Comparative efficacy of operative versus conservative treatment for Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Abstract Background Optimal management of Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation is still debated. Our aim is to conduct a meta-analysis of clinical studies evaluating the functional outcomes of operative versus conservative treatment for Rockwood type III ACJ dislocation. Metho...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chengxin Xie, Shaohua Fan, Lin Chen, Lingqin Huang, Cong Chen, Hua Luo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2024-11-01
Series:BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-024-08100-x
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850056015758753792
author Chengxin Xie
Shaohua Fan
Lin Chen
Lingqin Huang
Cong Chen
Hua Luo
author_facet Chengxin Xie
Shaohua Fan
Lin Chen
Lingqin Huang
Cong Chen
Hua Luo
author_sort Chengxin Xie
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Optimal management of Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation is still debated. Our aim is to conduct a meta-analysis of clinical studies evaluating the functional outcomes of operative versus conservative treatment for Rockwood type III ACJ dislocation. Methods We conducted a systematic search across PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, including only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focusing exclusively on type III ACJ dislocation. A total of 244 patients from four studies were included. Outcomes measured included Constant scores (CS), coracoclavicular distance (CCD), pain, and complication rates. Heterogeneity was assessed and managed to ensure robust conclusions. Results The pooled results showed no significant difference in long-term functional outcomes, measured by CS, between surgical and conservative treatments (MD: 4.82, 95% CI: -6.42 to 16.06, P = 0.400). Surgical treatment provided better early pain relief and superior CCD at all follow-up points but did not improve long-term outcomes. Complication rates were similar for both treatments, though surgical intervention had a higher incidence of posttraumatic osteoarthritis and hardware-related issues. Conservative treatment resulted in fewer complications and comparable long-term results. Conclusions Based on the evidence, while surgical treatment may offer early benefits in pain relief and CCD improvement, it does not enhance long-term functional outcomes and is associated with higher specific complication rates. Conservative treatment provides a viable alternative with fewer complications and similar long-term outcomes. These findings highlight the need for individualized treatment plans based on patient-specific factors and suggest further high-quality, long-term studies to refine management strategies for Type III AC joint dislocations.
format Article
id doaj-art-78291d25bda343fba833fdf90df511e2
institution DOAJ
issn 1471-2474
language English
publishDate 2024-11-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
spelling doaj-art-78291d25bda343fba833fdf90df511e22025-08-20T02:51:48ZengBMCBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders1471-24742024-11-012511810.1186/s12891-024-08100-xComparative efficacy of operative versus conservative treatment for Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsChengxin Xie0Shaohua Fan1Lin Chen2Lingqin Huang3Cong Chen4Hua Luo5Department of Orthopedic, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical UniversityDepartment of Orthopedic, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical UniversityDepartment of Orthopedic, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical UniversityDepartment of Orthopedic, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical UniversityDepartment of Orthopedic, Jiangsu Province (Suqian)HospitalDepartment of Orthopedic, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical UniversityAbstract Background Optimal management of Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation is still debated. Our aim is to conduct a meta-analysis of clinical studies evaluating the functional outcomes of operative versus conservative treatment for Rockwood type III ACJ dislocation. Methods We conducted a systematic search across PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, including only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focusing exclusively on type III ACJ dislocation. A total of 244 patients from four studies were included. Outcomes measured included Constant scores (CS), coracoclavicular distance (CCD), pain, and complication rates. Heterogeneity was assessed and managed to ensure robust conclusions. Results The pooled results showed no significant difference in long-term functional outcomes, measured by CS, between surgical and conservative treatments (MD: 4.82, 95% CI: -6.42 to 16.06, P = 0.400). Surgical treatment provided better early pain relief and superior CCD at all follow-up points but did not improve long-term outcomes. Complication rates were similar for both treatments, though surgical intervention had a higher incidence of posttraumatic osteoarthritis and hardware-related issues. Conservative treatment resulted in fewer complications and comparable long-term results. Conclusions Based on the evidence, while surgical treatment may offer early benefits in pain relief and CCD improvement, it does not enhance long-term functional outcomes and is associated with higher specific complication rates. Conservative treatment provides a viable alternative with fewer complications and similar long-term outcomes. These findings highlight the need for individualized treatment plans based on patient-specific factors and suggest further high-quality, long-term studies to refine management strategies for Type III AC joint dislocations.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-024-08100-xSurgical procedureConservative treatmentRockwood type IIIAcromioclavicular joint dislocationConstant scorePain
spellingShingle Chengxin Xie
Shaohua Fan
Lin Chen
Lingqin Huang
Cong Chen
Hua Luo
Comparative efficacy of operative versus conservative treatment for Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Surgical procedure
Conservative treatment
Rockwood type III
Acromioclavicular joint dislocation
Constant score
Pain
title Comparative efficacy of operative versus conservative treatment for Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full Comparative efficacy of operative versus conservative treatment for Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Comparative efficacy of operative versus conservative treatment for Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Comparative efficacy of operative versus conservative treatment for Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_short Comparative efficacy of operative versus conservative treatment for Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_sort comparative efficacy of operative versus conservative treatment for rockwood type iii acromioclavicular joint dislocation a systematic review and meta analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic Surgical procedure
Conservative treatment
Rockwood type III
Acromioclavicular joint dislocation
Constant score
Pain
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-024-08100-x
work_keys_str_mv AT chengxinxie comparativeefficacyofoperativeversusconservativetreatmentforrockwoodtypeiiiacromioclavicularjointdislocationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT shaohuafan comparativeefficacyofoperativeversusconservativetreatmentforrockwoodtypeiiiacromioclavicularjointdislocationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT linchen comparativeefficacyofoperativeversusconservativetreatmentforrockwoodtypeiiiacromioclavicularjointdislocationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT lingqinhuang comparativeefficacyofoperativeversusconservativetreatmentforrockwoodtypeiiiacromioclavicularjointdislocationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT congchen comparativeefficacyofoperativeversusconservativetreatmentforrockwoodtypeiiiacromioclavicularjointdislocationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT hualuo comparativeefficacyofoperativeversusconservativetreatmentforrockwoodtypeiiiacromioclavicularjointdislocationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials