Understanding Factors Influencing Cycling Behaviour Among University Students and Staff: A Cross-Sectional Study

Active commuting by bicycle offers health and environmental benefits, yet it remains uncommon among university populations. This study aimed to identify key factors influencing bicycle commuting among university students and staff based on cyclist typology and to assess the applicability of the Theo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Isabel M. Martín-López, Olalla García-Taibo, Antoni Aguiló, Pere Antoni Borràs
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-04-01
Series:Social Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/14/5/261
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849718794007609344
author Isabel M. Martín-López
Olalla García-Taibo
Antoni Aguiló
Pere Antoni Borràs
author_facet Isabel M. Martín-López
Olalla García-Taibo
Antoni Aguiló
Pere Antoni Borràs
author_sort Isabel M. Martín-López
collection DOAJ
description Active commuting by bicycle offers health and environmental benefits, yet it remains uncommon among university populations. This study aimed to identify key factors influencing bicycle commuting among university students and staff based on cyclist typology and to assess the applicability of the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) and socio-ecological models. A total of 305 students and 79 staff completed a questionnaire assessing sociodemographic, psychological, social, and environmental variables. Results revealed significant differences based on cyclist typology. Urban cyclists reported fewer perceived barriers (1.96 ± 0.59) and more advantages (3.61 ± 0.40) than non-cyclists (2.71 ± 0.56 and 3.26 ± 0.49, respectively; <i>p</i> < 0.001). While personal and psychological factors were most influential for non-cyclists, environmental aspects were more relevant for urban cyclists and cyclists. Multinomial logistic regression showed that for both cyclists and urban cyclists, bicycle ownership (OR = 0.098–0.104, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and intention to use (OR = 0.091–0.358, <i>p</i> ≤ 0.02) were key predictors of cycling behaviour. Although gender was only a significant predictor for cyclists (OR = 3.41, <i>p</i> = 0.003), this variable did not influence urban cycling behaviour. These findings support using TPB and socio-ecological models to design targeted, multilevel interventions.
format Article
id doaj-art-781a7d57dde84858b29f8b32cc6d511f
institution DOAJ
issn 2076-0760
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Social Sciences
spelling doaj-art-781a7d57dde84858b29f8b32cc6d511f2025-08-20T03:12:18ZengMDPI AGSocial Sciences2076-07602025-04-0114526110.3390/socsci14050261Understanding Factors Influencing Cycling Behaviour Among University Students and Staff: A Cross-Sectional StudyIsabel M. Martín-López0Olalla García-Taibo1Antoni Aguiló2Pere Antoni Borràs3Department of Physical Activity and Sport Sciences, CESAG, Comillas Pontifical University, 07013 Palma de Mallorca, SpainDepartment of Pedagogy and Specific Didactics, Balearic Islands University, 07122 Palma de Mallorca, SpainDepartment of Nursing and Physiotherapy, Balearic Islands University, 07122 Palma de Mallorca, SpainDepartment of Pedagogy and Specific Didactics, Balearic Islands University, 07122 Palma de Mallorca, SpainActive commuting by bicycle offers health and environmental benefits, yet it remains uncommon among university populations. This study aimed to identify key factors influencing bicycle commuting among university students and staff based on cyclist typology and to assess the applicability of the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) and socio-ecological models. A total of 305 students and 79 staff completed a questionnaire assessing sociodemographic, psychological, social, and environmental variables. Results revealed significant differences based on cyclist typology. Urban cyclists reported fewer perceived barriers (1.96 ± 0.59) and more advantages (3.61 ± 0.40) than non-cyclists (2.71 ± 0.56 and 3.26 ± 0.49, respectively; <i>p</i> < 0.001). While personal and psychological factors were most influential for non-cyclists, environmental aspects were more relevant for urban cyclists and cyclists. Multinomial logistic regression showed that for both cyclists and urban cyclists, bicycle ownership (OR = 0.098–0.104, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and intention to use (OR = 0.091–0.358, <i>p</i> ≤ 0.02) were key predictors of cycling behaviour. Although gender was only a significant predictor for cyclists (OR = 3.41, <i>p</i> = 0.003), this variable did not influence urban cycling behaviour. These findings support using TPB and socio-ecological models to design targeted, multilevel interventions.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/14/5/261active transportationsustainable mobilityhealth behaviourbicyclebarriersenablers
spellingShingle Isabel M. Martín-López
Olalla García-Taibo
Antoni Aguiló
Pere Antoni Borràs
Understanding Factors Influencing Cycling Behaviour Among University Students and Staff: A Cross-Sectional Study
Social Sciences
active transportation
sustainable mobility
health behaviour
bicycle
barriers
enablers
title Understanding Factors Influencing Cycling Behaviour Among University Students and Staff: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_full Understanding Factors Influencing Cycling Behaviour Among University Students and Staff: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_fullStr Understanding Factors Influencing Cycling Behaviour Among University Students and Staff: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed Understanding Factors Influencing Cycling Behaviour Among University Students and Staff: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_short Understanding Factors Influencing Cycling Behaviour Among University Students and Staff: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_sort understanding factors influencing cycling behaviour among university students and staff a cross sectional study
topic active transportation
sustainable mobility
health behaviour
bicycle
barriers
enablers
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/14/5/261
work_keys_str_mv AT isabelmmartinlopez understandingfactorsinfluencingcyclingbehaviouramonguniversitystudentsandstaffacrosssectionalstudy
AT olallagarciataibo understandingfactorsinfluencingcyclingbehaviouramonguniversitystudentsandstaffacrosssectionalstudy
AT antoniaguilo understandingfactorsinfluencingcyclingbehaviouramonguniversitystudentsandstaffacrosssectionalstudy
AT pereantoniborras understandingfactorsinfluencingcyclingbehaviouramonguniversitystudentsandstaffacrosssectionalstudy