Strategy Analysis of Seamlessly Resolving Turbulent Flow Simulations

Modeling of wall-bounded turbulent flows, in particular the hybridization of the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) and large eddy simulation (LES) methods, has faced serious questions for decades. Specifically, there is continuous research of how usually applied methods such as detached eddy si...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Stefan Heinz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-06-01
Series:Aerospace
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2226-4310/12/7/597
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849409593428410368
author Stefan Heinz
author_facet Stefan Heinz
author_sort Stefan Heinz
collection DOAJ
description Modeling of wall-bounded turbulent flows, in particular the hybridization of the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) and large eddy simulation (LES) methods, has faced serious questions for decades. Specifically, there is continuous research of how usually applied methods such as detached eddy simulation (DES) and wall-modeled LES (WMLES) can be made more successful in regard to complex, high-Reynolds-number (<inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mi>R</mi><mi>e</mi></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula>) flow simulations. The simple question is how it is possible to enable reliable and cost-efficient predictions of high-<inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mi>R</mi><mi>e</mi></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> wall-bounded turbulent flows in particular under conditions where data for validation are unavailable. This paper presents a strict analysis of strategies for the design of seamlessly resolving turbulent flow simulations for a wide class of turbulence models. The essential conclusions obtained are the following ones: First, by construction, usually applied methods like DES are incapable of systematically spanning the range from modeled to resolved flow simulations, which implies significant disadvantages. Second, a strict solution for this problem is given by novel continuous eddy simulation (CES) methods, which perform very well. Third, the design of a computational simplification of CES that still outperforms DES appears to be very promising.
format Article
id doaj-art-74b726fd2c7049bca3c7acf02caa4cbe
institution Kabale University
issn 2226-4310
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Aerospace
spelling doaj-art-74b726fd2c7049bca3c7acf02caa4cbe2025-08-20T03:35:27ZengMDPI AGAerospace2226-43102025-06-0112759710.3390/aerospace12070597Strategy Analysis of Seamlessly Resolving Turbulent Flow SimulationsStefan Heinz0Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Wyoming, 1000 E. University Avenue, Laramie, WY 82071, USAModeling of wall-bounded turbulent flows, in particular the hybridization of the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) and large eddy simulation (LES) methods, has faced serious questions for decades. Specifically, there is continuous research of how usually applied methods such as detached eddy simulation (DES) and wall-modeled LES (WMLES) can be made more successful in regard to complex, high-Reynolds-number (<inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mi>R</mi><mi>e</mi></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula>) flow simulations. The simple question is how it is possible to enable reliable and cost-efficient predictions of high-<inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mi>R</mi><mi>e</mi></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> wall-bounded turbulent flows in particular under conditions where data for validation are unavailable. This paper presents a strict analysis of strategies for the design of seamlessly resolving turbulent flow simulations for a wide class of turbulence models. The essential conclusions obtained are the following ones: First, by construction, usually applied methods like DES are incapable of systematically spanning the range from modeled to resolved flow simulations, which implies significant disadvantages. Second, a strict solution for this problem is given by novel continuous eddy simulation (CES) methods, which perform very well. Third, the design of a computational simplification of CES that still outperforms DES appears to be very promising.https://www.mdpi.com/2226-4310/12/7/597computational fluid dynamicslarge eddy simulation (LES)Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) methodshybrid RANS-LES methodsstrategies for resolving turbulent flow simulations
spellingShingle Stefan Heinz
Strategy Analysis of Seamlessly Resolving Turbulent Flow Simulations
Aerospace
computational fluid dynamics
large eddy simulation (LES)
Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) methods
hybrid RANS-LES methods
strategies for resolving turbulent flow simulations
title Strategy Analysis of Seamlessly Resolving Turbulent Flow Simulations
title_full Strategy Analysis of Seamlessly Resolving Turbulent Flow Simulations
title_fullStr Strategy Analysis of Seamlessly Resolving Turbulent Flow Simulations
title_full_unstemmed Strategy Analysis of Seamlessly Resolving Turbulent Flow Simulations
title_short Strategy Analysis of Seamlessly Resolving Turbulent Flow Simulations
title_sort strategy analysis of seamlessly resolving turbulent flow simulations
topic computational fluid dynamics
large eddy simulation (LES)
Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) methods
hybrid RANS-LES methods
strategies for resolving turbulent flow simulations
url https://www.mdpi.com/2226-4310/12/7/597
work_keys_str_mv AT stefanheinz strategyanalysisofseamlesslyresolvingturbulentflowsimulations