Validation of a Parkinson Disease Predictive Model in a Population-Based Study

Parkinson disease (PD) has a relatively long prodromal period that may permit early identification to reduce diagnostic testing for other conditions when patients are simply presenting with early PD symptoms, as well as to reduce morbidity from fall-related trauma. Earlier identification also could...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Irene M. Faust, Brad A. Racette, Susan Searles Nielsen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-01-01
Series:Parkinson's Disease
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/2857608
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850220139743543296
author Irene M. Faust
Brad A. Racette
Susan Searles Nielsen
author_facet Irene M. Faust
Brad A. Racette
Susan Searles Nielsen
author_sort Irene M. Faust
collection DOAJ
description Parkinson disease (PD) has a relatively long prodromal period that may permit early identification to reduce diagnostic testing for other conditions when patients are simply presenting with early PD symptoms, as well as to reduce morbidity from fall-related trauma. Earlier identification also could prove critical to the development of neuroprotective therapies. We previously developed a PD predictive model using demographic and Medicare claims data in a population-based case-control study. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) indicated good performance. We sought to further validate this PD predictive model. In a randomly selected, population-based cohort of 115,492 Medicare beneficiaries aged 66–90 and without PD in 2009, we applied the predictive model to claims data from the prior five years to estimate the probability of future PD diagnosis. During five years of follow-up, we used 2010–2014 Medicare data to determine PD and vital status and then Cox regression to investigate whether PD probability at baseline was associated with time to PD diagnosis. Within a nested case-control sample, we calculated the AUC, sensitivity, and specificity. A total of 2,326 beneficiaries developed PD. Probability of PD was associated with time to PD diagnosis (p<0.001, hazard ratio = 13.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 10.6–17.3 for the highest vs. lowest decile of probability). The AUC was 83.3% (95% CI 82.5%–84.1%). At the cut point that balanced sensitivity and specificity, sensitivity was 76.7% and specificity was 76.2%. In an independent sample of additional Medicare beneficiaries, we again applied the model and observed good performance (AUC = 82.2%, 95% CI 81.1%–83.3%). Administrative claims data can facilitate PD identification within Medicare and Medicare-aged samples.
format Article
id doaj-art-776c5ee1247c44be832c9e739e0076ea
institution OA Journals
issn 2090-8083
2042-0080
language English
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Parkinson's Disease
spelling doaj-art-776c5ee1247c44be832c9e739e0076ea2025-08-20T02:07:09ZengWileyParkinson's Disease2090-80832042-00802020-01-01202010.1155/2020/28576082857608Validation of a Parkinson Disease Predictive Model in a Population-Based StudyIrene M. Faust0Brad A. Racette1Susan Searles Nielsen2Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Neurology, St. Louis, Missouri, USAWashington University School of Medicine, Department of Neurology, St. Louis, Missouri, USAWashington University School of Medicine, Department of Neurology, St. Louis, Missouri, USAParkinson disease (PD) has a relatively long prodromal period that may permit early identification to reduce diagnostic testing for other conditions when patients are simply presenting with early PD symptoms, as well as to reduce morbidity from fall-related trauma. Earlier identification also could prove critical to the development of neuroprotective therapies. We previously developed a PD predictive model using demographic and Medicare claims data in a population-based case-control study. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) indicated good performance. We sought to further validate this PD predictive model. In a randomly selected, population-based cohort of 115,492 Medicare beneficiaries aged 66–90 and without PD in 2009, we applied the predictive model to claims data from the prior five years to estimate the probability of future PD diagnosis. During five years of follow-up, we used 2010–2014 Medicare data to determine PD and vital status and then Cox regression to investigate whether PD probability at baseline was associated with time to PD diagnosis. Within a nested case-control sample, we calculated the AUC, sensitivity, and specificity. A total of 2,326 beneficiaries developed PD. Probability of PD was associated with time to PD diagnosis (p<0.001, hazard ratio = 13.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 10.6–17.3 for the highest vs. lowest decile of probability). The AUC was 83.3% (95% CI 82.5%–84.1%). At the cut point that balanced sensitivity and specificity, sensitivity was 76.7% and specificity was 76.2%. In an independent sample of additional Medicare beneficiaries, we again applied the model and observed good performance (AUC = 82.2%, 95% CI 81.1%–83.3%). Administrative claims data can facilitate PD identification within Medicare and Medicare-aged samples.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/2857608
spellingShingle Irene M. Faust
Brad A. Racette
Susan Searles Nielsen
Validation of a Parkinson Disease Predictive Model in a Population-Based Study
Parkinson's Disease
title Validation of a Parkinson Disease Predictive Model in a Population-Based Study
title_full Validation of a Parkinson Disease Predictive Model in a Population-Based Study
title_fullStr Validation of a Parkinson Disease Predictive Model in a Population-Based Study
title_full_unstemmed Validation of a Parkinson Disease Predictive Model in a Population-Based Study
title_short Validation of a Parkinson Disease Predictive Model in a Population-Based Study
title_sort validation of a parkinson disease predictive model in a population based study
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/2857608
work_keys_str_mv AT irenemfaust validationofaparkinsondiseasepredictivemodelinapopulationbasedstudy
AT bradaracette validationofaparkinsondiseasepredictivemodelinapopulationbasedstudy
AT susansearlesnielsen validationofaparkinsondiseasepredictivemodelinapopulationbasedstudy