Comparison of electrocautery and conjunctivoplasty for the management of conjunctivochalasis

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of electrocautery and conjunctivoplasty with fornix suturing in managing conjunctivochalasis (CCH). Materials and Methods: A prospective interventional study was conducted including patients with symptomatic CCH who were not relieved by...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Upali Tiwari, Shruthi Tara, Geetha Ganesan, V. Rajesh Prabu, Mithun Thulasidas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2025-06-01
Series:The Pan-American Journal of Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/pajo.pajo_12_25
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849420239641509888
author Upali Tiwari
Shruthi Tara
Geetha Ganesan
V. Rajesh Prabu
Mithun Thulasidas
author_facet Upali Tiwari
Shruthi Tara
Geetha Ganesan
V. Rajesh Prabu
Mithun Thulasidas
author_sort Upali Tiwari
collection DOAJ
description Purpose: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of electrocautery and conjunctivoplasty with fornix suturing in managing conjunctivochalasis (CCH). Materials and Methods: A prospective interventional study was conducted including patients with symptomatic CCH who were not relieved by medications. Patients with CCH were divided into 2 groups. In group A, CCH reduction was done using radiofrequency electrocautery in fulguration mode. In group B, CCH reduction was done using conjunctivoplasty with fornix conjunctival suturing. Outcome measures included Schirmer’s test, tear film breakup time (TBUT), tear film height (TFH), tear meniscus area (TMA), and CCH area at day 1, day 30, and day 90. Results: One hundred eyes were included in the study (50 eyes in each group). The ST values did not show a significant difference between the groups at different postoperative periods (P = 0.42, right eye [RE]; P = 0.38, left eye [LE]). TBUT, tear meniscus height, TMA, and CCH area was significantly improved in both groups at postoperative day 90 (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the TBUT values for LE (P = 0.38) and RE (P = 0.54) between the groups. The electrocautery group showed increased TFH for both RE (P = 0.02) and LE (P = 0.01) compared to the fornix suture group. There was no significant difference in TMA between both groups for RE (P = 0.44) and LE (P = 0.37). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in CCH area between the groups for RE (P = 0.94) and LE (P = 0.89). Conclusion: Both procedures have resulted in improvement in the patient’s tear film parameters and can be chosen according to the surgeon’s preference.
format Article
id doaj-art-77a0ecbdef6e4d1ab015330f0037a293
institution Kabale University
issn 2666-4909
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series The Pan-American Journal of Ophthalmology
spelling doaj-art-77a0ecbdef6e4d1ab015330f0037a2932025-08-20T03:31:48ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsThe Pan-American Journal of Ophthalmology2666-49092025-06-017115715710.4103/pajo.pajo_12_25Comparison of electrocautery and conjunctivoplasty for the management of conjunctivochalasisUpali TiwariShruthi TaraGeetha GanesanV. Rajesh PrabuMithun ThulasidasPurpose: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of electrocautery and conjunctivoplasty with fornix suturing in managing conjunctivochalasis (CCH). Materials and Methods: A prospective interventional study was conducted including patients with symptomatic CCH who were not relieved by medications. Patients with CCH were divided into 2 groups. In group A, CCH reduction was done using radiofrequency electrocautery in fulguration mode. In group B, CCH reduction was done using conjunctivoplasty with fornix conjunctival suturing. Outcome measures included Schirmer’s test, tear film breakup time (TBUT), tear film height (TFH), tear meniscus area (TMA), and CCH area at day 1, day 30, and day 90. Results: One hundred eyes were included in the study (50 eyes in each group). The ST values did not show a significant difference between the groups at different postoperative periods (P = 0.42, right eye [RE]; P = 0.38, left eye [LE]). TBUT, tear meniscus height, TMA, and CCH area was significantly improved in both groups at postoperative day 90 (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the TBUT values for LE (P = 0.38) and RE (P = 0.54) between the groups. The electrocautery group showed increased TFH for both RE (P = 0.02) and LE (P = 0.01) compared to the fornix suture group. There was no significant difference in TMA between both groups for RE (P = 0.44) and LE (P = 0.37). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in CCH area between the groups for RE (P = 0.94) and LE (P = 0.89). Conclusion: Both procedures have resulted in improvement in the patient’s tear film parameters and can be chosen according to the surgeon’s preference.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/pajo.pajo_12_25conjunctivochalasisconjunctivoplastyforniceal conjunctival suturingradiofrequency cautery
spellingShingle Upali Tiwari
Shruthi Tara
Geetha Ganesan
V. Rajesh Prabu
Mithun Thulasidas
Comparison of electrocautery and conjunctivoplasty for the management of conjunctivochalasis
The Pan-American Journal of Ophthalmology
conjunctivochalasis
conjunctivoplasty
forniceal conjunctival suturing
radiofrequency cautery
title Comparison of electrocautery and conjunctivoplasty for the management of conjunctivochalasis
title_full Comparison of electrocautery and conjunctivoplasty for the management of conjunctivochalasis
title_fullStr Comparison of electrocautery and conjunctivoplasty for the management of conjunctivochalasis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of electrocautery and conjunctivoplasty for the management of conjunctivochalasis
title_short Comparison of electrocautery and conjunctivoplasty for the management of conjunctivochalasis
title_sort comparison of electrocautery and conjunctivoplasty for the management of conjunctivochalasis
topic conjunctivochalasis
conjunctivoplasty
forniceal conjunctival suturing
radiofrequency cautery
url https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/pajo.pajo_12_25
work_keys_str_mv AT upalitiwari comparisonofelectrocauteryandconjunctivoplastyforthemanagementofconjunctivochalasis
AT shruthitara comparisonofelectrocauteryandconjunctivoplastyforthemanagementofconjunctivochalasis
AT geethaganesan comparisonofelectrocauteryandconjunctivoplastyforthemanagementofconjunctivochalasis
AT vrajeshprabu comparisonofelectrocauteryandconjunctivoplastyforthemanagementofconjunctivochalasis
AT mithunthulasidas comparisonofelectrocauteryandconjunctivoplastyforthemanagementofconjunctivochalasis