<p><strong>Efficacy </strong><strong>of </strong><strong><em>Amblyseius swirskii</em>, and <em>Neoseiulus californicus </em></strong><strong>(Acari: Phytoseiidae)</strong><strong> and acaricides </strong><strong>in controlling some pests on sweet pepper in greenhouses </strong></p>

In Egypt, serious piercing-sucking pests such as the western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis, white fly, Bemisia tabaci, the broad mite, Polyphagotarsonemus latus, and the two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae cause significant yield losses in sweet pepper crop grown in greenhouses...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ashraf said Elhalawany, Noha A. Ibrahim, Ahmad I. Amer, Asmaa R. Abdel-Khalik
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Acarological Society of Iran 2024-04-01
Series:Persian Journal of Acarology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.biotaxa.org/pja/article/view/83958
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850254743482400768
author Ashraf said Elhalawany
Noha A. Ibrahim
Ahmad I. Amer
Asmaa R. Abdel-Khalik
author_facet Ashraf said Elhalawany
Noha A. Ibrahim
Ahmad I. Amer
Asmaa R. Abdel-Khalik
author_sort Ashraf said Elhalawany
collection DOAJ
description In Egypt, serious piercing-sucking pests such as the western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis, white fly, Bemisia tabaci, the broad mite, Polyphagotarsonemus latus, and the two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae cause significant yield losses in sweet pepper crop grown in greenhouses. The purpose of this research is to assess the effectiveness of two phytoseiid mites, Amblyseius swirskii and Neoseiulus californicus, as biological control agents for piercing-sucking pests on sweet pepper in greenhouses, compared with chemical acaricides. Three release rates were assessed: 10 adults of A. swirskii/plant, 10 adults of N. californicus/plant, and 7 adults of A. swirskii + 7 adults of N. californicus combined. The highest population density of B. tabaci and F. occidentalis was on yellow ‘Qiuda’ followed by significant damage with T. urticae. Red ‘Grand bell’, on the contrary, was consistently more susceptible to T. urticae and moderately prone to whitefly infestation. Both biological and chemical pest control were efficient in reducing pest populations on sweet pepper in greenhouses. The results indicated that A. swirskii, alone or in combination with N. californicus, was more effective against F. occidentalis, B. tabaci, and P. latus on both pepper cultivars than acaricides sprayed under the same conditions. Moreover, the predatory mite, N. californicus, outperformed A. swirskii and acaricides against T. urticae. Together, the predatory mites, A. swirskii and N. californicus can improve biological control of piercing-sucking pests. The yield increased by 37.4 to 40.0% over the control treatment using the biological control candidates. Furthermore, biological control program resulted in the highest cost reductions for sweet pepper production (35.7–40.7 and 16.2–27.2%) compared to the control and acaricides treatments, as well as a safe yield free of chemical residues.
format Article
id doaj-art-7746ed7fccd54fbbae1dee1ab6a67bf6
institution OA Journals
issn 2251-8169
language English
publishDate 2024-04-01
publisher Acarological Society of Iran
record_format Article
series Persian Journal of Acarology
spelling doaj-art-7746ed7fccd54fbbae1dee1ab6a67bf62025-08-20T01:57:04ZengAcarological Society of IranPersian Journal of Acarology2251-81692024-04-0113210.22073/pja.v13i2.83958<p><strong>Efficacy </strong><strong>of </strong><strong><em>Amblyseius swirskii</em>, and <em>Neoseiulus californicus </em></strong><strong>(Acari: Phytoseiidae)</strong><strong> and acaricides </strong><strong>in controlling some pests on sweet pepper in greenhouses </strong></p>Ashraf said Elhalawany0Noha A. Ibrahim1Ahmad I. Amer2Asmaa R. Abdel-Khalik3Plant protection Research Institute Agriculture research center, Dokii, Egypt.Cotton and Field Crops Mite Department, Plant Protection Research Institute, Agricultural Research Centre, Dokii, Giza, EgyptCotton and Field Crops Mite Department, Plant Protection Research Institute, Agricultural Research Centre, Dokii, Giza, EgyptCotton and Field Crops Mite Department, Plant Protection Research Institute, Agricultural Research Centre, Dokii, Giza, Egypt In Egypt, serious piercing-sucking pests such as the western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis, white fly, Bemisia tabaci, the broad mite, Polyphagotarsonemus latus, and the two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae cause significant yield losses in sweet pepper crop grown in greenhouses. The purpose of this research is to assess the effectiveness of two phytoseiid mites, Amblyseius swirskii and Neoseiulus californicus, as biological control agents for piercing-sucking pests on sweet pepper in greenhouses, compared with chemical acaricides. Three release rates were assessed: 10 adults of A. swirskii/plant, 10 adults of N. californicus/plant, and 7 adults of A. swirskii + 7 adults of N. californicus combined. The highest population density of B. tabaci and F. occidentalis was on yellow ‘Qiuda’ followed by significant damage with T. urticae. Red ‘Grand bell’, on the contrary, was consistently more susceptible to T. urticae and moderately prone to whitefly infestation. Both biological and chemical pest control were efficient in reducing pest populations on sweet pepper in greenhouses. The results indicated that A. swirskii, alone or in combination with N. californicus, was more effective against F. occidentalis, B. tabaci, and P. latus on both pepper cultivars than acaricides sprayed under the same conditions. Moreover, the predatory mite, N. californicus, outperformed A. swirskii and acaricides against T. urticae. Together, the predatory mites, A. swirskii and N. californicus can improve biological control of piercing-sucking pests. The yield increased by 37.4 to 40.0% over the control treatment using the biological control candidates. Furthermore, biological control program resulted in the highest cost reductions for sweet pepper production (35.7–40.7 and 16.2–27.2%) compared to the control and acaricides treatments, as well as a safe yield free of chemical residues. https://www.biotaxa.org/pja/article/view/83958Biological controlbroad miteIPMphytoseiid mitesspider mitethrips
spellingShingle Ashraf said Elhalawany
Noha A. Ibrahim
Ahmad I. Amer
Asmaa R. Abdel-Khalik
<p><strong>Efficacy </strong><strong>of </strong><strong><em>Amblyseius swirskii</em>, and <em>Neoseiulus californicus </em></strong><strong>(Acari: Phytoseiidae)</strong><strong> and acaricides </strong><strong>in controlling some pests on sweet pepper in greenhouses </strong></p>
Persian Journal of Acarology
Biological control
broad mite
IPM
phytoseiid mites
spider mite
thrips
title <p><strong>Efficacy </strong><strong>of </strong><strong><em>Amblyseius swirskii</em>, and <em>Neoseiulus californicus </em></strong><strong>(Acari: Phytoseiidae)</strong><strong> and acaricides </strong><strong>in controlling some pests on sweet pepper in greenhouses </strong></p>
title_full <p><strong>Efficacy </strong><strong>of </strong><strong><em>Amblyseius swirskii</em>, and <em>Neoseiulus californicus </em></strong><strong>(Acari: Phytoseiidae)</strong><strong> and acaricides </strong><strong>in controlling some pests on sweet pepper in greenhouses </strong></p>
title_fullStr <p><strong>Efficacy </strong><strong>of </strong><strong><em>Amblyseius swirskii</em>, and <em>Neoseiulus californicus </em></strong><strong>(Acari: Phytoseiidae)</strong><strong> and acaricides </strong><strong>in controlling some pests on sweet pepper in greenhouses </strong></p>
title_full_unstemmed <p><strong>Efficacy </strong><strong>of </strong><strong><em>Amblyseius swirskii</em>, and <em>Neoseiulus californicus </em></strong><strong>(Acari: Phytoseiidae)</strong><strong> and acaricides </strong><strong>in controlling some pests on sweet pepper in greenhouses </strong></p>
title_short <p><strong>Efficacy </strong><strong>of </strong><strong><em>Amblyseius swirskii</em>, and <em>Neoseiulus californicus </em></strong><strong>(Acari: Phytoseiidae)</strong><strong> and acaricides </strong><strong>in controlling some pests on sweet pepper in greenhouses </strong></p>
title_sort p strong efficacy strong strong of strong strong em amblyseius swirskii em and em neoseiulus californicus em strong strong acari phytoseiidae strong strong and acaricides strong strong in controlling some pests on sweet pepper in greenhouses strong p
topic Biological control
broad mite
IPM
phytoseiid mites
spider mite
thrips
url https://www.biotaxa.org/pja/article/view/83958
work_keys_str_mv AT ashrafsaidelhalawany pstrongefficacystrongstrongofstrongstrongemamblyseiusswirskiiemandemneoseiuluscalifornicusemstrongstrongacariphytoseiidaestrongstrongandacaricidesstrongstrongincontrollingsomepestsonsweetpepperingreenhousesstrongp
AT nohaaibrahim pstrongefficacystrongstrongofstrongstrongemamblyseiusswirskiiemandemneoseiuluscalifornicusemstrongstrongacariphytoseiidaestrongstrongandacaricidesstrongstrongincontrollingsomepestsonsweetpepperingreenhousesstrongp
AT ahmadiamer pstrongefficacystrongstrongofstrongstrongemamblyseiusswirskiiemandemneoseiuluscalifornicusemstrongstrongacariphytoseiidaestrongstrongandacaricidesstrongstrongincontrollingsomepestsonsweetpepperingreenhousesstrongp
AT asmaarabdelkhalik pstrongefficacystrongstrongofstrongstrongemamblyseiusswirskiiemandemneoseiuluscalifornicusemstrongstrongacariphytoseiidaestrongstrongandacaricidesstrongstrongincontrollingsomepestsonsweetpepperingreenhousesstrongp