De la porte de Brandebourg à La Havane : Wilder, Hitchcock et l’héritage révolutionnaire

Billy Wilder’s One, Two, Three (1961) and Alfred Hitchcock’s Topaz (1969) were not successful when released. This essay argues that in spite of this lack of critical acclaim, they are worth revisiting today: their respective plots—the former, farcical, the latter, rather nebulous—dissimulate subtle...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Julie Michot
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Association Française d'Etudes Américaines 2019-09-01
Series:Transatlantica
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/transatlantica/11864
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832580625930911744
author Julie Michot
author_facet Julie Michot
author_sort Julie Michot
collection DOAJ
description Billy Wilder’s One, Two, Three (1961) and Alfred Hitchcock’s Topaz (1969) were not successful when released. This essay argues that in spite of this lack of critical acclaim, they are worth revisiting today: their respective plots—the former, farcical, the latter, rather nebulous—dissimulate subtle ideological stances all the more unexpected because neither Wilder nor Hitchcock were known for making their political views public. The aim of this essay is to study the devices used by both whether in their script or filming, to illustrate their vision of capitalism and communism. The two directors did criticize the revolutionary heritage—but in the midst of the Cold War, they also took an unsupportive attitude towards the proposed model of their adopted country.
format Article
id doaj-art-7919f1303b664cb0a2f3936f31116576
institution Kabale University
issn 1765-2766
language English
publishDate 2019-09-01
publisher Association Française d'Etudes Américaines
record_format Article
series Transatlantica
spelling doaj-art-7919f1303b664cb0a2f3936f311165762025-01-30T10:46:28ZengAssociation Française d'Etudes AméricainesTransatlantica1765-27662019-09-01110.4000/transatlantica.11864De la porte de Brandebourg à La Havane : Wilder, Hitchcock et l’héritage révolutionnaireJulie MichotBilly Wilder’s One, Two, Three (1961) and Alfred Hitchcock’s Topaz (1969) were not successful when released. This essay argues that in spite of this lack of critical acclaim, they are worth revisiting today: their respective plots—the former, farcical, the latter, rather nebulous—dissimulate subtle ideological stances all the more unexpected because neither Wilder nor Hitchcock were known for making their political views public. The aim of this essay is to study the devices used by both whether in their script or filming, to illustrate their vision of capitalism and communism. The two directors did criticize the revolutionary heritage—but in the midst of the Cold War, they also took an unsupportive attitude towards the proposed model of their adopted country.https://journals.openedition.org/transatlantica/11864revolutionAlfred HitchcockBilly WilderTopazOneTwo
spellingShingle Julie Michot
De la porte de Brandebourg à La Havane : Wilder, Hitchcock et l’héritage révolutionnaire
Transatlantica
revolution
Alfred Hitchcock
Billy Wilder
Topaz
One
Two
title De la porte de Brandebourg à La Havane : Wilder, Hitchcock et l’héritage révolutionnaire
title_full De la porte de Brandebourg à La Havane : Wilder, Hitchcock et l’héritage révolutionnaire
title_fullStr De la porte de Brandebourg à La Havane : Wilder, Hitchcock et l’héritage révolutionnaire
title_full_unstemmed De la porte de Brandebourg à La Havane : Wilder, Hitchcock et l’héritage révolutionnaire
title_short De la porte de Brandebourg à La Havane : Wilder, Hitchcock et l’héritage révolutionnaire
title_sort de la porte de brandebourg a la havane wilder hitchcock et l heritage revolutionnaire
topic revolution
Alfred Hitchcock
Billy Wilder
Topaz
One
Two
url https://journals.openedition.org/transatlantica/11864
work_keys_str_mv AT juliemichot delaportedebrandebourgalahavanewilderhitchcocketlheritagerevolutionnaire