Systematic review on evaluation tools applicable to One Health surveillance systems: A call for adapted methodology
Developing and implementing effective surveillance programs for infectious diseases (ID) and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) requires the integration of information across relevant disciplines and sectors. Yet, establishing and sustaining collaboration at each step of the surveillance process, and mo...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2025-06-01
|
| Series: | One Health |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235277142500031X |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850116956792815616 |
|---|---|
| author | Sarah Mediouni Claire Ndione E. Jane Parmley Thomas G. Poder Hélène Carabin Cécile Aenishaenslin |
| author_facet | Sarah Mediouni Claire Ndione E. Jane Parmley Thomas G. Poder Hélène Carabin Cécile Aenishaenslin |
| author_sort | Sarah Mediouni |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Developing and implementing effective surveillance programs for infectious diseases (ID) and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) requires the integration of information across relevant disciplines and sectors. Yet, establishing and sustaining collaboration at each step of the surveillance process, and modalities to translate integrated surveillance results into actions, are not well understood. This systematic review was designed to map and explore peer-reviewed tools that were either designed or used for evaluation of integrated surveillance systems for ID or AMR, and to identify the limitations of these tools and remaining methodological or knowledge gaps. A systematic search was conducted using keywords related to: “Evaluation”, “Surveillance” and “One Health” in four databases (Medline, Embase, Web of Science and CAB abstract) up to the 28th of October 2022. Articles were selected if they presented an evaluation tool for integrated surveillance systems for ID or AMR (methodological study) or an application of such a tool (case study). All selected articles went through a quality check using the MetaQAT tool. Of 25 articles retrieved, 13 presented a methodological study, while 12 described a case study. Three main types of evaluation were identified through 17 tools: theoretical, process and impact evaluations. Both methodological and case study papers predominantly considered organizational and operational aspects in their evaluation. Although costs and/or impacts were discussed in some case studies, only one article reported an economic impact analysis. Evaluation of One Health integration and multisectoral collaboration was included in four methodological and four case study articles. One major challenge identified in this systematic review is the lack of clear guidance and standardized criteria for the comprehensive evaluation of complex integrated surveillance systems. To overcome this, it is essential to develop, validate, and apply methodologies adapted to these evaluation needs. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-7594af993a8748b48ee93ee4e3e70c13 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 2352-7714 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-06-01 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | Article |
| series | One Health |
| spelling | doaj-art-7594af993a8748b48ee93ee4e3e70c132025-08-20T02:36:12ZengElsevierOne Health2352-77142025-06-012010099510.1016/j.onehlt.2025.100995Systematic review on evaluation tools applicable to One Health surveillance systems: A call for adapted methodologySarah Mediouni0Claire Ndione1E. Jane Parmley2Thomas G. Poder3Hélène Carabin4Cécile Aenishaenslin5Faculté de Médecine Vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, Canada; Groupe de Recherche en Épidémiologie des Zoonoses et Santé Publique, Université de Montréal, Canada; Centre de Recherche en Santé Publique, Université de Montréal, Canada; Corresponding author at: Faculté de Médecine Vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, Canada.École de Santé Publique, Université de Montréal, CanadaOntario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, CanadaÉcole de Santé Publique, Université de Montréal, Canada; Centre de Recherche de L'institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Montréal, CIUSSS de l'Est de l'île de Montréal, CanadaFaculté de Médecine Vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, Canada; Groupe de Recherche en Épidémiologie des Zoonoses et Santé Publique, Université de Montréal, Canada; Centre de Recherche en Santé Publique, Université de Montréal, Canada; École de Santé Publique, Université de Montréal, CanadaFaculté de Médecine Vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, Canada; Groupe de Recherche en Épidémiologie des Zoonoses et Santé Publique, Université de Montréal, Canada; Centre de Recherche en Santé Publique, Université de Montréal, Canada; École de Santé Publique, Université de Montréal, CanadaDeveloping and implementing effective surveillance programs for infectious diseases (ID) and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) requires the integration of information across relevant disciplines and sectors. Yet, establishing and sustaining collaboration at each step of the surveillance process, and modalities to translate integrated surveillance results into actions, are not well understood. This systematic review was designed to map and explore peer-reviewed tools that were either designed or used for evaluation of integrated surveillance systems for ID or AMR, and to identify the limitations of these tools and remaining methodological or knowledge gaps. A systematic search was conducted using keywords related to: “Evaluation”, “Surveillance” and “One Health” in four databases (Medline, Embase, Web of Science and CAB abstract) up to the 28th of October 2022. Articles were selected if they presented an evaluation tool for integrated surveillance systems for ID or AMR (methodological study) or an application of such a tool (case study). All selected articles went through a quality check using the MetaQAT tool. Of 25 articles retrieved, 13 presented a methodological study, while 12 described a case study. Three main types of evaluation were identified through 17 tools: theoretical, process and impact evaluations. Both methodological and case study papers predominantly considered organizational and operational aspects in their evaluation. Although costs and/or impacts were discussed in some case studies, only one article reported an economic impact analysis. Evaluation of One Health integration and multisectoral collaboration was included in four methodological and four case study articles. One major challenge identified in this systematic review is the lack of clear guidance and standardized criteria for the comprehensive evaluation of complex integrated surveillance systems. To overcome this, it is essential to develop, validate, and apply methodologies adapted to these evaluation needs.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235277142500031XOne health integrationSurveillanceAntimicrobial resistanceEvaluationInfectious diseases |
| spellingShingle | Sarah Mediouni Claire Ndione E. Jane Parmley Thomas G. Poder Hélène Carabin Cécile Aenishaenslin Systematic review on evaluation tools applicable to One Health surveillance systems: A call for adapted methodology One Health One health integration Surveillance Antimicrobial resistance Evaluation Infectious diseases |
| title | Systematic review on evaluation tools applicable to One Health surveillance systems: A call for adapted methodology |
| title_full | Systematic review on evaluation tools applicable to One Health surveillance systems: A call for adapted methodology |
| title_fullStr | Systematic review on evaluation tools applicable to One Health surveillance systems: A call for adapted methodology |
| title_full_unstemmed | Systematic review on evaluation tools applicable to One Health surveillance systems: A call for adapted methodology |
| title_short | Systematic review on evaluation tools applicable to One Health surveillance systems: A call for adapted methodology |
| title_sort | systematic review on evaluation tools applicable to one health surveillance systems a call for adapted methodology |
| topic | One health integration Surveillance Antimicrobial resistance Evaluation Infectious diseases |
| url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235277142500031X |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT sarahmediouni systematicreviewonevaluationtoolsapplicabletoonehealthsurveillancesystemsacallforadaptedmethodology AT clairendione systematicreviewonevaluationtoolsapplicabletoonehealthsurveillancesystemsacallforadaptedmethodology AT ejaneparmley systematicreviewonevaluationtoolsapplicabletoonehealthsurveillancesystemsacallforadaptedmethodology AT thomasgpoder systematicreviewonevaluationtoolsapplicabletoonehealthsurveillancesystemsacallforadaptedmethodology AT helenecarabin systematicreviewonevaluationtoolsapplicabletoonehealthsurveillancesystemsacallforadaptedmethodology AT cecileaenishaenslin systematicreviewonevaluationtoolsapplicabletoonehealthsurveillancesystemsacallforadaptedmethodology |