Why is Antonovsky's sense of coherence not correlated to physical health? Analysing Antonovsky's 29-item sense of coherence scale (SOC-29)

We have previously concluded that the use of the Antonovsky sense of coherence (SOC) scale was unable to document a predicted strong association between SOC and physical health. By way of statistical methods, numerous studies have investigated the validity, reliability and applicability of the SOC s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Trine Flensborg-Madsen, Søren Ventegodt, Joav Merrick
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2005-01-01
Series:The Scientific World Journal
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2005.89
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832550761094971392
author Trine Flensborg-Madsen
Søren Ventegodt
Joav Merrick
author_facet Trine Flensborg-Madsen
Søren Ventegodt
Joav Merrick
author_sort Trine Flensborg-Madsen
collection DOAJ
description We have previously concluded that the use of the Antonovsky sense of coherence (SOC) scale was unable to document a predicted strong association between SOC and physical health. By way of statistical methods, numerous studies have investigated the validity, reliability and applicability of the SOC scale with positive results. However, this paper analyses whether the questions in the SOC scale actually represent the universe of factors necessary to describe the phenomenon of SOC, which we believe is an important supplement to the statistically means of investigating validity and reliability. In this paper we explore the idea, the concepts, the theory and the operationalisation behind the SOC Scale. The conclusions are: 1) it seems that Antonovsky's basic idea of coherence, for which he coined the term sense of coherence, as the basis for the highly popular salutogenic orientation is outstandingly good, in spite of the lack of statistical evidence; 2) the chosen key explanatory concepts of comprehensibility, manageability, and meaning, seems to be a fair, although mental, conceptualisation of this idea; 3) Antonovsky's theory was unfortunately much less clear, as Antonovsky assumed predictability to be very important for the sense of coherence, especially for comprehensibility and manageability. This notion of predictability leaves its footprints in his operationalization of SOC into the SOC Scale. Our analysis convinced us that the SOC scale is unlikely to be a fair materialization of the idea of coherence and thus unlikely to measure SOC correctly.
format Article
id doaj-art-73e2b372e7e241009cd9af776eeea795
institution Kabale University
issn 1537-744X
language English
publishDate 2005-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series The Scientific World Journal
spelling doaj-art-73e2b372e7e241009cd9af776eeea7952025-02-03T06:05:52ZengWileyThe Scientific World Journal1537-744X2005-01-01576777610.1100/tsw.2005.89Why is Antonovsky's sense of coherence not correlated to physical health? Analysing Antonovsky's 29-item sense of coherence scale (SOC-29)Trine Flensborg-Madsen0Søren Ventegodt1Joav Merrick2The Quality of Life Research Center, Teglgårdstråde 4-8, DK-1452 Copenhagen K, DenmarkThe Quality of Life Research Center, Teglgårdstråde 4-8, DK-1452 Copenhagen K, DenmarkNational Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, IsraelWe have previously concluded that the use of the Antonovsky sense of coherence (SOC) scale was unable to document a predicted strong association between SOC and physical health. By way of statistical methods, numerous studies have investigated the validity, reliability and applicability of the SOC scale with positive results. However, this paper analyses whether the questions in the SOC scale actually represent the universe of factors necessary to describe the phenomenon of SOC, which we believe is an important supplement to the statistically means of investigating validity and reliability. In this paper we explore the idea, the concepts, the theory and the operationalisation behind the SOC Scale. The conclusions are: 1) it seems that Antonovsky's basic idea of coherence, for which he coined the term sense of coherence, as the basis for the highly popular salutogenic orientation is outstandingly good, in spite of the lack of statistical evidence; 2) the chosen key explanatory concepts of comprehensibility, manageability, and meaning, seems to be a fair, although mental, conceptualisation of this idea; 3) Antonovsky's theory was unfortunately much less clear, as Antonovsky assumed predictability to be very important for the sense of coherence, especially for comprehensibility and manageability. This notion of predictability leaves its footprints in his operationalization of SOC into the SOC Scale. Our analysis convinced us that the SOC scale is unlikely to be a fair materialization of the idea of coherence and thus unlikely to measure SOC correctly.http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2005.89
spellingShingle Trine Flensborg-Madsen
Søren Ventegodt
Joav Merrick
Why is Antonovsky's sense of coherence not correlated to physical health? Analysing Antonovsky's 29-item sense of coherence scale (SOC-29)
The Scientific World Journal
title Why is Antonovsky's sense of coherence not correlated to physical health? Analysing Antonovsky's 29-item sense of coherence scale (SOC-29)
title_full Why is Antonovsky's sense of coherence not correlated to physical health? Analysing Antonovsky's 29-item sense of coherence scale (SOC-29)
title_fullStr Why is Antonovsky's sense of coherence not correlated to physical health? Analysing Antonovsky's 29-item sense of coherence scale (SOC-29)
title_full_unstemmed Why is Antonovsky's sense of coherence not correlated to physical health? Analysing Antonovsky's 29-item sense of coherence scale (SOC-29)
title_short Why is Antonovsky's sense of coherence not correlated to physical health? Analysing Antonovsky's 29-item sense of coherence scale (SOC-29)
title_sort why is antonovsky s sense of coherence not correlated to physical health analysing antonovsky s 29 item sense of coherence scale soc 29
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2005.89
work_keys_str_mv AT trineflensborgmadsen whyisantonovskyssenseofcoherencenotcorrelatedtophysicalhealthanalysingantonovskys29itemsenseofcoherencescalesoc29
AT sørenventegodt whyisantonovskyssenseofcoherencenotcorrelatedtophysicalhealthanalysingantonovskys29itemsenseofcoherencescalesoc29
AT joavmerrick whyisantonovskyssenseofcoherencenotcorrelatedtophysicalhealthanalysingantonovskys29itemsenseofcoherencescalesoc29