Global perspectives on practices and preferences in autologous free flap breast reconstruction: From flap selection to postoperative care A descriptive quantitative study

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the present-day practices in the preparation, peri-, and postoperative care for patients undergoing autologous free flap breast reconstructions (ABR) worldwide, with the aim of enhancing informed decision-making for plastic surgeons during the pl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sanderley J. Bonafastia, Lennart M. Steenbeek, Dietmar J.O. Ulrich, Stefan Hummelink
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-03-01
Series:JPRAS Open
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352587824001608
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850253724937617408
author Sanderley J. Bonafastia
Lennart M. Steenbeek
Dietmar J.O. Ulrich
Stefan Hummelink
author_facet Sanderley J. Bonafastia
Lennart M. Steenbeek
Dietmar J.O. Ulrich
Stefan Hummelink
author_sort Sanderley J. Bonafastia
collection DOAJ
description Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the present-day practices in the preparation, peri-, and postoperative care for patients undergoing autologous free flap breast reconstructions (ABR) worldwide, with the aim of enhancing informed decision-making for plastic surgeons during the planning stages of ABR. Methods: A global survey was conducted among 280 plastic surgeons and 39 plastic and reconstructive surgery societies worldwide, enquiring about flap and donor site selection, surgical actions, perforator imaging, and perioperative care during ABR. Results: Eighty-two responses were received, among which 71% (n=58) were completed questionnaires. The preferred flap of choice was the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (85%, n=51), with the internal mammary artery as the most commonly used recipient vessel. Preoperative imaging for ABR was typically performed using computed tomography angiography (75%, n=44) and often combined with a handheld Doppler. Handheld Doppler was the most frequently used modality to localize perforator vessels during surgery (33%, n=19), with the majority using either one (47%, n=24) or two (51%, n=26) perforators intraoperatively. These preferences were consistent across all clinic types.Postoperatively, flap monitoring was primarily performed by the nursing staff, initially every hour on the first day and at reduced frequencies on subsequent days.The most commonly used modality for monitoring flap viability was the handheld Doppler. The average length of hospital stay was 5 days. Conclusion: This study provides valuable insights into the current preparations and peri- and postoperative care in ABR procedures worldwide, aiding in the development of standardized practices and potentially improving patient outcomes.
format Article
id doaj-art-77fe28279bc942bea257d7fe460ad7d0
institution OA Journals
issn 2352-5878
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series JPRAS Open
spelling doaj-art-77fe28279bc942bea257d7fe460ad7d02025-08-20T01:57:19ZengElsevierJPRAS Open2352-58782025-03-014316917910.1016/j.jpra.2024.10.010Global perspectives on practices and preferences in autologous free flap breast reconstruction: From flap selection to postoperative care A descriptive quantitative studySanderley J. Bonafastia0Lennart M. Steenbeek1Dietmar J.O. Ulrich2Stefan Hummelink3Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, Sanderley; Corresponding author: Sanderley J. Bonafastia, MD, Dept. of Plastic Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, Tel: +31243619594Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, LennartRadboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, DietmarRadboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, StefanBackground: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the present-day practices in the preparation, peri-, and postoperative care for patients undergoing autologous free flap breast reconstructions (ABR) worldwide, with the aim of enhancing informed decision-making for plastic surgeons during the planning stages of ABR. Methods: A global survey was conducted among 280 plastic surgeons and 39 plastic and reconstructive surgery societies worldwide, enquiring about flap and donor site selection, surgical actions, perforator imaging, and perioperative care during ABR. Results: Eighty-two responses were received, among which 71% (n=58) were completed questionnaires. The preferred flap of choice was the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (85%, n=51), with the internal mammary artery as the most commonly used recipient vessel. Preoperative imaging for ABR was typically performed using computed tomography angiography (75%, n=44) and often combined with a handheld Doppler. Handheld Doppler was the most frequently used modality to localize perforator vessels during surgery (33%, n=19), with the majority using either one (47%, n=24) or two (51%, n=26) perforators intraoperatively. These preferences were consistent across all clinic types.Postoperatively, flap monitoring was primarily performed by the nursing staff, initially every hour on the first day and at reduced frequencies on subsequent days.The most commonly used modality for monitoring flap viability was the handheld Doppler. The average length of hospital stay was 5 days. Conclusion: This study provides valuable insights into the current preparations and peri- and postoperative care in ABR procedures worldwide, aiding in the development of standardized practices and potentially improving patient outcomes.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352587824001608Autologous breast reconstructionDeep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flapPerioperative carePerforator imagingFlap monitoring
spellingShingle Sanderley J. Bonafastia
Lennart M. Steenbeek
Dietmar J.O. Ulrich
Stefan Hummelink
Global perspectives on practices and preferences in autologous free flap breast reconstruction: From flap selection to postoperative care A descriptive quantitative study
JPRAS Open
Autologous breast reconstruction
Deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap
Perioperative care
Perforator imaging
Flap monitoring
title Global perspectives on practices and preferences in autologous free flap breast reconstruction: From flap selection to postoperative care A descriptive quantitative study
title_full Global perspectives on practices and preferences in autologous free flap breast reconstruction: From flap selection to postoperative care A descriptive quantitative study
title_fullStr Global perspectives on practices and preferences in autologous free flap breast reconstruction: From flap selection to postoperative care A descriptive quantitative study
title_full_unstemmed Global perspectives on practices and preferences in autologous free flap breast reconstruction: From flap selection to postoperative care A descriptive quantitative study
title_short Global perspectives on practices and preferences in autologous free flap breast reconstruction: From flap selection to postoperative care A descriptive quantitative study
title_sort global perspectives on practices and preferences in autologous free flap breast reconstruction from flap selection to postoperative care a descriptive quantitative study
topic Autologous breast reconstruction
Deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap
Perioperative care
Perforator imaging
Flap monitoring
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352587824001608
work_keys_str_mv AT sanderleyjbonafastia globalperspectivesonpracticesandpreferencesinautologousfreeflapbreastreconstructionfromflapselectiontopostoperativecareadescriptivequantitativestudy
AT lennartmsteenbeek globalperspectivesonpracticesandpreferencesinautologousfreeflapbreastreconstructionfromflapselectiontopostoperativecareadescriptivequantitativestudy
AT dietmarjoulrich globalperspectivesonpracticesandpreferencesinautologousfreeflapbreastreconstructionfromflapselectiontopostoperativecareadescriptivequantitativestudy
AT stefanhummelink globalperspectivesonpracticesandpreferencesinautologousfreeflapbreastreconstructionfromflapselectiontopostoperativecareadescriptivequantitativestudy