EFFICIENCY OF PARTIAL RESECTION OF AMPULLA OF UTERINE TUBE WITH THE FOLLOWING SALPINGOSTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH ECTOPIC PREGNANCY TO PRESERVE THEIR FERTILITY

Aim. To evaluate the efficacy of partial resection of ampulla of uterine tube followed by salpingostomy compared to salpingostomy alone in patients with tubal pregnancy. Materials and Methods. We recruited 182 females with tubal pregnancy who were then randomized to undergo either endoscopic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: LARISA E. Fetischeva, VADIM G. Mozes, IGOR S. Zakharov
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Kemerovo State Medical University 2018-03-01
Series:Фундаментальная и клиническая медицина
Subjects:
Online Access:https://fcm.kemsmu.ru/jour/article/view/79
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849344586689806336
author LARISA E. Fetischeva
VADIM G. Mozes
IGOR S. Zakharov
author_facet LARISA E. Fetischeva
VADIM G. Mozes
IGOR S. Zakharov
author_sort LARISA E. Fetischeva
collection DOAJ
description Aim. To evaluate the efficacy of partial resection of ampulla of uterine tube followed by salpingostomy compared to salpingostomy alone in patients with tubal pregnancy. Materials and Methods. We recruited 182 females with tubal pregnancy who were then randomized to undergo either endoscopic partial resection of ampulla of uterine tube followed by salpingostomy (n = 58) or endoscopic salpingostomy alone (n = 124). After 3 months, all patients underwent a second-look laparoscopy combined with hydrotubation to evaluate the outcome and Fallopian tube patency. Semi-quantitative assessment of pelvic adhesions was carried out by calculation of peritoneal adhesion index, by revised American Fertility Society classification system (r-AFS), and by modified classification of pelvic adhesions after caesarean section. In 12 months, the final outcome was evaluated by means of restored fertility and according to hysterosalpingography. Results. In 3 months postoperation, patients who underwent partial resection of ampulla of uterine tube followed by salpingostomy were characterized by higher Fallopian tube patency, lower prevalence and severity of pelvic adhesions, and lower prevalence of persistent trophoblastic disease. Single salpingostomy also showed certain advantages such as lower time of surgery and better opportunities for repeated reconstructive operations. In 12 months, restored fertility was more prevalent in patients who underwent partial resection of ampulla of uterine tube followed by salpingostomy that was in keeping with higher Fallopian tube patency. Conclusion. Partial resection of ampulla of uterine tube followed by salpingostomy is an efficient alternative to salpingostomy alone and can be used in women with tubal pregnancy to increase their chances to restore fertility.
format Article
id doaj-art-79ee86f8ea8e464dbf33eb7070b0fbaa
institution Kabale University
issn 2500-0764
2542-0941
language Russian
publishDate 2018-03-01
publisher Kemerovo State Medical University
record_format Article
series Фундаментальная и клиническая медицина
spelling doaj-art-79ee86f8ea8e464dbf33eb7070b0fbaa2025-08-20T03:42:38ZrusKemerovo State Medical UniversityФундаментальная и клиническая медицина2500-07642542-09412018-03-0131425078EFFICIENCY OF PARTIAL RESECTION OF AMPULLA OF UTERINE TUBE WITH THE FOLLOWING SALPINGOSTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH ECTOPIC PREGNANCY TO PRESERVE THEIR FERTILITYLARISA E. Fetischeva0VADIM G. Mozes1IGOR S. Zakharov2Regional Clinical Emergency HospitalKemerovo State Medical UniversityKemerovo State Medical UniversityAim. To evaluate the efficacy of partial resection of ampulla of uterine tube followed by salpingostomy compared to salpingostomy alone in patients with tubal pregnancy. Materials and Methods. We recruited 182 females with tubal pregnancy who were then randomized to undergo either endoscopic partial resection of ampulla of uterine tube followed by salpingostomy (n = 58) or endoscopic salpingostomy alone (n = 124). After 3 months, all patients underwent a second-look laparoscopy combined with hydrotubation to evaluate the outcome and Fallopian tube patency. Semi-quantitative assessment of pelvic adhesions was carried out by calculation of peritoneal adhesion index, by revised American Fertility Society classification system (r-AFS), and by modified classification of pelvic adhesions after caesarean section. In 12 months, the final outcome was evaluated by means of restored fertility and according to hysterosalpingography. Results. In 3 months postoperation, patients who underwent partial resection of ampulla of uterine tube followed by salpingostomy were characterized by higher Fallopian tube patency, lower prevalence and severity of pelvic adhesions, and lower prevalence of persistent trophoblastic disease. Single salpingostomy also showed certain advantages such as lower time of surgery and better opportunities for repeated reconstructive operations. In 12 months, restored fertility was more prevalent in patients who underwent partial resection of ampulla of uterine tube followed by salpingostomy that was in keeping with higher Fallopian tube patency. Conclusion. Partial resection of ampulla of uterine tube followed by salpingostomy is an efficient alternative to salpingostomy alone and can be used in women with tubal pregnancy to increase their chances to restore fertility.https://fcm.kemsmu.ru/jour/article/view/79внематочная беременностьсальпингостомиярезекция маточной трубынеостоматопластикаtubal pregnancysalpingostomyfallopian tube resection
spellingShingle LARISA E. Fetischeva
VADIM G. Mozes
IGOR S. Zakharov
EFFICIENCY OF PARTIAL RESECTION OF AMPULLA OF UTERINE TUBE WITH THE FOLLOWING SALPINGOSTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH ECTOPIC PREGNANCY TO PRESERVE THEIR FERTILITY
Фундаментальная и клиническая медицина
внематочная беременность
сальпингостомия
резекция маточной трубы
неостоматопластика
tubal pregnancy
salpingostomy
fallopian tube resection
title EFFICIENCY OF PARTIAL RESECTION OF AMPULLA OF UTERINE TUBE WITH THE FOLLOWING SALPINGOSTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH ECTOPIC PREGNANCY TO PRESERVE THEIR FERTILITY
title_full EFFICIENCY OF PARTIAL RESECTION OF AMPULLA OF UTERINE TUBE WITH THE FOLLOWING SALPINGOSTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH ECTOPIC PREGNANCY TO PRESERVE THEIR FERTILITY
title_fullStr EFFICIENCY OF PARTIAL RESECTION OF AMPULLA OF UTERINE TUBE WITH THE FOLLOWING SALPINGOSTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH ECTOPIC PREGNANCY TO PRESERVE THEIR FERTILITY
title_full_unstemmed EFFICIENCY OF PARTIAL RESECTION OF AMPULLA OF UTERINE TUBE WITH THE FOLLOWING SALPINGOSTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH ECTOPIC PREGNANCY TO PRESERVE THEIR FERTILITY
title_short EFFICIENCY OF PARTIAL RESECTION OF AMPULLA OF UTERINE TUBE WITH THE FOLLOWING SALPINGOSTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH ECTOPIC PREGNANCY TO PRESERVE THEIR FERTILITY
title_sort efficiency of partial resection of ampulla of uterine tube with the following salpingostomy in patients with ectopic pregnancy to preserve their fertility
topic внематочная беременность
сальпингостомия
резекция маточной трубы
неостоматопластика
tubal pregnancy
salpingostomy
fallopian tube resection
url https://fcm.kemsmu.ru/jour/article/view/79
work_keys_str_mv AT larisaefetischeva efficiencyofpartialresectionofampullaofuterinetubewiththefollowingsalpingostomyinpatientswithectopicpregnancytopreservetheirfertility
AT vadimgmozes efficiencyofpartialresectionofampullaofuterinetubewiththefollowingsalpingostomyinpatientswithectopicpregnancytopreservetheirfertility
AT igorszakharov efficiencyofpartialresectionofampullaofuterinetubewiththefollowingsalpingostomyinpatientswithectopicpregnancytopreservetheirfertility