How to Affect the Number of Images on the Success Rate for Detection of Weeds with Deep Learning
The detection of weeds with computer vision without the help of an expert is important for scientific studies and other purposes. The images used for the detection of weeds are recorded under controlled conditions and used in image processing-deep learning methods. In this study, the images of 3-4-l...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Hasan Eleroğlu
2022-08-01
|
| Series: | Turkish Journal of Agriculture: Food Science and Technology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.agrifoodscience.com/index.php/TURJAF/article/view/5183 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849414537243000832 |
|---|---|
| author | Mustafa Guzel Bulent Turan Izzet Kadioglu Bahadir Sin Alper Basturk Khaled R. Ahmed |
| author_facet | Mustafa Guzel Bulent Turan Izzet Kadioglu Bahadir Sin Alper Basturk Khaled R. Ahmed |
| author_sort | Mustafa Guzel |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The detection of weeds with computer vision without the help of an expert is important for scientific studies and other purposes. The images used for the detection of weeds are recorded under controlled conditions and used in image processing-deep learning methods. In this study, the images of 3-4-leaf (true-leaf) periods of the wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis) plant, which is the critical process for chemical control, were recorded from its natural environment by a drone. The datasets were included 50-100-250-500 and 1 000 raw images and were augmented by image preprocessing methods. Totally 12 different augmentation methods used and datasets were examined for understand how to affects the numbers of images on training-validation performance. YOLOv5 was used as a deep learning method and results of the datasets were evaluated with the Confusion Matrix, Metrics-Precision, and Train-Object Loss. For results of Confusion Matrix where 1 000 images gave the highest results with TP (True Positive) 80% and FP (False Positive) 20%. The TP-FP ratios of 500, 250, 100 and 50 image numbers were respectively; 65%-35%, 43%-57%, 0%-100% and 0%-100%. With 100 and 50 images, the system did not show any TP success. The highest metrics-precision ratio was found 92.52% for 1 000 images set and for 500 and 250 image sets respectively; 88.34% and 79.87%. The 100 and 50 images datasets did not show any metrics-precision ratio. The minimum object loss ratio was 5% at 50th epochs in the 100 images dataset. This dataset was followed by other 50, 250, 500, and 1 000 images respectively; 5.4%, 6.14%, 6.16%, and 8.07%. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-7355df97c0c04747a0db4fa8c2f71901 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2148-127X |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2022-08-01 |
| publisher | Hasan Eleroğlu |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Turkish Journal of Agriculture: Food Science and Technology |
| spelling | doaj-art-7355df97c0c04747a0db4fa8c2f719012025-08-20T03:33:49ZengHasan EleroğluTurkish Journal of Agriculture: Food Science and Technology2148-127X2022-08-011081441144610.24925/turjaf.v10i8.1441-1446.51832557How to Affect the Number of Images on the Success Rate for Detection of Weeds with Deep LearningMustafa Guzel0Bulent Turan1Izzet Kadioglu2Bahadir Sin3Alper Basturk4Khaled R. Ahmed5Department of Plant, Soil, and Agricultural Systems, Southern Illinois University, CarbondaleFaculty of Engineering and Natural Science, Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa University, 60250 TokatAnamur/MersinFaculty of Agriculture, Sakarya University of Applied Science, 54050 SakaryaFaculty of Engineering, Erciyes University, 38039 KayseriSchool of Computing, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, ILThe detection of weeds with computer vision without the help of an expert is important for scientific studies and other purposes. The images used for the detection of weeds are recorded under controlled conditions and used in image processing-deep learning methods. In this study, the images of 3-4-leaf (true-leaf) periods of the wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis) plant, which is the critical process for chemical control, were recorded from its natural environment by a drone. The datasets were included 50-100-250-500 and 1 000 raw images and were augmented by image preprocessing methods. Totally 12 different augmentation methods used and datasets were examined for understand how to affects the numbers of images on training-validation performance. YOLOv5 was used as a deep learning method and results of the datasets were evaluated with the Confusion Matrix, Metrics-Precision, and Train-Object Loss. For results of Confusion Matrix where 1 000 images gave the highest results with TP (True Positive) 80% and FP (False Positive) 20%. The TP-FP ratios of 500, 250, 100 and 50 image numbers were respectively; 65%-35%, 43%-57%, 0%-100% and 0%-100%. With 100 and 50 images, the system did not show any TP success. The highest metrics-precision ratio was found 92.52% for 1 000 images set and for 500 and 250 image sets respectively; 88.34% and 79.87%. The 100 and 50 images datasets did not show any metrics-precision ratio. The minimum object loss ratio was 5% at 50th epochs in the 100 images dataset. This dataset was followed by other 50, 250, 500, and 1 000 images respectively; 5.4%, 6.14%, 6.16%, and 8.07%.http://www.agrifoodscience.com/index.php/TURJAF/article/view/5183weed detectiondeep learningreal time detectionsinapis arvensisconfusion matrix |
| spellingShingle | Mustafa Guzel Bulent Turan Izzet Kadioglu Bahadir Sin Alper Basturk Khaled R. Ahmed How to Affect the Number of Images on the Success Rate for Detection of Weeds with Deep Learning Turkish Journal of Agriculture: Food Science and Technology weed detection deep learning real time detection sinapis arvensis confusion matrix |
| title | How to Affect the Number of Images on the Success Rate for Detection of Weeds with Deep Learning |
| title_full | How to Affect the Number of Images on the Success Rate for Detection of Weeds with Deep Learning |
| title_fullStr | How to Affect the Number of Images on the Success Rate for Detection of Weeds with Deep Learning |
| title_full_unstemmed | How to Affect the Number of Images on the Success Rate for Detection of Weeds with Deep Learning |
| title_short | How to Affect the Number of Images on the Success Rate for Detection of Weeds with Deep Learning |
| title_sort | how to affect the number of images on the success rate for detection of weeds with deep learning |
| topic | weed detection deep learning real time detection sinapis arvensis confusion matrix |
| url | http://www.agrifoodscience.com/index.php/TURJAF/article/view/5183 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mustafaguzel howtoaffectthenumberofimagesonthesuccessratefordetectionofweedswithdeeplearning AT bulentturan howtoaffectthenumberofimagesonthesuccessratefordetectionofweedswithdeeplearning AT izzetkadioglu howtoaffectthenumberofimagesonthesuccessratefordetectionofweedswithdeeplearning AT bahadirsin howtoaffectthenumberofimagesonthesuccessratefordetectionofweedswithdeeplearning AT alperbasturk howtoaffectthenumberofimagesonthesuccessratefordetectionofweedswithdeeplearning AT khaledrahmed howtoaffectthenumberofimagesonthesuccessratefordetectionofweedswithdeeplearning |