Macroecology meets IPBES

<p>The Intergovernmental Platform for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), established in 2012 to counter the biodiversity crisis, requires the best scientific input available to function as a successful science-policy interface that addresses the knowledge needs of governments for saf...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christian Hof, D. Matthias Dehling, Aletta Bonn, Neil D. Burgess, Felix Eigenbrod, Michael B. J. Harfoot, Thomas Hickler, Walter Jetz, Elisabeth Marquard, Henrique M. Pereira, Katrin Böhning-Gaese
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Pensoft Publishers 2016-01-01
Series:Frontiers of Biogeography
Subjects:
Online Access:http://escholarship.org/uc/item/93k7n8w2
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850258220742868992
author Christian Hof
D. Matthias Dehling
Aletta Bonn
Neil D. Burgess
Felix Eigenbrod
Michael B. J. Harfoot
Thomas Hickler
Walter Jetz
Elisabeth Marquard
Henrique M. Pereira
Katrin Böhning-Gaese
author_facet Christian Hof
D. Matthias Dehling
Aletta Bonn
Neil D. Burgess
Felix Eigenbrod
Michael B. J. Harfoot
Thomas Hickler
Walter Jetz
Elisabeth Marquard
Henrique M. Pereira
Katrin Böhning-Gaese
author_sort Christian Hof
collection DOAJ
description <p>The Intergovernmental Platform for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), established in 2012 to counter the biodiversity crisis, requires the best scientific input available to function as a successful science-policy interface that addresses the knowledge needs of governments for safeguarding nature and its services. For the macroecological research community, IPBES presents a great opportunity to contribute knowledge, data and methods, and to help identify and address knowledge gaps and methodological impediments. Here, we outline our perspectives on how macroecology may contribute to IPBES. We focus on three essential topics for the IPBES process, where contributions by macroecologists will be invaluable: biodiversity data, biodiversity modelling, and modelling of ecosystem services. For each topic, we discuss the potential for contributions from the macroecological community, as well as limitations, challenges, and knowledge gaps. Overall, engagement of the macroecological community with IPBES should lead to mutual benefits. Macroecologists may profit as their contributions to IPBES may strengthen and inspire them as a community to design and conduct research that provides society-relevant results. Furthermore, macroecological contributions will help IPBES become a successful instrument of knowledge exchange and uncover the linkages between biodiversity and human well-being.</p>
format Article
id doaj-art-72de9ba2d30c41f2a2bca3c0df92768b
institution OA Journals
issn 1948-6596
language English
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Pensoft Publishers
record_format Article
series Frontiers of Biogeography
spelling doaj-art-72de9ba2d30c41f2a2bca3c0df92768b2025-08-20T01:56:13ZengPensoft PublishersFrontiers of Biogeography1948-65962016-01-0174ark:13030/qt93k7n8w2Macroecology meets IPBESChristian Hof0D. Matthias Dehling1Aletta Bonn2Neil D. Burgess3Felix Eigenbrod4Michael B. J. Harfoot5Thomas Hickler6Walter Jetz7Elisabeth Marquard8Henrique M. Pereira9Katrin Böhning-Gaese10Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research CentreSenckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research CentreDepartment of Ecosystem Services, UFZ – Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Permoserstr. 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany. Institute of Ecology, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Dornburger-Str. 159, 07743 Jena, Germany. German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Deutscher Platz 5e, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.UNEP-WCMC, 219 Huntington Road, Cambridge, CB3 0DL, UK. Center for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate, Natural History Museum of Denmark, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.Centre for Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK.UNEP-WCMC, 219 Huntington Road, Cambridge, CB3 0DL, UK.Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (BiK-F), Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung, 60325 Frankfurt (Main), Germany. Department of Geosciences and Geography, Goethe University, 60438 Frankfurt (Main), Germany.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, 165 Prospect Street, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.Department of Conservation Biology, UFZ – Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Permoserstr. 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany.German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Deutscher Platz 5e, 04103 Leipzig, Germany. Institute of Biology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Am Kirchtor 1, 06108 Halle (Saale), Germany. Infraestruturas de Portugal Biodiversity Chair, CiBiO/InBIO, Universidade do Porto, 4485-661 Vairão, Portugal.Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (BiK-F), Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung, 60325 Frankfurt (Main), Germany. Department of Biological Sciences, Goethe University, 60438 Frankfurt (Main), Germany<p>The Intergovernmental Platform for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), established in 2012 to counter the biodiversity crisis, requires the best scientific input available to function as a successful science-policy interface that addresses the knowledge needs of governments for safeguarding nature and its services. For the macroecological research community, IPBES presents a great opportunity to contribute knowledge, data and methods, and to help identify and address knowledge gaps and methodological impediments. Here, we outline our perspectives on how macroecology may contribute to IPBES. We focus on three essential topics for the IPBES process, where contributions by macroecologists will be invaluable: biodiversity data, biodiversity modelling, and modelling of ecosystem services. For each topic, we discuss the potential for contributions from the macroecological community, as well as limitations, challenges, and knowledge gaps. Overall, engagement of the macroecological community with IPBES should lead to mutual benefits. Macroecologists may profit as their contributions to IPBES may strengthen and inspire them as a community to design and conduct research that provides society-relevant results. Furthermore, macroecological contributions will help IPBES become a successful instrument of knowledge exchange and uncover the linkages between biodiversity and human well-being.</p>http://escholarship.org/uc/item/93k7n8w2biodiversitybiodiversity dataecosystem servicesmodellingscenariosscience-policy interface
spellingShingle Christian Hof
D. Matthias Dehling
Aletta Bonn
Neil D. Burgess
Felix Eigenbrod
Michael B. J. Harfoot
Thomas Hickler
Walter Jetz
Elisabeth Marquard
Henrique M. Pereira
Katrin Böhning-Gaese
Macroecology meets IPBES
Frontiers of Biogeography
biodiversity
biodiversity data
ecosystem services
modelling
scenarios
science-policy interface
title Macroecology meets IPBES
title_full Macroecology meets IPBES
title_fullStr Macroecology meets IPBES
title_full_unstemmed Macroecology meets IPBES
title_short Macroecology meets IPBES
title_sort macroecology meets ipbes
topic biodiversity
biodiversity data
ecosystem services
modelling
scenarios
science-policy interface
url http://escholarship.org/uc/item/93k7n8w2
work_keys_str_mv AT christianhof macroecologymeetsipbes
AT dmatthiasdehling macroecologymeetsipbes
AT alettabonn macroecologymeetsipbes
AT neildburgess macroecologymeetsipbes
AT felixeigenbrod macroecologymeetsipbes
AT michaelbjharfoot macroecologymeetsipbes
AT thomashickler macroecologymeetsipbes
AT walterjetz macroecologymeetsipbes
AT elisabethmarquard macroecologymeetsipbes
AT henriquempereira macroecologymeetsipbes
AT katrinbohninggaese macroecologymeetsipbes