The Internal Heterogeneity of Carbon Emissions in Megacities: A Case Study of Beijing, China

Cities are of wide concern to scholars due to their major share of global carbon emissions. Energy-related carbon emissions differ significantly among cities, especially megacities, due to regional heterogeneity in socioeconomic conditions. To analyze the differences in influencing factors on carbon...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zheng Wang, Kangkang Gu, Hu Yu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-01-01
Series:Atmosphere
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/16/1/80
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832589122971107328
author Zheng Wang
Kangkang Gu
Hu Yu
author_facet Zheng Wang
Kangkang Gu
Hu Yu
author_sort Zheng Wang
collection DOAJ
description Cities are of wide concern to scholars due to their major share of global carbon emissions. Energy-related carbon emissions differ significantly among cities, especially megacities, due to regional heterogeneity in socioeconomic conditions. To analyze the differences in influencing factors on carbon emissions within megacities, and further target emission reductions, measures were developed. Beijing was selected to investigate influencing factor differences in the core zones, developing zones and ecological zones using the STIRPAT model on the county level. The results show the following: (1) Regional heterogeneity existed in Beijing in carbon emissions changes from 2010 to 2022. The carbon emissions of the core zones grew steadily and were demonstrated as a major part of Beijing. (2) There were variations in the influencing factors of emissions. Population size was the major driving factor of emissions in the core zones, while emissions in the developing zones and ecological zones were driven primarily by GDP per capita. Notably, urbanization promoted the increase in carbon emissions in the developing zones, but had a negative influence on emissions in the ecological zones. The energy intensity was the primary negative force of carbon emissions in the three zones. (3) The differences in population, economic scale, industrial structure and technological level lead to the heterogeneity of carbon emissions in Beijing. The three zones should formulate targeted emission reduction measures based on the primary factors of carbon emissions and their functional positioning.
format Article
id doaj-art-744c3723d44645d6b90a14a02a83db3a
institution Kabale University
issn 2073-4433
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Atmosphere
spelling doaj-art-744c3723d44645d6b90a14a02a83db3a2025-01-24T13:21:57ZengMDPI AGAtmosphere2073-44332025-01-011618010.3390/atmos16010080The Internal Heterogeneity of Carbon Emissions in Megacities: A Case Study of Beijing, ChinaZheng Wang0Kangkang Gu1Hu Yu2School of Architecture & Planning, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei 230022, ChinaSchool of Architecture & Planning, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei 230022, ChinaInstitute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, ChinaCities are of wide concern to scholars due to their major share of global carbon emissions. Energy-related carbon emissions differ significantly among cities, especially megacities, due to regional heterogeneity in socioeconomic conditions. To analyze the differences in influencing factors on carbon emissions within megacities, and further target emission reductions, measures were developed. Beijing was selected to investigate influencing factor differences in the core zones, developing zones and ecological zones using the STIRPAT model on the county level. The results show the following: (1) Regional heterogeneity existed in Beijing in carbon emissions changes from 2010 to 2022. The carbon emissions of the core zones grew steadily and were demonstrated as a major part of Beijing. (2) There were variations in the influencing factors of emissions. Population size was the major driving factor of emissions in the core zones, while emissions in the developing zones and ecological zones were driven primarily by GDP per capita. Notably, urbanization promoted the increase in carbon emissions in the developing zones, but had a negative influence on emissions in the ecological zones. The energy intensity was the primary negative force of carbon emissions in the three zones. (3) The differences in population, economic scale, industrial structure and technological level lead to the heterogeneity of carbon emissions in Beijing. The three zones should formulate targeted emission reduction measures based on the primary factors of carbon emissions and their functional positioning.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/16/1/80carbon emissionsinfluencing factorsinternal heterogeneityridge regressionBeijing
spellingShingle Zheng Wang
Kangkang Gu
Hu Yu
The Internal Heterogeneity of Carbon Emissions in Megacities: A Case Study of Beijing, China
Atmosphere
carbon emissions
influencing factors
internal heterogeneity
ridge regression
Beijing
title The Internal Heterogeneity of Carbon Emissions in Megacities: A Case Study of Beijing, China
title_full The Internal Heterogeneity of Carbon Emissions in Megacities: A Case Study of Beijing, China
title_fullStr The Internal Heterogeneity of Carbon Emissions in Megacities: A Case Study of Beijing, China
title_full_unstemmed The Internal Heterogeneity of Carbon Emissions in Megacities: A Case Study of Beijing, China
title_short The Internal Heterogeneity of Carbon Emissions in Megacities: A Case Study of Beijing, China
title_sort internal heterogeneity of carbon emissions in megacities a case study of beijing china
topic carbon emissions
influencing factors
internal heterogeneity
ridge regression
Beijing
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/16/1/80
work_keys_str_mv AT zhengwang theinternalheterogeneityofcarbonemissionsinmegacitiesacasestudyofbeijingchina
AT kangkanggu theinternalheterogeneityofcarbonemissionsinmegacitiesacasestudyofbeijingchina
AT huyu theinternalheterogeneityofcarbonemissionsinmegacitiesacasestudyofbeijingchina
AT zhengwang internalheterogeneityofcarbonemissionsinmegacitiesacasestudyofbeijingchina
AT kangkanggu internalheterogeneityofcarbonemissionsinmegacitiesacasestudyofbeijingchina
AT huyu internalheterogeneityofcarbonemissionsinmegacitiesacasestudyofbeijingchina