Osteosynthesis and radial head arthroplasty achieve comparable and favorable results in terrible triad injury: a systematic review using propensity score matching

The terrible triad literature reports data across wide ranges of patients ages and the treatment allocation for the radial head is commonly based on fracture severity. These observations raise the question of selection bias which can hinder comparative efficacy. Propensity score matching analysis ma...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: John J Heifner, Asdrubal E Rivera Dones, A Laurie Wells, Christopher W Reb, Deana M Mercer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2025-06-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Rehabilitation
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/22104917241256661
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850128867110420480
author John J Heifner
Asdrubal E Rivera Dones
A Laurie Wells
Christopher W Reb
Deana M Mercer
author_facet John J Heifner
Asdrubal E Rivera Dones
A Laurie Wells
Christopher W Reb
Deana M Mercer
author_sort John J Heifner
collection DOAJ
description The terrible triad literature reports data across wide ranges of patients ages and the treatment allocation for the radial head is commonly based on fracture severity. These observations raise the question of selection bias which can hinder comparative efficacy. Propensity score matching analysis may provide better control of patient variables and treatment allocation. We convey two conclusions from this analysis. Firstly, clinical outcome metrices were favorable for both radial head arthroplasty and open reduction internal fixation following terrible triad injury. This finding supports the recent literature which describe satisfactory outcomes for acute surgical management of these injuries. Secondly, the analysis suggests that revision rates may be lower for both treatment options than previously reported in the literature.
format Article
id doaj-art-783f579aee2b449eab04e148c809175d
institution OA Journals
issn 2210-4925
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Journal of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Rehabilitation
spelling doaj-art-783f579aee2b449eab04e148c809175d2025-08-20T02:33:09ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Rehabilitation2210-49252025-06-013210.1177/22104917241256661Osteosynthesis and radial head arthroplasty achieve comparable and favorable results in terrible triad injury: a systematic review using propensity score matchingJohn J Heifner0Asdrubal E Rivera Dones1A Laurie Wells2Christopher W Reb3Deana M Mercer4 Miami Orthopaedic Research Foundation, USA , Puerto Rico Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, , USA Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Penn State University, USA Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, , USAThe terrible triad literature reports data across wide ranges of patients ages and the treatment allocation for the radial head is commonly based on fracture severity. These observations raise the question of selection bias which can hinder comparative efficacy. Propensity score matching analysis may provide better control of patient variables and treatment allocation. We convey two conclusions from this analysis. Firstly, clinical outcome metrices were favorable for both radial head arthroplasty and open reduction internal fixation following terrible triad injury. This finding supports the recent literature which describe satisfactory outcomes for acute surgical management of these injuries. Secondly, the analysis suggests that revision rates may be lower for both treatment options than previously reported in the literature.https://doi.org/10.1177/22104917241256661
spellingShingle John J Heifner
Asdrubal E Rivera Dones
A Laurie Wells
Christopher W Reb
Deana M Mercer
Osteosynthesis and radial head arthroplasty achieve comparable and favorable results in terrible triad injury: a systematic review using propensity score matching
Journal of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Rehabilitation
title Osteosynthesis and radial head arthroplasty achieve comparable and favorable results in terrible triad injury: a systematic review using propensity score matching
title_full Osteosynthesis and radial head arthroplasty achieve comparable and favorable results in terrible triad injury: a systematic review using propensity score matching
title_fullStr Osteosynthesis and radial head arthroplasty achieve comparable and favorable results in terrible triad injury: a systematic review using propensity score matching
title_full_unstemmed Osteosynthesis and radial head arthroplasty achieve comparable and favorable results in terrible triad injury: a systematic review using propensity score matching
title_short Osteosynthesis and radial head arthroplasty achieve comparable and favorable results in terrible triad injury: a systematic review using propensity score matching
title_sort osteosynthesis and radial head arthroplasty achieve comparable and favorable results in terrible triad injury a systematic review using propensity score matching
url https://doi.org/10.1177/22104917241256661
work_keys_str_mv AT johnjheifner osteosynthesisandradialheadarthroplastyachievecomparableandfavorableresultsinterribletriadinjuryasystematicreviewusingpropensityscorematching
AT asdrubaleriveradones osteosynthesisandradialheadarthroplastyachievecomparableandfavorableresultsinterribletriadinjuryasystematicreviewusingpropensityscorematching
AT alauriewells osteosynthesisandradialheadarthroplastyachievecomparableandfavorableresultsinterribletriadinjuryasystematicreviewusingpropensityscorematching
AT christopherwreb osteosynthesisandradialheadarthroplastyachievecomparableandfavorableresultsinterribletriadinjuryasystematicreviewusingpropensityscorematching
AT deanammercer osteosynthesisandradialheadarthroplastyachievecomparableandfavorableresultsinterribletriadinjuryasystematicreviewusingpropensityscorematching