Semantics of legal concepts and natural kind terms: D. Patterson’s arguments

The paper is devoted to the analysis of the arguments of the american legal philosopher Dennis Patterson regarding the applicability of the natural kinds terms to the semantics of the legal language. Based on the Ronald Dworkin’s theory of law, reasonable criticized by D. Patterson, the features...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: A. B. Didikin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Omsk State Technical University, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education 2021-05-01
Series:Омский научный вестник: Серия "Общество. История. Современность"
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.omgtu.ru/general_information/media_omgtu/journal_of_omsk_research_journal/files/arhiv/2021/%D0%A2.%206,%20%E2%84%96%202%20(%D0%9E%D0%98%D0%A1)/94-98%20%D0%94%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%BD%20%D0%90.%20%D0%91..pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832569596960309248
author A. B. Didikin
author_facet A. B. Didikin
author_sort A. B. Didikin
collection DOAJ
description The paper is devoted to the analysis of the arguments of the american legal philosopher Dennis Patterson regarding the applicability of the natural kinds terms to the semantics of the legal language. Based on the Ronald Dworkin’s theory of law, reasonable criticized by D. Patterson, the features of the formation and interpretation of legal concepts are considered. Arguments are presented that demonstrate the content of R. Dworkin and D. Patterson’s methodological approach to the interpretation of the semantics of legal concepts as well as argumentation regarding the normativity of legal reality, the objects of which are displayed in the content of legal concepts
format Article
id doaj-art-76053d595d164fc29c07e9dbdd5d00da
institution Kabale University
issn 2542-0488
2541-7983
language English
publishDate 2021-05-01
publisher Omsk State Technical University, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education
record_format Article
series Омский научный вестник: Серия "Общество. История. Современность"
spelling doaj-art-76053d595d164fc29c07e9dbdd5d00da2025-02-02T20:00:44ZengOmsk State Technical University, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher EducationОмский научный вестник: Серия "Общество. История. Современность"2542-04882541-79832021-05-0162949810.25206/2542-0488-2021-6-2-94-98Semantics of legal concepts and natural kind terms: D. Patterson’s argumentsA. B. Didikin0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0808-8900National Research University Higher School of EconomicsThe paper is devoted to the analysis of the arguments of the american legal philosopher Dennis Patterson regarding the applicability of the natural kinds terms to the semantics of the legal language. Based on the Ronald Dworkin’s theory of law, reasonable criticized by D. Patterson, the features of the formation and interpretation of legal concepts are considered. Arguments are presented that demonstrate the content of R. Dworkin and D. Patterson’s methodological approach to the interpretation of the semantics of legal concepts as well as argumentation regarding the normativity of legal reality, the objects of which are displayed in the content of legal conceptshttps://www.omgtu.ru/general_information/media_omgtu/journal_of_omsk_research_journal/files/arhiv/2021/%D0%A2.%206,%20%E2%84%96%202%20(%D0%9E%D0%98%D0%A1)/94-98%20%D0%94%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%BD%20%D0%90.%20%D0%91..pdflegal languagelegal conceptsnormativitysemanticsnatural kindsfactslegal reality
spellingShingle A. B. Didikin
Semantics of legal concepts and natural kind terms: D. Patterson’s arguments
Омский научный вестник: Серия "Общество. История. Современность"
legal language
legal concepts
normativity
semantics
natural kinds
facts
legal reality
title Semantics of legal concepts and natural kind terms: D. Patterson’s arguments
title_full Semantics of legal concepts and natural kind terms: D. Patterson’s arguments
title_fullStr Semantics of legal concepts and natural kind terms: D. Patterson’s arguments
title_full_unstemmed Semantics of legal concepts and natural kind terms: D. Patterson’s arguments
title_short Semantics of legal concepts and natural kind terms: D. Patterson’s arguments
title_sort semantics of legal concepts and natural kind terms d patterson s arguments
topic legal language
legal concepts
normativity
semantics
natural kinds
facts
legal reality
url https://www.omgtu.ru/general_information/media_omgtu/journal_of_omsk_research_journal/files/arhiv/2021/%D0%A2.%206,%20%E2%84%96%202%20(%D0%9E%D0%98%D0%A1)/94-98%20%D0%94%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%BD%20%D0%90.%20%D0%91..pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT abdidikin semanticsoflegalconceptsandnaturalkindtermsdpattersonsarguments