Self-control has a social role in primates, but not in other mammals or birds
Abstract The capacity to inhibit prepotent actions (strategic self-control) is thought to play an important role in many aspects of the behaviour of birds and mammals. Though widely considered important for foraging decisions, inhibition is also crucial for maintaining the temporal and spatial coher...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Nature Portfolio
2025-05-01
|
| Series: | Scientific Reports |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-99523-6 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849731023673229312 |
|---|---|
| author | R. I. M. Dunbar Susanne Shultz |
| author_facet | R. I. M. Dunbar Susanne Shultz |
| author_sort | R. I. M. Dunbar |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract The capacity to inhibit prepotent actions (strategic self-control) is thought to play an important role in many aspects of the behaviour of birds and mammals. Though widely considered important for foraging decisions, inhibition is also crucial for maintaining the temporal and spatial coherence of bonded social groups. We analyse four different sets of comparative experimental data on primates to show (1) that tasks widely assumed to index inhibition segregate naturally into two distinct clusters (those that involve strategic self-control and those that might be better described as detour or causal reasoning tasks) and (2) that, across primate species, the former tasks correlate better with the demands of social contexts, while the latter correlate better with the demands of foraging contexts. Finally, using a wider sample of mammals and birds, we show (3) that the capacity for (strategic) self-control is unique to anthropoid primates (as suggested by the Passingham-Wise Conjecture). We propose that strategic inhibition may be neurologically costly (and hence taxonomically rare) because animals have to model two different views of the world at the same time and prevent one leaking into the other. We conclude, first, that future studies need to examine the cognitive demands of the tasks they use more carefully and avoid misusing terms to label phenomena that involve very different demand characteristics and, second, that more attention is given to neuroimaging studies that examine the neural activity involved in different tasks. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-758907b0ad1a4b07bc4901ab7249096c |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 2045-2322 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-05-01 |
| publisher | Nature Portfolio |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Scientific Reports |
| spelling | doaj-art-758907b0ad1a4b07bc4901ab7249096c2025-08-20T03:08:40ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222025-05-0115111510.1038/s41598-025-99523-6Self-control has a social role in primates, but not in other mammals or birdsR. I. M. Dunbar0Susanne Shultz1Department of Experimental Psychology, Anna Watts Building, University of OxfordDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Michael Smith Building, University of ManchesterAbstract The capacity to inhibit prepotent actions (strategic self-control) is thought to play an important role in many aspects of the behaviour of birds and mammals. Though widely considered important for foraging decisions, inhibition is also crucial for maintaining the temporal and spatial coherence of bonded social groups. We analyse four different sets of comparative experimental data on primates to show (1) that tasks widely assumed to index inhibition segregate naturally into two distinct clusters (those that involve strategic self-control and those that might be better described as detour or causal reasoning tasks) and (2) that, across primate species, the former tasks correlate better with the demands of social contexts, while the latter correlate better with the demands of foraging contexts. Finally, using a wider sample of mammals and birds, we show (3) that the capacity for (strategic) self-control is unique to anthropoid primates (as suggested by the Passingham-Wise Conjecture). We propose that strategic inhibition may be neurologically costly (and hence taxonomically rare) because animals have to model two different views of the world at the same time and prevent one leaking into the other. We conclude, first, that future studies need to examine the cognitive demands of the tasks they use more carefully and avoid misusing terms to label phenomena that involve very different demand characteristics and, second, that more attention is given to neuroimaging studies that examine the neural activity involved in different tasks.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-99523-6PrimatesBonded social groupsSelf-controlInhibitionCausal reasoningTemporal discounting |
| spellingShingle | R. I. M. Dunbar Susanne Shultz Self-control has a social role in primates, but not in other mammals or birds Scientific Reports Primates Bonded social groups Self-control Inhibition Causal reasoning Temporal discounting |
| title | Self-control has a social role in primates, but not in other mammals or birds |
| title_full | Self-control has a social role in primates, but not in other mammals or birds |
| title_fullStr | Self-control has a social role in primates, but not in other mammals or birds |
| title_full_unstemmed | Self-control has a social role in primates, but not in other mammals or birds |
| title_short | Self-control has a social role in primates, but not in other mammals or birds |
| title_sort | self control has a social role in primates but not in other mammals or birds |
| topic | Primates Bonded social groups Self-control Inhibition Causal reasoning Temporal discounting |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-99523-6 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT rimdunbar selfcontrolhasasocialroleinprimatesbutnotinothermammalsorbirds AT susanneshultz selfcontrolhasasocialroleinprimatesbutnotinothermammalsorbirds |