Do Social Influence and Rationalization Determine the Use of Artificial Intelligence-ChatGPT in Higher Education Learning?
The use of AI-ChatGPT in education is a compelling topic, although research is limited due to its recent rapid development, necessitating further studies. This quantitative study used descriptive statistical analysis and involved 190 active students using ChatGPT in Indonesian higher education stud...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
IAI Ma'arif NUMetro Lampung
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | Jurnal Iqra': Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journal.iaimnumetrolampung.ac.id/index.php/ji/article/view/4858 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1841554043204272128 |
|---|---|
| author | Evamillatul Qistiyah Muhammad Sabandi |
| author_facet | Evamillatul Qistiyah Muhammad Sabandi |
| author_sort | Evamillatul Qistiyah |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
The use of AI-ChatGPT in education is a compelling topic, although research is limited due to its recent rapid development, necessitating further studies. This quantitative study used descriptive statistical analysis and involved 190 active students using ChatGPT in Indonesian higher education students. Purposive sampling was used for data collection via an online questionnaire. The gathered data were processed through partial least square technique. Purposive sampling was used for data collection via an online questionnaire. Validity was tested with Convergent and Discriminant Validity, and reliability with Cronbach's Alpha and Composite Reliability. The finding reveal that ChatGPT Use influence by social influence, rationalization, perceived usefulness, and perceived ease of use. Similarly, social influence significantly influences on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use. Rationalization also significantly influences on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use. Social Influence and Rationalization increase ChatGPT use in learning, with perceived Usefulness mediating the relationship and perceived ease of use also mediating it.
|
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-79dd619dd54d42c3b52c1991712c5329 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2527-4449 2548-7892 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-12-01 |
| publisher | IAI Ma'arif NUMetro Lampung |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Jurnal Iqra': Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan |
| spelling | doaj-art-79dd619dd54d42c3b52c1991712c53292025-01-09T03:15:35ZengIAI Ma'arif NUMetro LampungJurnal Iqra': Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan2527-44492548-78922024-12-019210.25217/ji.v9i2.4858Do Social Influence and Rationalization Determine the Use of Artificial Intelligence-ChatGPT in Higher Education Learning?Evamillatul Qistiyah0Muhammad Sabandi1Universitas Sebelas Maret, IndonesiaUniversitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia The use of AI-ChatGPT in education is a compelling topic, although research is limited due to its recent rapid development, necessitating further studies. This quantitative study used descriptive statistical analysis and involved 190 active students using ChatGPT in Indonesian higher education students. Purposive sampling was used for data collection via an online questionnaire. The gathered data were processed through partial least square technique. Purposive sampling was used for data collection via an online questionnaire. Validity was tested with Convergent and Discriminant Validity, and reliability with Cronbach's Alpha and Composite Reliability. The finding reveal that ChatGPT Use influence by social influence, rationalization, perceived usefulness, and perceived ease of use. Similarly, social influence significantly influences on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use. Rationalization also significantly influences on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use. Social Influence and Rationalization increase ChatGPT use in learning, with perceived Usefulness mediating the relationship and perceived ease of use also mediating it. https://journal.iaimnumetrolampung.ac.id/index.php/ji/article/view/4858Artificial IntelligenceTechnology Acceptance ModelChatGPT in LearningSocial Influence |
| spellingShingle | Evamillatul Qistiyah Muhammad Sabandi Do Social Influence and Rationalization Determine the Use of Artificial Intelligence-ChatGPT in Higher Education Learning? Jurnal Iqra': Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan Artificial Intelligence Technology Acceptance Model ChatGPT in Learning Social Influence |
| title | Do Social Influence and Rationalization Determine the Use of Artificial Intelligence-ChatGPT in Higher Education Learning? |
| title_full | Do Social Influence and Rationalization Determine the Use of Artificial Intelligence-ChatGPT in Higher Education Learning? |
| title_fullStr | Do Social Influence and Rationalization Determine the Use of Artificial Intelligence-ChatGPT in Higher Education Learning? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Do Social Influence and Rationalization Determine the Use of Artificial Intelligence-ChatGPT in Higher Education Learning? |
| title_short | Do Social Influence and Rationalization Determine the Use of Artificial Intelligence-ChatGPT in Higher Education Learning? |
| title_sort | do social influence and rationalization determine the use of artificial intelligence chatgpt in higher education learning |
| topic | Artificial Intelligence Technology Acceptance Model ChatGPT in Learning Social Influence |
| url | https://journal.iaimnumetrolampung.ac.id/index.php/ji/article/view/4858 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT evamillatulqistiyah dosocialinfluenceandrationalizationdeterminetheuseofartificialintelligencechatgptinhighereducationlearning AT muhammadsabandi dosocialinfluenceandrationalizationdeterminetheuseofartificialintelligencechatgptinhighereducationlearning |