Multiethnic Perspectives of Shared Decision‐Making in Hypertension: A Mixed‐Methods Study

Background Shared decision‐making (SDM) has the potential to improve hypertension care quality and equity. However, research lacks diverse representation and evidence about how race and ethnicity affect SDM. Therefore, this study aims to explore SDM in the context of hypertension management. Methods...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sabrina Elias, Jennifer Wenzel, Lisa A. Cooper, Nancy Perrin, Yvonne Commodore‐Mensah, Krystina B. Lewis, Binu Koirala, Sarah Slone, Samuel Byiringiro, Jill Marsteller, Cheryl R. Himmelfarb
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-07-01
Series:Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.123.032568
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background Shared decision‐making (SDM) has the potential to improve hypertension care quality and equity. However, research lacks diverse representation and evidence about how race and ethnicity affect SDM. Therefore, this study aims to explore SDM in the context of hypertension management. Methods and Results Explanatory sequential mixed‐methods design was used. Quantitative data were sourced at baseline and 12‐month follow up from RICH LIFE (Reducing Inequities in Care of Hypertension: Lifestyle Improvement for Everyone) participants (n=1212) with hypertension. Qualitative data were collected from semistructured individual interviews, at 12‐month follow‐up, with participants (n=36) selected based on their SDM scores and blood pressure outcome. Patients were cross‐ categorized based on high or low SDM scores and systolic blood pressure reduction of ≥10 or <10 mm Hg. Multinomial logistic regression analysis showed that predictors of SDM scores and blood pressure outcome were race and ethnicity (relative risk ratio [RRR], 1.64; P=0.029), age (RRR, 1.03; P=0.002), educational level (RRR, 1.87; P=0.016), patient activation (RRR, 0.98; P<0.001; RRR, 0.99; P=0.039), and hypertension knowledge (RRR, 2.2; P<0.001; and RRR, 1.57; P=0.045). Qualitative and mixed‐methods findings highlight that provider–patient communication and relationship influenced SDM, being emphasized both as facilitators and barriers. Other facilitators were patients' understanding of hypertension; clinicians' interest in the patient, and clinicians' personality and attitudes; and barriers included perceived lack of compassion, relationship hierarchy, and time constraints. Conclusions Participants with different SDM scores and blood pressure outcomes varied in determinants of decision and descriptions of contextual factors influencing SDM. Results provide actionable information, are novel, and expand our understanding of factors influencing SDM in hypertension.
ISSN:2047-9980