Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of SF-36 Scale in Guangdong Occupational Rehabilitation
Objective:To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of SF-36 scale in occupational rehabilitation patients in Guangdong Province.Methods:A total of 1,129 patients who participated in occupational rehabilitation were selected and filled in the SF-36 (Chinese version) by self-fil...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Editorial Office of Rehabilitation Medicine
2018-06-01
|
| Series: | 康复学报 |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://kfxb.publish.founderss.cn/thesisDetails#10.3724/SP.J.1329.2018.03012 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1841536989841588224 |
|---|---|
| author | Huiling ZHOU Bing CHEN Jiayan ZENG Xunwen LU |
| author_facet | Huiling ZHOU Bing CHEN Jiayan ZENG Xunwen LU |
| author_sort | Huiling ZHOU |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Objective:To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of SF-36 scale in occupational rehabilitation patients in Guangdong Province.Methods:A total of 1,129 patients who participated in occupational rehabilitation were selected and filled in the SF-36 (Chinese version) by self-filling or interviewing.Results:The physiologic function (RP) ICC was 0.670.Twice repeat evaluations showed that the IFC of the total and other seven dimensions were all greater than 0.75 (<italic>P</italic><0.001);The Cronbach's alpha coefficients of the total and eight dimensions were all higher than 0.7;Split-half reliability coefficient was higher than 0.6 (<italic>P</italic><0.001) and split-half reliability was higher than 0.7 in eight dimensions (<italic>P</italic><0.001).The success rate of the pooled validity was 94.3%,and the success rate of discriminant validity was 100%.Factor analysis produced a total of two common factors. Both factors were able to explain 62.724%of the total variance and had a stronger factor load (>0.4) in the corresponding project. The social function (SF) load values on the two common factors were all higher than 0.4,suggesting that the project's significance was not clear and the scale had poor structural validity in this population.Conclusion:The Chinese version of SF-36 scale has good test-retest reliability, internal reliability, half-half reliability, set and discriminant validity, and poor construct validity in occupational injury rehabilitation workers. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-74b2a73fefa94c2a8953a45ee31b2691 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2096-0328 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2018-06-01 |
| publisher | Editorial Office of Rehabilitation Medicine |
| record_format | Article |
| series | 康复学报 |
| spelling | doaj-art-74b2a73fefa94c2a8953a45ee31b26912025-01-14T10:05:02ZengEditorial Office of Rehabilitation Medicine康复学报2096-03282018-06-0128121523127256Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of SF-36 Scale in Guangdong Occupational RehabilitationHuiling ZHOUBing CHENJiayan ZENGXunwen LUObjective:To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of SF-36 scale in occupational rehabilitation patients in Guangdong Province.Methods:A total of 1,129 patients who participated in occupational rehabilitation were selected and filled in the SF-36 (Chinese version) by self-filling or interviewing.Results:The physiologic function (RP) ICC was 0.670.Twice repeat evaluations showed that the IFC of the total and other seven dimensions were all greater than 0.75 (<italic>P</italic><0.001);The Cronbach's alpha coefficients of the total and eight dimensions were all higher than 0.7;Split-half reliability coefficient was higher than 0.6 (<italic>P</italic><0.001) and split-half reliability was higher than 0.7 in eight dimensions (<italic>P</italic><0.001).The success rate of the pooled validity was 94.3%,and the success rate of discriminant validity was 100%.Factor analysis produced a total of two common factors. Both factors were able to explain 62.724%of the total variance and had a stronger factor load (>0.4) in the corresponding project. The social function (SF) load values on the two common factors were all higher than 0.4,suggesting that the project's significance was not clear and the scale had poor structural validity in this population.Conclusion:The Chinese version of SF-36 scale has good test-retest reliability, internal reliability, half-half reliability, set and discriminant validity, and poor construct validity in occupational injury rehabilitation workers.http://kfxb.publish.founderss.cn/thesisDetails#10.3724/SP.J.1329.2018.03012Chinese version of SF-36 scaleoccupational rehabilitationquality of lifereliabilityvalidity |
| spellingShingle | Huiling ZHOU Bing CHEN Jiayan ZENG Xunwen LU Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of SF-36 Scale in Guangdong Occupational Rehabilitation 康复学报 Chinese version of SF-36 scale occupational rehabilitation quality of life reliability validity |
| title | Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of SF-36 Scale in Guangdong Occupational Rehabilitation |
| title_full | Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of SF-36 Scale in Guangdong Occupational Rehabilitation |
| title_fullStr | Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of SF-36 Scale in Guangdong Occupational Rehabilitation |
| title_full_unstemmed | Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of SF-36 Scale in Guangdong Occupational Rehabilitation |
| title_short | Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of SF-36 Scale in Guangdong Occupational Rehabilitation |
| title_sort | reliability and validity of the chinese version of sf 36 scale in guangdong occupational rehabilitation |
| topic | Chinese version of SF-36 scale occupational rehabilitation quality of life reliability validity |
| url | http://kfxb.publish.founderss.cn/thesisDetails#10.3724/SP.J.1329.2018.03012 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT huilingzhou reliabilityandvalidityofthechineseversionofsf36scaleinguangdongoccupationalrehabilitation AT bingchen reliabilityandvalidityofthechineseversionofsf36scaleinguangdongoccupationalrehabilitation AT jiayanzeng reliabilityandvalidityofthechineseversionofsf36scaleinguangdongoccupationalrehabilitation AT xunwenlu reliabilityandvalidityofthechineseversionofsf36scaleinguangdongoccupationalrehabilitation |