Masticatory Ability for a Single Implant Mandibular Overdenture Retained by Two Different Attachments: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Objective. The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to compare the masticatory ability subjectively between ball and Cendres+Métaux Locator (CM-LOC) attachment for a single implant retained mandibular overdenture throughout a 24-month follow-up period. Materials and Methods. Eighty completely e...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2021-01-01
|
| Series: | International Journal of Dentistry |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/1632848 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832545928349745152 |
|---|---|
| author | Marwa Abdel AaL Amr Naguib Ahmed Salah Karim Foda Nora Sheta Nouran Abdel Nabi |
| author_facet | Marwa Abdel AaL Amr Naguib Ahmed Salah Karim Foda Nora Sheta Nouran Abdel Nabi |
| author_sort | Marwa Abdel AaL |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Objective. The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to compare the masticatory ability subjectively between ball and Cendres+Métaux Locator (CM-LOC) attachment for a single implant retained mandibular overdenture throughout a 24-month follow-up period. Materials and Methods. Eighty completely edentulous patients were recruited. All patients received new complete dentures, and masticatory ability was recorded using a questionnaire (baseline record). All patients received a single implant in the midline of the completely edentulous mandible. After 3-month healing period, patients were randomized using sealed envelopes into two groups: ball or CM-LOC attachment. The same masticatory ability questionnaire was used to record masticatory ability for both groups after 2 weeks of pickup and 3-, 6-, 9-, 12-, and 24-month follow-up. Comparison between the study groups was done using Mann–Whitney U test for independent samples. Two-sided P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results. The mean masticatory scores improved for both attachments, with no statistically significant difference between them throughout the 24-month follow-up. The CM-LOC attachment group showed a greater improvement change in masticatory ability after 6- and 12-month follow-up (−12.47 ± 12.006, −11.46 ± 14.625; P=0.826), while the ball attachment group showed a slight improvement after the 24-month follow-up (−11.72 ± 12.368, −10.88 ± 11.963; P=0.778). Conclusion. Single implant retained mandibular overdenture improved masticatory ability subjectively with no significant difference between both attachments used although the ball attachment showed better masticatory ability scores after 24-month follow-up. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-75e9bb86c76045e5856d4ea4e13bb6b6 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1687-8728 1687-8736 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2021-01-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | International Journal of Dentistry |
| spelling | doaj-art-75e9bb86c76045e5856d4ea4e13bb6b62025-02-03T07:24:22ZengWileyInternational Journal of Dentistry1687-87281687-87362021-01-01202110.1155/2021/16328481632848Masticatory Ability for a Single Implant Mandibular Overdenture Retained by Two Different Attachments: A Randomized Controlled TrialMarwa Abdel AaL0Amr Naguib1Ahmed Salah2Karim Foda3Nora Sheta4Nouran Abdel Nabi5Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Giza, EgyptDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Giza, EgyptDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Giza, EgyptDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Giza, EgyptDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Giza, EgyptDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Giza, EgyptObjective. The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to compare the masticatory ability subjectively between ball and Cendres+Métaux Locator (CM-LOC) attachment for a single implant retained mandibular overdenture throughout a 24-month follow-up period. Materials and Methods. Eighty completely edentulous patients were recruited. All patients received new complete dentures, and masticatory ability was recorded using a questionnaire (baseline record). All patients received a single implant in the midline of the completely edentulous mandible. After 3-month healing period, patients were randomized using sealed envelopes into two groups: ball or CM-LOC attachment. The same masticatory ability questionnaire was used to record masticatory ability for both groups after 2 weeks of pickup and 3-, 6-, 9-, 12-, and 24-month follow-up. Comparison between the study groups was done using Mann–Whitney U test for independent samples. Two-sided P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results. The mean masticatory scores improved for both attachments, with no statistically significant difference between them throughout the 24-month follow-up. The CM-LOC attachment group showed a greater improvement change in masticatory ability after 6- and 12-month follow-up (−12.47 ± 12.006, −11.46 ± 14.625; P=0.826), while the ball attachment group showed a slight improvement after the 24-month follow-up (−11.72 ± 12.368, −10.88 ± 11.963; P=0.778). Conclusion. Single implant retained mandibular overdenture improved masticatory ability subjectively with no significant difference between both attachments used although the ball attachment showed better masticatory ability scores after 24-month follow-up.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/1632848 |
| spellingShingle | Marwa Abdel AaL Amr Naguib Ahmed Salah Karim Foda Nora Sheta Nouran Abdel Nabi Masticatory Ability for a Single Implant Mandibular Overdenture Retained by Two Different Attachments: A Randomized Controlled Trial International Journal of Dentistry |
| title | Masticatory Ability for a Single Implant Mandibular Overdenture Retained by Two Different Attachments: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
| title_full | Masticatory Ability for a Single Implant Mandibular Overdenture Retained by Two Different Attachments: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
| title_fullStr | Masticatory Ability for a Single Implant Mandibular Overdenture Retained by Two Different Attachments: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
| title_full_unstemmed | Masticatory Ability for a Single Implant Mandibular Overdenture Retained by Two Different Attachments: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
| title_short | Masticatory Ability for a Single Implant Mandibular Overdenture Retained by Two Different Attachments: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
| title_sort | masticatory ability for a single implant mandibular overdenture retained by two different attachments a randomized controlled trial |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/1632848 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT marwaabdelaal masticatoryabilityforasingleimplantmandibularoverdentureretainedbytwodifferentattachmentsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT amrnaguib masticatoryabilityforasingleimplantmandibularoverdentureretainedbytwodifferentattachmentsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT ahmedsalah masticatoryabilityforasingleimplantmandibularoverdentureretainedbytwodifferentattachmentsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT karimfoda masticatoryabilityforasingleimplantmandibularoverdentureretainedbytwodifferentattachmentsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT norasheta masticatoryabilityforasingleimplantmandibularoverdentureretainedbytwodifferentattachmentsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT nouranabdelnabi masticatoryabilityforasingleimplantmandibularoverdentureretainedbytwodifferentattachmentsarandomizedcontrolledtrial |