Diagnostic value of methane-hydrogen breath test combined with intestinal flora testing in screening for colorectal polyps

PurposeDiagnostic value of Methane and Hydrogen Breath Test (MHBT) combined with intestinal flora detection in colorectal polyp screening.MethodsRetrospective inclusion of 196 patients who had completed MHBT with colonoscopy during the same period of time in the General Hospital of the People’s Libe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wei Wang, Hui Li, Zhihui Yan, Rui Li, Yan Zheng, Xiaohui Wang, Lihong Cui
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2025.1530558/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:PurposeDiagnostic value of Methane and Hydrogen Breath Test (MHBT) combined with intestinal flora detection in colorectal polyp screening.MethodsRetrospective inclusion of 196 patients who had completed MHBT with colonoscopy during the same period of time in the General Hospital of the People’s Liberation Army (PLA), China, from January 2022 to December 2023, were divided into a control group (no polyps) and an observation group (with polyps, n = 109). A total of 196 patients who were examined were divided into control group (without polyps, n = 109) and observation group (with polyps, n = 87). Baseline data, intestinal barrier function (DAO, D-lac, LPS), tumor markers (AFP, CA19-9, CA-125, CEA), MHBT positivity rate and relative abundance of intestinal flora were analyzed in the two groups, and diagnostic efficacy was assessed by ROC curve.ResultsThe proportion of males (64.94 vs. 49.54%) and age (61.85 ± 12.38 vs. 52.47 ± 13.57 years) in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05). After multifactorial correction, CH4 (OR = 2.32, P = 0.019) and H2 positivity (OR = 2.14, P = 0.027) remained significantly higher in the observation group. In the observation group, Bifidobacterium spp. (Bb, –15.91 ± 2.86 vs. –16.65 ± 2.13 in the control group, t = 2.075, P = 0.039), Lactobacillus spp. (Lb, –12.58 ± 3.67 vs. –15.87 ± 2.70, t = 6.988, P < 0.001), enterotoxin-producing Enterotoxin fragile mimics (ETBF, –6.02 ± 2.17 vs. 6.02 ± 2.17 vs. –6.69 ± 2.23, t = 2.122, P = 0.035), Clostridium nucleatum (Fn, –18.73 ± 2.88 vs. –21.28 ± 3.07, t = 5.984, P < 0.001) and anaerobic Streptococcus pepticus (Panaerobius, –16.23 ± 1.98 vs. – 20.30 ± 2.43, t = –2.916, P < 0.001) were significantly higher than the relative quantitative values of the control group. ROC analysis showed that the AUC for diagnosing colorectal polyps with CH4, H2 and the combined assay (CH4+H2) were 0.725, 0.640, and 0.768, respectively; and after combining the intestinal flora (Bb, Lb, Fn, etc.) AUC was elevated to 0.831, with a sensitivity of 79.27% and a specificity of 82.90%.ConclusionHBT provides a non-invasive strategy for colorectal polyp screening by capturing CH4/H2 metabolic gases with intestinal flora characteristics. Combining flora markers significantly improves diagnostic efficacy, suggesting its translational potential in optimizing screening pathways. Future exploration of the mechanisms of flora-metabolic gas dynamic interactions and individualized threshold setting is warranted.
ISSN:2296-858X