenatalwomen
AT rajeswariravindran studyondiagnosticaccuracyofdipsimethodovertraditionaloralglucosetolerancetestamongantenatalwomen