Behindert das (deutsche) Recht die zeithistorische Forschung?

Contemporary History is history that is »still smoking« (Barbara Tuchman). Since there is no smoke without fire, contemporary historical research deals with historical eras or events that continue to be widely discussed due to political controversies persisting up to the present day. Moreover, conte...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jan Thiessen
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Max Planck Institute for Legal History and Legal Theory 2023-09-01
Series:Rechtsgeschichte - Legal History
Subjects:
Online Access:https://proceedings.hpsg.xyz/index.php/rg/article/view/1989
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1823859256695193600
author Jan Thiessen
author_facet Jan Thiessen
author_sort Jan Thiessen
collection DOAJ
description Contemporary History is history that is »still smoking« (Barbara Tuchman). Since there is no smoke without fire, contemporary historical research deals with historical eras or events that continue to be widely discussed due to political controversies persisting up to the present day. Moreover, contemporary historical research is subject to numerous legal restrictions. This is particularly true for contemporary legal history. Academic freedom and freedom of information have to be weighed against personality rights and judicial independence. In that light, the article reviews essential provisions of German law regarding the legal access to historical sources, especially the Federal Archives Act, and illustrates practical issues in writing contemporary legal history.
format Article
id doaj-art-751a616dbb324760a833d5e293734577
institution Kabale University
issn 1619-4993
2195-9617
language deu
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher Max Planck Institute for Legal History and Legal Theory
record_format Article
series Rechtsgeschichte - Legal History
spelling doaj-art-751a616dbb324760a833d5e2937345772025-02-11T06:07:17ZdeuMax Planck Institute for Legal History and Legal TheoryRechtsgeschichte - Legal History1619-49932195-96172023-09-0131Behindert das (deutsche) Recht die zeithistorische Forschung?Jan Thiessen0Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Contemporary History is history that is »still smoking« (Barbara Tuchman). Since there is no smoke without fire, contemporary historical research deals with historical eras or events that continue to be widely discussed due to political controversies persisting up to the present day. Moreover, contemporary historical research is subject to numerous legal restrictions. This is particularly true for contemporary legal history. Academic freedom and freedom of information have to be weighed against personality rights and judicial independence. In that light, the article reviews essential provisions of German law regarding the legal access to historical sources, especially the Federal Archives Act, and illustrates practical issues in writing contemporary legal history. https://proceedings.hpsg.xyz/index.php/rg/article/view/1989contemporary legal historyarchival lawacademic freedomfreedom of information
spellingShingle Jan Thiessen
Behindert das (deutsche) Recht die zeithistorische Forschung?
Rechtsgeschichte - Legal History
contemporary legal history
archival law
academic freedom
freedom of information
title Behindert das (deutsche) Recht die zeithistorische Forschung?
title_full Behindert das (deutsche) Recht die zeithistorische Forschung?
title_fullStr Behindert das (deutsche) Recht die zeithistorische Forschung?
title_full_unstemmed Behindert das (deutsche) Recht die zeithistorische Forschung?
title_short Behindert das (deutsche) Recht die zeithistorische Forschung?
title_sort behindert das deutsche recht die zeithistorische forschung
topic contemporary legal history
archival law
academic freedom
freedom of information
url https://proceedings.hpsg.xyz/index.php/rg/article/view/1989
work_keys_str_mv AT janthiessen behindertdasdeutscherechtdiezeithistorischeforschung