Differences in Body Fat in Athletes Categorized by Resting Metabolic Rate

The purpose of the study was to examine differences in body fat percentage (BF%) across groups stratified by resting metabolic rate (RMR) when normalized to body weight. National Collegiate Athletic Association Division III athletes (<i>n</i> = 190; Age: 19.8 ± 1.4 year; Body Mass: 79.3...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jennifer B. Fields, Andrew T. Askow, Margaret T. Jones, Andrew R. Jagim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-10-01
Series:Applied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/14/21/9949
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850197057572175872
author Jennifer B. Fields
Andrew T. Askow
Margaret T. Jones
Andrew R. Jagim
author_facet Jennifer B. Fields
Andrew T. Askow
Margaret T. Jones
Andrew R. Jagim
author_sort Jennifer B. Fields
collection DOAJ
description The purpose of the study was to examine differences in body fat percentage (BF%) across groups stratified by resting metabolic rate (RMR) when normalized to body weight. National Collegiate Athletic Association Division III athletes (<i>n</i> = 190; Age: 19.8 ± 1.4 year; Body Mass: 79.3 ± 20.2 kg; Height: 175.0 ± 9.3 cm, Body Mass Index: 25.6 ± 4.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) participated in this cross-sectional mixed cohort study. Body composition was assessed using air displacement plethysmography. RMR was assessed using indirect calorimetry. For each sex, tertiles were determined and used to create low, moderate, and high relative RMR groups as follows: low (M: <26 kcal/kg; F: <24 kcal/kg), moderate (M: 26.1–29.0 kcal/kg; F: 24.1–27.0 kcal/kg), and high (M: >29.1 kcal/kg; F: >27.1 kcal/kg). The mean ± standard deviation RMR for male and female athletes was 27.9 ± 3.2 and 25.9 ± 2.8 kcals/kg when expressed relative to body weight. When stratified by sex, males in the low RMR group had significantly higher BF% values than those in the moderate (mean difference, [95% confidence intervals]) (7.2, [2.4, 12.0] kcal/kg; <i>p</i> < 0.01) and high RMR groups (7.7, [2.9, 12.5] kcal/kg; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Female athletes in the moderate RMR group had higher body fat percentages than those in the high RMR group (mean difference, [95% confidence intervals]) (5.8, [2.4, 9.2] kcal/kg; <i>p</i> < 0.01). Female athletes in the moderate relative RMR group had higher BF% values than those in the higher relative RMR group (3.3, [−0.1, 6.7] kcal/kg; <i>p</i> = 0.049). Both male and female athletes with a low relative RMR had a higher BF%.
format Article
id doaj-art-777b40cb5f40482fbcf1dee7f513bda3
institution OA Journals
issn 2076-3417
language English
publishDate 2024-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Applied Sciences
spelling doaj-art-777b40cb5f40482fbcf1dee7f513bda32025-08-20T02:13:16ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172024-10-011421994910.3390/app14219949Differences in Body Fat in Athletes Categorized by Resting Metabolic RateJennifer B. Fields0Andrew T. Askow1Margaret T. Jones2Andrew R. Jagim3Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USADepartment of Kinesiology and Community Health, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USAPatriot Performance Laboratory, Frank Pettrone Center for Sports Performance, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USASports Medicine, Mayo Clinic Health System, Onalaska, WI 54650, USAThe purpose of the study was to examine differences in body fat percentage (BF%) across groups stratified by resting metabolic rate (RMR) when normalized to body weight. National Collegiate Athletic Association Division III athletes (<i>n</i> = 190; Age: 19.8 ± 1.4 year; Body Mass: 79.3 ± 20.2 kg; Height: 175.0 ± 9.3 cm, Body Mass Index: 25.6 ± 4.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) participated in this cross-sectional mixed cohort study. Body composition was assessed using air displacement plethysmography. RMR was assessed using indirect calorimetry. For each sex, tertiles were determined and used to create low, moderate, and high relative RMR groups as follows: low (M: <26 kcal/kg; F: <24 kcal/kg), moderate (M: 26.1–29.0 kcal/kg; F: 24.1–27.0 kcal/kg), and high (M: >29.1 kcal/kg; F: >27.1 kcal/kg). The mean ± standard deviation RMR for male and female athletes was 27.9 ± 3.2 and 25.9 ± 2.8 kcals/kg when expressed relative to body weight. When stratified by sex, males in the low RMR group had significantly higher BF% values than those in the moderate (mean difference, [95% confidence intervals]) (7.2, [2.4, 12.0] kcal/kg; <i>p</i> < 0.01) and high RMR groups (7.7, [2.9, 12.5] kcal/kg; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Female athletes in the moderate RMR group had higher body fat percentages than those in the high RMR group (mean difference, [95% confidence intervals]) (5.8, [2.4, 9.2] kcal/kg; <i>p</i> < 0.01). Female athletes in the moderate relative RMR group had higher BF% values than those in the higher relative RMR group (3.3, [−0.1, 6.7] kcal/kg; <i>p</i> = 0.049). Both male and female athletes with a low relative RMR had a higher BF%.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/14/21/9949metabolismbody compositionsportsbody massmetabolic adaptation
spellingShingle Jennifer B. Fields
Andrew T. Askow
Margaret T. Jones
Andrew R. Jagim
Differences in Body Fat in Athletes Categorized by Resting Metabolic Rate
Applied Sciences
metabolism
body composition
sports
body mass
metabolic adaptation
title Differences in Body Fat in Athletes Categorized by Resting Metabolic Rate
title_full Differences in Body Fat in Athletes Categorized by Resting Metabolic Rate
title_fullStr Differences in Body Fat in Athletes Categorized by Resting Metabolic Rate
title_full_unstemmed Differences in Body Fat in Athletes Categorized by Resting Metabolic Rate
title_short Differences in Body Fat in Athletes Categorized by Resting Metabolic Rate
title_sort differences in body fat in athletes categorized by resting metabolic rate
topic metabolism
body composition
sports
body mass
metabolic adaptation
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/14/21/9949
work_keys_str_mv AT jenniferbfields differencesinbodyfatinathletescategorizedbyrestingmetabolicrate
AT andrewtaskow differencesinbodyfatinathletescategorizedbyrestingmetabolicrate
AT margarettjones differencesinbodyfatinathletescategorizedbyrestingmetabolicrate
AT andrewrjagim differencesinbodyfatinathletescategorizedbyrestingmetabolicrate