Milky Way Dark Matter Distribution or MOND Test from Vertical Stellar Kinematics with Gaia DR3

Vertical stellar kinematics+density can be used to trace the dark matter distribution (or the equivalent phantom mass in a Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND) scenario) through the Jeans equations. In this paper, we want to improve this type of analysis by making use of the recent data of the 6D info...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Martín López-Corredoira
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2024-01-01
Series:The Astrophysical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad94f5
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850119987268681728
author Martín López-Corredoira
author_facet Martín López-Corredoira
author_sort Martín López-Corredoira
collection DOAJ
description Vertical stellar kinematics+density can be used to trace the dark matter distribution (or the equivalent phantom mass in a Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND) scenario) through the Jeans equations. In this paper, we want to improve this type of analysis by making use of the recent data of the 6D information from the Gaia DR3 survey in the anticenter and the Galactic poles to obtain the dynamical mass distribution near plane regions, including extended kinematics over a wide region of 8 kpc < R < 22 kpc, ∣ z ∣ < 3 kpc. Our conclusions are as follows: (i) the model of the spherical dark matter halos and the MOND model are compatible with the data; (ii) the model of the disky matter (with density proportional to the gas density) is excluded; (iii) the total lack of dark matter (there is only visible matter) within Newtonian gravity is compatible with the data; for instance, at solar Galactocentric radius, we obtained Σ = 39 ± 18 M _⊙ pc ^−2 for z = 1.05 kpc, compatible with the expected value for visible matter alone of 44 M _⊙ pc ^−2 , thus allowing zero dark matter. Similarly, for R > R _⊙ , z = 1.05 kpc, Σ = 28.7 ± 9.6, 23.0 ± 5.7, 16.9 ± 5.8, and 11.4 ± 6.6 M _⊙ pc ^−2 , respectively, for R = 10, 13, 16, and 19 kpc, compatible with visible matter alone. Larger error bars in comparison with previous works are not due to worse data or a more awkward technique but to a stricter modeling of the stellar distribution.
format Article
id doaj-art-73f27e75ee8246c19dda0d4c5c333e21
institution OA Journals
issn 1538-4357
language English
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format Article
series The Astrophysical Journal
spelling doaj-art-73f27e75ee8246c19dda0d4c5c333e212025-08-20T02:35:30ZengIOP PublishingThe Astrophysical Journal1538-43572024-01-0197814510.3847/1538-4357/ad94f5Milky Way Dark Matter Distribution or MOND Test from Vertical Stellar Kinematics with Gaia DR3Martín López-Corredoira0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6128-6274Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias , E-38205 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain ; martin@lopez-corredoira.com; PIFI-Visiting Scientist 2023 of Chinese Academy of Sciences at Purple Mountain Observatory , Nanjing 210023, and National Astronomical Observatories, Beijing 100012, People's Republic of China ​; Departamento de Astrofisica, Universidad de La Laguna , E-38206 La Laguna, Tenerife, SpainVertical stellar kinematics+density can be used to trace the dark matter distribution (or the equivalent phantom mass in a Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND) scenario) through the Jeans equations. In this paper, we want to improve this type of analysis by making use of the recent data of the 6D information from the Gaia DR3 survey in the anticenter and the Galactic poles to obtain the dynamical mass distribution near plane regions, including extended kinematics over a wide region of 8 kpc < R < 22 kpc, ∣ z ∣ < 3 kpc. Our conclusions are as follows: (i) the model of the spherical dark matter halos and the MOND model are compatible with the data; (ii) the model of the disky matter (with density proportional to the gas density) is excluded; (iii) the total lack of dark matter (there is only visible matter) within Newtonian gravity is compatible with the data; for instance, at solar Galactocentric radius, we obtained Σ = 39 ± 18 M _⊙ pc ^−2 for z = 1.05 kpc, compatible with the expected value for visible matter alone of 44 M _⊙ pc ^−2 , thus allowing zero dark matter. Similarly, for R > R _⊙ , z = 1.05 kpc, Σ = 28.7 ± 9.6, 23.0 ± 5.7, 16.9 ± 5.8, and 11.4 ± 6.6 M _⊙ pc ^−2 , respectively, for R = 10, 13, 16, and 19 kpc, compatible with visible matter alone. Larger error bars in comparison with previous works are not due to worse data or a more awkward technique but to a stricter modeling of the stellar distribution.https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad94f5Stellar kinematicsGalaxy dynamicsDark matterMilky Way disk
spellingShingle Martín López-Corredoira
Milky Way Dark Matter Distribution or MOND Test from Vertical Stellar Kinematics with Gaia DR3
The Astrophysical Journal
Stellar kinematics
Galaxy dynamics
Dark matter
Milky Way disk
title Milky Way Dark Matter Distribution or MOND Test from Vertical Stellar Kinematics with Gaia DR3
title_full Milky Way Dark Matter Distribution or MOND Test from Vertical Stellar Kinematics with Gaia DR3
title_fullStr Milky Way Dark Matter Distribution or MOND Test from Vertical Stellar Kinematics with Gaia DR3
title_full_unstemmed Milky Way Dark Matter Distribution or MOND Test from Vertical Stellar Kinematics with Gaia DR3
title_short Milky Way Dark Matter Distribution or MOND Test from Vertical Stellar Kinematics with Gaia DR3
title_sort milky way dark matter distribution or mond test from vertical stellar kinematics with gaia dr3
topic Stellar kinematics
Galaxy dynamics
Dark matter
Milky Way disk
url https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad94f5
work_keys_str_mv AT martinlopezcorredoira milkywaydarkmatterdistributionormondtestfromverticalstellarkinematicswithgaiadr3