Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
<h4>Background</h4>Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been recognized as a novel treatment for ulcerative colitis (UC). However, its efficacy and safety remain unclear.<h4>Objective</h4>We conducted this systematic review to assess the efficacy and safety of FMT in UC...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2016-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157259 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849431648082329600 |
|---|---|
| author | Yanqiang Shi Yiwei Dong Wenhui Huang Decong Zhu Hua Mao Peizhu Su |
| author_facet | Yanqiang Shi Yiwei Dong Wenhui Huang Decong Zhu Hua Mao Peizhu Su |
| author_sort | Yanqiang Shi |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <h4>Background</h4>Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been recognized as a novel treatment for ulcerative colitis (UC). However, its efficacy and safety remain unclear.<h4>Objective</h4>We conducted this systematic review to assess the efficacy and safety of FMT in UC.<h4>Data sources</h4>PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central, Web of Science Core Collection, and three other Chinese databases were searched for reports of FMT in UC with clear outcomes.<h4>Data extraction and synthesis</h4>We estimated pooled rates [with 95% confidence interval (CI)] of clinical remission among 15 cohort studies and clinical response among 16 cohort studies.<h4>Results</h4>Twenty five studies (2 randomized controlled trials, 15 cohort studies, and 8 case studies) with 234 UC patients were included. Overall, 41.58% (84/202) patients achieved clinical remission (CR) and 65.28% (126/193) achieved clinical response. Among the cohort studies, the pooled estimate of patients who achieved CR and clinical response were 40.5% (95% CI 24.7%-58.7%), and 66.1% (95% CI 43.7%-83.0%). Most adverse events were slight and self-resolving. The analyses of gut microbiota in 7 studies showed that FMT could increase microbiota diversity and richness, similarity, and certain change of bacterial composition.<h4>Conclusion</h4>FMT provides a promising effect for UC with few adverse events. Successful FMT may be associated with an increase in microbiota diversity and richness, similarity, and certain change of bacterial composition. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-79d5a13871c6471db609a5eef90d277d |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2016-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj-art-79d5a13871c6471db609a5eef90d277d2025-08-20T03:27:36ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01116e015725910.1371/journal.pone.0157259Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Yanqiang ShiYiwei DongWenhui HuangDecong ZhuHua MaoPeizhu Su<h4>Background</h4>Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been recognized as a novel treatment for ulcerative colitis (UC). However, its efficacy and safety remain unclear.<h4>Objective</h4>We conducted this systematic review to assess the efficacy and safety of FMT in UC.<h4>Data sources</h4>PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central, Web of Science Core Collection, and three other Chinese databases were searched for reports of FMT in UC with clear outcomes.<h4>Data extraction and synthesis</h4>We estimated pooled rates [with 95% confidence interval (CI)] of clinical remission among 15 cohort studies and clinical response among 16 cohort studies.<h4>Results</h4>Twenty five studies (2 randomized controlled trials, 15 cohort studies, and 8 case studies) with 234 UC patients were included. Overall, 41.58% (84/202) patients achieved clinical remission (CR) and 65.28% (126/193) achieved clinical response. Among the cohort studies, the pooled estimate of patients who achieved CR and clinical response were 40.5% (95% CI 24.7%-58.7%), and 66.1% (95% CI 43.7%-83.0%). Most adverse events were slight and self-resolving. The analyses of gut microbiota in 7 studies showed that FMT could increase microbiota diversity and richness, similarity, and certain change of bacterial composition.<h4>Conclusion</h4>FMT provides a promising effect for UC with few adverse events. Successful FMT may be associated with an increase in microbiota diversity and richness, similarity, and certain change of bacterial composition.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157259 |
| spellingShingle | Yanqiang Shi Yiwei Dong Wenhui Huang Decong Zhu Hua Mao Peizhu Su Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE |
| title | Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. |
| title_full | Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. |
| title_fullStr | Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. |
| title_short | Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. |
| title_sort | fecal microbiota transplantation for ulcerative colitis a systematic review and meta analysis |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157259 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT yanqiangshi fecalmicrobiotatransplantationforulcerativecolitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yiweidong fecalmicrobiotatransplantationforulcerativecolitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wenhuihuang fecalmicrobiotatransplantationforulcerativecolitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT decongzhu fecalmicrobiotatransplantationforulcerativecolitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT huamao fecalmicrobiotatransplantationforulcerativecolitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT peizhusu fecalmicrobiotatransplantationforulcerativecolitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |