Quality of preventive consulting on cardiovascular risk factors at primary healthcare level

Aim. To assess the quality of preventive consulting (PC) on non-communicable disease (NCD) risk factors (RF) at primary healthcare level, on the basis of medico-sociologic survey among working6age visitors of territorial ambulatory and out-patient departments.Material and methods. The study was perf...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A. M. Kalinina, A. V. Kontsevaya, M. G. Omelyanenko
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: «SILICEA-POLIGRAF» LLC 2008-02-01
Series:Кардиоваскулярная терапия и профилактика
Subjects:
Online Access:https://cardiovascular.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/1051
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849250773889712128
author A. M. Kalinina
A. V. Kontsevaya
M. G. Omelyanenko
author_facet A. M. Kalinina
A. V. Kontsevaya
M. G. Omelyanenko
author_sort A. M. Kalinina
collection DOAJ
description Aim. To assess the quality of preventive consulting (PC) on non-communicable disease (NCD) risk factors (RF) at primary healthcare level, on the basis of medico-sociologic survey among working6age visitors of territorial ambulatory and out-patient departments.Material and methods. The study was performed as a part of multi-center marketing survey of demand for doctoral PC on main NCD and their RF at two centers – territorial polyclinics in Moscow and Ivanovo. A special questionnaire was used for the survey of representative working-age patients of these polyclinics (men aged 20-59 years, women aged 20-54 years). In total, 641 subjects were included in the study.Results. Four quantitative PC quality parameters were proposed and assessed in the real-practice settings – indicators of preventive service quality (availability, accessibility, satisfaction) – RF awareness, demand for, reach of, and satisfaction by PC. The patients were inadequately aware on their own RF, with high demand and readiness for doctoral PC recommendations, and low PC reach: in every fifth case only, the already formed motivation anddemand for lifestyle modification could be satisfied.Conclusion. The study demonstrated inadequate PC quality and use of primary healthcare resources (direct patient-doctor contacts) for complex PC on main NCD RF.
format Article
id doaj-art-74b2088da87b4cfbbad96964cd502d2f
institution Kabale University
issn 1728-8800
2619-0125
language Russian
publishDate 2008-02-01
publisher «SILICEA-POLIGRAF» LLC
record_format Article
series Кардиоваскулярная терапия и профилактика
spelling doaj-art-74b2088da87b4cfbbad96964cd502d2f2025-08-20T03:57:09Zrus«SILICEA-POLIGRAF» LLCКардиоваскулярная терапия и профилактика1728-88002619-01252008-02-0171510764Quality of preventive consulting on cardiovascular risk factors at primary healthcare levelA. M. Kalinina0A. V. Kontsevaya1M. G. Omelyanenko2State Research Center for Preventive Medicine, Federal Agency on High Medical Technologies, MoscowState Research Center for Preventive Medicine, Federal Agency on High Medical Technologies, MoscowIvanovo State Medical Academy, State Federal Agency for Health and Social Development, IvanovoAim. To assess the quality of preventive consulting (PC) on non-communicable disease (NCD) risk factors (RF) at primary healthcare level, on the basis of medico-sociologic survey among working6age visitors of territorial ambulatory and out-patient departments.Material and methods. The study was performed as a part of multi-center marketing survey of demand for doctoral PC on main NCD and their RF at two centers – territorial polyclinics in Moscow and Ivanovo. A special questionnaire was used for the survey of representative working-age patients of these polyclinics (men aged 20-59 years, women aged 20-54 years). In total, 641 subjects were included in the study.Results. Four quantitative PC quality parameters were proposed and assessed in the real-practice settings – indicators of preventive service quality (availability, accessibility, satisfaction) – RF awareness, demand for, reach of, and satisfaction by PC. The patients were inadequately aware on their own RF, with high demand and readiness for doctoral PC recommendations, and low PC reach: in every fifth case only, the already formed motivation anddemand for lifestyle modification could be satisfied.Conclusion. The study demonstrated inadequate PC quality and use of primary healthcare resources (direct patient-doctor contacts) for complex PC on main NCD RF.https://cardiovascular.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/1051healthcare qualitypreventive consultingrisk factors
spellingShingle A. M. Kalinina
A. V. Kontsevaya
M. G. Omelyanenko
Quality of preventive consulting on cardiovascular risk factors at primary healthcare level
Кардиоваскулярная терапия и профилактика
healthcare quality
preventive consulting
risk factors
title Quality of preventive consulting on cardiovascular risk factors at primary healthcare level
title_full Quality of preventive consulting on cardiovascular risk factors at primary healthcare level
title_fullStr Quality of preventive consulting on cardiovascular risk factors at primary healthcare level
title_full_unstemmed Quality of preventive consulting on cardiovascular risk factors at primary healthcare level
title_short Quality of preventive consulting on cardiovascular risk factors at primary healthcare level
title_sort quality of preventive consulting on cardiovascular risk factors at primary healthcare level
topic healthcare quality
preventive consulting
risk factors
url https://cardiovascular.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/1051
work_keys_str_mv AT amkalinina qualityofpreventiveconsultingoncardiovascularriskfactorsatprimaryhealthcarelevel
AT avkontsevaya qualityofpreventiveconsultingoncardiovascularriskfactorsatprimaryhealthcarelevel
AT mgomelyanenko qualityofpreventiveconsultingoncardiovascularriskfactorsatprimaryhealthcarelevel