Comparison of noninvasive and intermittent positive pressure ventilation in treating extremely premature and extremely low birth weight infants
Objective We compared the application value of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) and intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV) in the treatment of very premature infants and extremely low birth weight infants. Methods Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to iden...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2024-10-01
|
| Series: | Journal of International Medical Research |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605241287740 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850284891394015232 |
|---|---|
| author | Huifen Chen Ming Zhang Xingyu Bai Shuang Zheng Dawei Wei Mengbin Zhang Yanxia Qiao |
| author_facet | Huifen Chen Ming Zhang Xingyu Bai Shuang Zheng Dawei Wei Mengbin Zhang Yanxia Qiao |
| author_sort | Huifen Chen |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Objective We compared the application value of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) and intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV) in the treatment of very premature infants and extremely low birth weight infants. Methods Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors influencing the transition from noninvasive to invasive ventilation in this infant cohort. Results Among extremely preterm infants, 83.3% with gestational age <25 weeks transitioned from noninvasive to invasive ventilation, as did 80.6% of those with birth weight <1000 grams. Multivariate analysis indicated that gestational age <25 weeks, birth weight <1000 grams, and Apgar score ≤7 were significant factors affecting the likelihood of transitioning to invasive ventilation. The survival rate at discharge was 94% for the NIPPV group compared with 89% for the IPPV group. The NIPPV group demonstrated significantly lower rates of complications, shorter weaning times, and reduced lengths of hospital stay compared with the IPPV group. Conclusions Both NIPPV and IPPV effectively improved oxygenation and ventilation in extremely preterm infants. However, NIPPV showed significant advantages in reducing complications, shortening weaning time, and decreasing the hospital stay duration. Prioritizing the use of NIPPV may enhance treatment outcomes and survival quality, providing evidence-based support for clinical practice. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-747e386bd5f8404e8c412ba1ee2dcb8e |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 1473-2300 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-10-01 |
| publisher | SAGE Publishing |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of International Medical Research |
| spelling | doaj-art-747e386bd5f8404e8c412ba1ee2dcb8e2025-08-20T01:47:26ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of International Medical Research1473-23002024-10-015210.1177/03000605241287740Comparison of noninvasive and intermittent positive pressure ventilation in treating extremely premature and extremely low birth weight infantsHuifen ChenMing ZhangXingyu BaiShuang ZhengDawei WeiMengbin ZhangYanxia QiaoObjective We compared the application value of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) and intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV) in the treatment of very premature infants and extremely low birth weight infants. Methods Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors influencing the transition from noninvasive to invasive ventilation in this infant cohort. Results Among extremely preterm infants, 83.3% with gestational age <25 weeks transitioned from noninvasive to invasive ventilation, as did 80.6% of those with birth weight <1000 grams. Multivariate analysis indicated that gestational age <25 weeks, birth weight <1000 grams, and Apgar score ≤7 were significant factors affecting the likelihood of transitioning to invasive ventilation. The survival rate at discharge was 94% for the NIPPV group compared with 89% for the IPPV group. The NIPPV group demonstrated significantly lower rates of complications, shorter weaning times, and reduced lengths of hospital stay compared with the IPPV group. Conclusions Both NIPPV and IPPV effectively improved oxygenation and ventilation in extremely preterm infants. However, NIPPV showed significant advantages in reducing complications, shortening weaning time, and decreasing the hospital stay duration. Prioritizing the use of NIPPV may enhance treatment outcomes and survival quality, providing evidence-based support for clinical practice.https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605241287740 |
| spellingShingle | Huifen Chen Ming Zhang Xingyu Bai Shuang Zheng Dawei Wei Mengbin Zhang Yanxia Qiao Comparison of noninvasive and intermittent positive pressure ventilation in treating extremely premature and extremely low birth weight infants Journal of International Medical Research |
| title | Comparison of noninvasive and intermittent positive pressure ventilation in treating extremely premature and extremely low birth weight infants |
| title_full | Comparison of noninvasive and intermittent positive pressure ventilation in treating extremely premature and extremely low birth weight infants |
| title_fullStr | Comparison of noninvasive and intermittent positive pressure ventilation in treating extremely premature and extremely low birth weight infants |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of noninvasive and intermittent positive pressure ventilation in treating extremely premature and extremely low birth weight infants |
| title_short | Comparison of noninvasive and intermittent positive pressure ventilation in treating extremely premature and extremely low birth weight infants |
| title_sort | comparison of noninvasive and intermittent positive pressure ventilation in treating extremely premature and extremely low birth weight infants |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605241287740 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT huifenchen comparisonofnoninvasiveandintermittentpositivepressureventilationintreatingextremelyprematureandextremelylowbirthweightinfants AT mingzhang comparisonofnoninvasiveandintermittentpositivepressureventilationintreatingextremelyprematureandextremelylowbirthweightinfants AT xingyubai comparisonofnoninvasiveandintermittentpositivepressureventilationintreatingextremelyprematureandextremelylowbirthweightinfants AT shuangzheng comparisonofnoninvasiveandintermittentpositivepressureventilationintreatingextremelyprematureandextremelylowbirthweightinfants AT daweiwei comparisonofnoninvasiveandintermittentpositivepressureventilationintreatingextremelyprematureandextremelylowbirthweightinfants AT mengbinzhang comparisonofnoninvasiveandintermittentpositivepressureventilationintreatingextremelyprematureandextremelylowbirthweightinfants AT yanxiaqiao comparisonofnoninvasiveandintermittentpositivepressureventilationintreatingextremelyprematureandextremelylowbirthweightinfants |