DESCARTES VE ÖZNE OLARAK BENLİK
In this paper, Descartes' theory of self and self-knowledge is being examined. Descartes claims that self-knowledge has a special status, and is more certain that sensory knowledge, because while it is acquired directly through an intellectual intuition, sensory knowledge is mediated. The ai...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Türk Felsefe Derneği
2003-12-01
|
| Series: | Felsefe Dünyası |
| Online Access: | https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1870191 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832571037112336384 |
|---|---|
| author | Sahabettin Yalçın |
| author_facet | Sahabettin Yalçın |
| author_sort | Sahabettin Yalçın |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | In this paper, Descartes' theory of self and self-knowledge is being examined. Descartes claims that self-knowledge has a special status, and is more certain that sensory knowledge, because while it is acquired directly through an intellectual intuition, sensory knowledge is mediated. The aim of Descartes' cogito argument is to show that self-knowledge is the most certain of all kinds of knowledge and, that because of this it is absolutely indubitable. However, as I try to show in this paper, Descartes makes unjustified deductions from the cogito argument such as that the thinking self is a simple, immortal substance. I argue that while the cogito argument proves that 'I as a subject' must exist, it does not give us any insight into the nature of this T. That is to say, the cogito argument does not show that this T is a simple, immortal, and thinking substance. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-790d274631214504972b248ef9769536 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1301-0875 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2003-12-01 |
| publisher | Türk Felsefe Derneği |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Felsefe Dünyası |
| spelling | doaj-art-790d274631214504972b248ef97695362025-02-02T13:23:46ZengTürk Felsefe DerneğiFelsefe Dünyası1301-08752003-12-01381071182040DESCARTES VE ÖZNE OLARAK BENLİKSahabettin Yalçın0Muğla Üniversitesi, Felsefe Bölümü.In this paper, Descartes' theory of self and self-knowledge is being examined. Descartes claims that self-knowledge has a special status, and is more certain that sensory knowledge, because while it is acquired directly through an intellectual intuition, sensory knowledge is mediated. The aim of Descartes' cogito argument is to show that self-knowledge is the most certain of all kinds of knowledge and, that because of this it is absolutely indubitable. However, as I try to show in this paper, Descartes makes unjustified deductions from the cogito argument such as that the thinking self is a simple, immortal substance. I argue that while the cogito argument proves that 'I as a subject' must exist, it does not give us any insight into the nature of this T. That is to say, the cogito argument does not show that this T is a simple, immortal, and thinking substance.https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1870191 |
| spellingShingle | Sahabettin Yalçın DESCARTES VE ÖZNE OLARAK BENLİK Felsefe Dünyası |
| title | DESCARTES VE ÖZNE OLARAK BENLİK |
| title_full | DESCARTES VE ÖZNE OLARAK BENLİK |
| title_fullStr | DESCARTES VE ÖZNE OLARAK BENLİK |
| title_full_unstemmed | DESCARTES VE ÖZNE OLARAK BENLİK |
| title_short | DESCARTES VE ÖZNE OLARAK BENLİK |
| title_sort | descartes ve ozne olarak benlik |
| url | https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1870191 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT sahabettinyalcın descartesveozneolarakbenlik |