Comparison of Exercise Intensity Based on Anaerobic Threshold on Fatigue in Men with Low Activity

Background: A sedentary lifestyle can result in excessive fatigue. Aerobic exercise improves cardiorespiratory fitness, physical activity, and fatigue. Cardiorespiratory exercise testing (CPET) is the most appropriate and effective tool for prescribing exercise programs. Objective: To compare the ef...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mela Kurnia Widyarini, Tanti Ajoe Kesoema, Robby Tjandra
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro 2025-01-01
Series:Jurnal Kedokteran Diponegoro
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/medico/article/view/47026
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850169433783271424
author Mela Kurnia Widyarini
Tanti Ajoe Kesoema
Robby Tjandra
author_facet Mela Kurnia Widyarini
Tanti Ajoe Kesoema
Robby Tjandra
author_sort Mela Kurnia Widyarini
collection DOAJ
description Background: A sedentary lifestyle can result in excessive fatigue. Aerobic exercise improves cardiorespiratory fitness, physical activity, and fatigue. Cardiorespiratory exercise testing (CPET) is the most appropriate and effective tool for prescribing exercise programs. Objective: To compare the effect of exercise at an intensity above and below the anaerobic threshold (AT) on fatigue men with low activity. Methods: This study was an experimental single-blinded control trial with a pre-post design. There were 24 participants divided into two groups: group A (n = 12) received intensity training above the AT, and group B (n = 12) received intensity training below the AT. Both groups received treadmill aerobic exercises three times a week for 4 weeks. Fatigue levels were measured with the Fatigue Severity Scale questionnaire at the beginning and end of fourth week of intervention. Results: After four weeks, there was a significant improvement in fatigue levels in both the A group (p = 0.002) and the B group (p = 0.002). There was no statistically significant difference between the A group (-6.58 ± 5.62) and the B group (-4.67 ± 5.87) (p = 0.265). Conclusion: Both exercise intensity above and below the AT within 4 weeks showed improvement on fatigue level in men with low activity. Exercise intensity above AT was not superior compared to exercise intensity below AT in improving fatigue levels.
format Article
id doaj-art-73750fe9468449c2a8b13158ada7a16c
institution OA Journals
issn 2540-8844
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro
record_format Article
series Jurnal Kedokteran Diponegoro
spelling doaj-art-73750fe9468449c2a8b13158ada7a16c2025-08-20T02:20:44ZengFaculty of Medicine, Universitas DiponegoroJurnal Kedokteran Diponegoro2540-88442025-01-01141222810.14710/dmj.v14i1.4702633013Comparison of Exercise Intensity Based on Anaerobic Threshold on Fatigue in Men with Low ActivityMela Kurnia Widyarini0Tanti Ajoe Kesoema1Robby Tjandra2Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine Diponegoro University, IndonesiaPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation Study Programme, Universitas Diponegoro, Jl. Prof. Sudarto, SH, Tembalang, Semarang, Indonesia 50275, IndonesiaDr. Kariadi General Hospital, Semarang, Indonesia, IndonesiaBackground: A sedentary lifestyle can result in excessive fatigue. Aerobic exercise improves cardiorespiratory fitness, physical activity, and fatigue. Cardiorespiratory exercise testing (CPET) is the most appropriate and effective tool for prescribing exercise programs. Objective: To compare the effect of exercise at an intensity above and below the anaerobic threshold (AT) on fatigue men with low activity. Methods: This study was an experimental single-blinded control trial with a pre-post design. There were 24 participants divided into two groups: group A (n = 12) received intensity training above the AT, and group B (n = 12) received intensity training below the AT. Both groups received treadmill aerobic exercises three times a week for 4 weeks. Fatigue levels were measured with the Fatigue Severity Scale questionnaire at the beginning and end of fourth week of intervention. Results: After four weeks, there was a significant improvement in fatigue levels in both the A group (p = 0.002) and the B group (p = 0.002). There was no statistically significant difference between the A group (-6.58 ± 5.62) and the B group (-4.67 ± 5.87) (p = 0.265). Conclusion: Both exercise intensity above and below the AT within 4 weeks showed improvement on fatigue level in men with low activity. Exercise intensity above AT was not superior compared to exercise intensity below AT in improving fatigue levels.https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/medico/article/view/47026anaerobic threshold, cpet, fatigue severity scale, men in low activity
spellingShingle Mela Kurnia Widyarini
Tanti Ajoe Kesoema
Robby Tjandra
Comparison of Exercise Intensity Based on Anaerobic Threshold on Fatigue in Men with Low Activity
Jurnal Kedokteran Diponegoro
anaerobic threshold, cpet, fatigue severity scale, men in low activity
title Comparison of Exercise Intensity Based on Anaerobic Threshold on Fatigue in Men with Low Activity
title_full Comparison of Exercise Intensity Based on Anaerobic Threshold on Fatigue in Men with Low Activity
title_fullStr Comparison of Exercise Intensity Based on Anaerobic Threshold on Fatigue in Men with Low Activity
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Exercise Intensity Based on Anaerobic Threshold on Fatigue in Men with Low Activity
title_short Comparison of Exercise Intensity Based on Anaerobic Threshold on Fatigue in Men with Low Activity
title_sort comparison of exercise intensity based on anaerobic threshold on fatigue in men with low activity
topic anaerobic threshold, cpet, fatigue severity scale, men in low activity
url https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/medico/article/view/47026
work_keys_str_mv AT melakurniawidyarini comparisonofexerciseintensitybasedonanaerobicthresholdonfatigueinmenwithlowactivity
AT tantiajoekesoema comparisonofexerciseintensitybasedonanaerobicthresholdonfatigueinmenwithlowactivity
AT robbytjandra comparisonofexerciseintensitybasedonanaerobicthresholdonfatigueinmenwithlowactivity