REKOGNISI PENGALAMAN PEREMPUAN: STUDI KASUS PELAKSANAAN PASAL 4 PERMA NOMOR 3 TAHUN 2017
Article 4 Supreme Court Regulation (Perma) No. 3 of 2017 on Guidelines for Judging Cases of Women in Conflict with the Law determines that judges should consider gender equality and non-discrimination, by identifying the facts in court hearing. The research question is to what extent the implementat...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Universitas Brawijaya
2023-04-01
|
| Series: | Arena Hukum |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arenahukum.ub.ac.id/index.php/arena/article/view/1471 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850196303711043584 |
|---|---|
| author | Rika Saraswati |
| author_facet | Rika Saraswati |
| author_sort | Rika Saraswati |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
Article 4 Supreme Court Regulation (Perma) No. 3 of 2017 on Guidelines for Judging Cases of Women in Conflict with the Law determines that judges should consider gender equality and non-discrimination, by identifying the facts in court hearing. The research question is to what extent the implementation of the article to the case under this study and its influence to the court verdict. The qualitative method is implemented in this study. The primary data collection was gathered by attending an online trial and the secondary data was obtained through a literature study by using the main documents of an infanticide case namely: the case file No. Pol: Bp/01/I/2020/Reskrim and the court decision No.37/Pid.B/2020/PN.Pwd. The result has demonstrated that judges had applied article 4 of PERMA during the court hearing. Judges’ considerations have recognized the experience of the woman perpetrator as the victim of sexual violence; however, judges insisted their decision on the basis of the actions of the perpetrator and ignored the psychological, sociological and imbalance power relations factors which were experienced by the woman.
|
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-72f78b189165457da3aa2e8924d554e4 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 0126-0235 2527-4406 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2023-04-01 |
| publisher | Universitas Brawijaya |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Arena Hukum |
| spelling | doaj-art-72f78b189165457da3aa2e8924d554e42025-08-20T02:13:31ZengUniversitas BrawijayaArena Hukum0126-02352527-44062023-04-0116110.21776/ub.arenahukum.2023.01601.4REKOGNISI PENGALAMAN PEREMPUAN: STUDI KASUS PELAKSANAAN PASAL 4 PERMA NOMOR 3 TAHUN 2017Rika Saraswati0Universitas Katolik Soegijapranata Article 4 Supreme Court Regulation (Perma) No. 3 of 2017 on Guidelines for Judging Cases of Women in Conflict with the Law determines that judges should consider gender equality and non-discrimination, by identifying the facts in court hearing. The research question is to what extent the implementation of the article to the case under this study and its influence to the court verdict. The qualitative method is implemented in this study. The primary data collection was gathered by attending an online trial and the secondary data was obtained through a literature study by using the main documents of an infanticide case namely: the case file No. Pol: Bp/01/I/2020/Reskrim and the court decision No.37/Pid.B/2020/PN.Pwd. The result has demonstrated that judges had applied article 4 of PERMA during the court hearing. Judges’ considerations have recognized the experience of the woman perpetrator as the victim of sexual violence; however, judges insisted their decision on the basis of the actions of the perpetrator and ignored the psychological, sociological and imbalance power relations factors which were experienced by the woman. https://arenahukum.ub.ac.id/index.php/arena/article/view/1471ExperienceLawRecognitionWomen |
| spellingShingle | Rika Saraswati REKOGNISI PENGALAMAN PEREMPUAN: STUDI KASUS PELAKSANAAN PASAL 4 PERMA NOMOR 3 TAHUN 2017 Arena Hukum Experience Law Recognition Women |
| title | REKOGNISI PENGALAMAN PEREMPUAN: STUDI KASUS PELAKSANAAN PASAL 4 PERMA NOMOR 3 TAHUN 2017 |
| title_full | REKOGNISI PENGALAMAN PEREMPUAN: STUDI KASUS PELAKSANAAN PASAL 4 PERMA NOMOR 3 TAHUN 2017 |
| title_fullStr | REKOGNISI PENGALAMAN PEREMPUAN: STUDI KASUS PELAKSANAAN PASAL 4 PERMA NOMOR 3 TAHUN 2017 |
| title_full_unstemmed | REKOGNISI PENGALAMAN PEREMPUAN: STUDI KASUS PELAKSANAAN PASAL 4 PERMA NOMOR 3 TAHUN 2017 |
| title_short | REKOGNISI PENGALAMAN PEREMPUAN: STUDI KASUS PELAKSANAAN PASAL 4 PERMA NOMOR 3 TAHUN 2017 |
| title_sort | rekognisi pengalaman perempuan studi kasus pelaksanaan pasal 4 perma nomor 3 tahun 2017 |
| topic | Experience Law Recognition Women |
| url | https://arenahukum.ub.ac.id/index.php/arena/article/view/1471 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT rikasaraswati rekognisipengalamanperempuanstudikasuspelaksanaanpasal4permanomor3tahun2017 |