Vrai et usage du vrai : les interactions entre fait divers et fiction romanesque au XVIIIe siècle

The rise of the novel in the eighteenth-century and the gradual recognition of its usefulness are inseparable from the growing interest it takes in factual writing. While the denial of fictionality is part of a strategy to circumvent literary norms, the valorisation of actual facts and the use of de...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Shelly Charles
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Institut du Monde Anglophone 2020-10-01
Series:Etudes Epistémè
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/episteme/6936
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849734354708725760
author Shelly Charles
author_facet Shelly Charles
author_sort Shelly Charles
collection DOAJ
description The rise of the novel in the eighteenth-century and the gradual recognition of its usefulness are inseparable from the growing interest it takes in factual writing. While the denial of fictionality is part of a strategy to circumvent literary norms, the valorisation of actual facts and the use of dedicated forms (journalism, memoirs, correspondences) play an essential part in constructing a new logic of actions and in redefining verisimilitude. Demonstrating the exemplarity of true stories and developing an appropriate documentary aesthetics henceforth become a major issue. In order to examine the evolution of the literary rewriting of facts during the century, this article provides an overview of the experiments conducted by Prévost in his journalistic work and a short description of the model later imposed by Samuel Richardson's “documentary” fiction. It is in the context of this extreme permeability between fact and fiction, that the case of a famous tragic event, the double suicide of two lovers in Lyon in 1770, and its rendering as an epistolary novel are discussed. Léonard’s Lettres de deux amants, habitants de Lyon, publiées par M. Léonard (1783), filled with allusions to Richardson, Rousseau, Goldsmith and Goethe, sheds light on the particular role played then by intertextuality (viz. the literary experiences to which the author or his characters refer) in establishing causality. Intertexts not only supply a virtual collection of “precedents” and examples, it also becomes the symptom of a generalized practice of immersive reading, likely to generate real events.
format Article
id doaj-art-7501aef769a94f908ba20178afbc75d7
institution DOAJ
issn 1634-0450
language English
publishDate 2020-10-01
publisher Institut du Monde Anglophone
record_format Article
series Etudes Epistémè
spelling doaj-art-7501aef769a94f908ba20178afbc75d72025-08-20T03:07:49ZengInstitut du Monde AnglophoneEtudes Epistémè1634-04502020-10-013710.4000/episteme.6936Vrai et usage du vrai : les interactions entre fait divers et fiction romanesque au XVIIIe siècleShelly CharlesThe rise of the novel in the eighteenth-century and the gradual recognition of its usefulness are inseparable from the growing interest it takes in factual writing. While the denial of fictionality is part of a strategy to circumvent literary norms, the valorisation of actual facts and the use of dedicated forms (journalism, memoirs, correspondences) play an essential part in constructing a new logic of actions and in redefining verisimilitude. Demonstrating the exemplarity of true stories and developing an appropriate documentary aesthetics henceforth become a major issue. In order to examine the evolution of the literary rewriting of facts during the century, this article provides an overview of the experiments conducted by Prévost in his journalistic work and a short description of the model later imposed by Samuel Richardson's “documentary” fiction. It is in the context of this extreme permeability between fact and fiction, that the case of a famous tragic event, the double suicide of two lovers in Lyon in 1770, and its rendering as an epistolary novel are discussed. Léonard’s Lettres de deux amants, habitants de Lyon, publiées par M. Léonard (1783), filled with allusions to Richardson, Rousseau, Goldsmith and Goethe, sheds light on the particular role played then by intertextuality (viz. the literary experiences to which the author or his characters refer) in establishing causality. Intertexts not only supply a virtual collection of “precedents” and examples, it also becomes the symptom of a generalized practice of immersive reading, likely to generate real events.https://journals.openedition.org/episteme/6936Fictionfactual writingintertextualityimmersive readingPrévostRichardson
spellingShingle Shelly Charles
Vrai et usage du vrai : les interactions entre fait divers et fiction romanesque au XVIIIe siècle
Etudes Epistémè
Fiction
factual writing
intertextuality
immersive reading
Prévost
Richardson
title Vrai et usage du vrai : les interactions entre fait divers et fiction romanesque au XVIIIe siècle
title_full Vrai et usage du vrai : les interactions entre fait divers et fiction romanesque au XVIIIe siècle
title_fullStr Vrai et usage du vrai : les interactions entre fait divers et fiction romanesque au XVIIIe siècle
title_full_unstemmed Vrai et usage du vrai : les interactions entre fait divers et fiction romanesque au XVIIIe siècle
title_short Vrai et usage du vrai : les interactions entre fait divers et fiction romanesque au XVIIIe siècle
title_sort vrai et usage du vrai les interactions entre fait divers et fiction romanesque au xviiie siecle
topic Fiction
factual writing
intertextuality
immersive reading
Prévost
Richardson
url https://journals.openedition.org/episteme/6936
work_keys_str_mv AT shellycharles vraietusageduvrailesinteractionsentrefaitdiversetfictionromanesqueauxviiiesiecle