Pareto Optimization for Selecting Discriminating Test Locations in Plant Breeding
Developing improved food crop cultivars requires time-consuming field trials, and the selection of experimental planting locations plays a key role. In early experiments, a plant breeder may prefer locations that have the best ability to discriminate the main genotype effects, that is, to screen the...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-04-01
|
| Series: | Agronomy |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/15/4/935 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849712505940606976 |
|---|---|
| author | Mohammadreza Kiaghadi Sigurdur Olafsson |
| author_facet | Mohammadreza Kiaghadi Sigurdur Olafsson |
| author_sort | Mohammadreza Kiaghadi |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Developing improved food crop cultivars requires time-consuming field trials, and the selection of experimental planting locations plays a key role. In early experiments, a plant breeder may prefer locations that have the best ability to discriminate the main genotype effects, that is, to screen the potential high performers from the average-to-poor cultivars. Traditionally, this discriminative ability of locations has focused on precision, but recent work suggests that some locations may be more sensitive to changes in the main genotype effect, having a higher relative discriminative value. We show that while both valuable, these are competing measures, meaning that no location maximizes both precision and the relative discriminative value, and there is a tradeoff that should be considered by breeders. We address this tradeoff by constructing a set of discriminating locations using Pareto optimization. We first identify a set of locations that cannot be improved along one measure without deteriorating the other and then expand this set by adding locations that are not significantly worse. Visualization facilitates evaluating the tradeoff and provides decision support when making choices about locations based on breeder preferences and status of the field experiments. The method is illustrated using publicly available barley data. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-78b274c7a7c54efdaafe76bf90acb8f6 |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 2073-4395 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-04-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Agronomy |
| spelling | doaj-art-78b274c7a7c54efdaafe76bf90acb8f62025-08-20T03:14:14ZengMDPI AGAgronomy2073-43952025-04-0115493510.3390/agronomy15040935Pareto Optimization for Selecting Discriminating Test Locations in Plant BreedingMohammadreza Kiaghadi0Sigurdur Olafsson1Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USADepartment of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USADeveloping improved food crop cultivars requires time-consuming field trials, and the selection of experimental planting locations plays a key role. In early experiments, a plant breeder may prefer locations that have the best ability to discriminate the main genotype effects, that is, to screen the potential high performers from the average-to-poor cultivars. Traditionally, this discriminative ability of locations has focused on precision, but recent work suggests that some locations may be more sensitive to changes in the main genotype effect, having a higher relative discriminative value. We show that while both valuable, these are competing measures, meaning that no location maximizes both precision and the relative discriminative value, and there is a tradeoff that should be considered by breeders. We address this tradeoff by constructing a set of discriminating locations using Pareto optimization. We first identify a set of locations that cannot be improved along one measure without deteriorating the other and then expand this set by adding locations that are not significantly worse. Visualization facilitates evaluating the tradeoff and provides decision support when making choices about locations based on breeder preferences and status of the field experiments. The method is illustrated using publicly available barley data.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/15/4/935multi-environmental trialstrial locationsplant breeding |
| spellingShingle | Mohammadreza Kiaghadi Sigurdur Olafsson Pareto Optimization for Selecting Discriminating Test Locations in Plant Breeding Agronomy multi-environmental trials trial locations plant breeding |
| title | Pareto Optimization for Selecting Discriminating Test Locations in Plant Breeding |
| title_full | Pareto Optimization for Selecting Discriminating Test Locations in Plant Breeding |
| title_fullStr | Pareto Optimization for Selecting Discriminating Test Locations in Plant Breeding |
| title_full_unstemmed | Pareto Optimization for Selecting Discriminating Test Locations in Plant Breeding |
| title_short | Pareto Optimization for Selecting Discriminating Test Locations in Plant Breeding |
| title_sort | pareto optimization for selecting discriminating test locations in plant breeding |
| topic | multi-environmental trials trial locations plant breeding |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/15/4/935 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mohammadrezakiaghadi paretooptimizationforselectingdiscriminatingtestlocationsinplantbreeding AT sigurdurolafsson paretooptimizationforselectingdiscriminatingtestlocationsinplantbreeding |