An in vivo rat model for comparing selective blockade between sensory and motor nerve conduction

Abstract Sensory-selective nerve blockade is highly useful for pain management in clinical practice, but developing such blockers remains challenging. A major handicap is the lack of objective in vivo animal models to evaluate motor and sensory nerve conduction simultaneously. Due to anatomical stru...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yi Teng, Xian Zou, Jin Liu, Xiangyu Hu, Cheng Zhou, Mengchan Ou
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2025-07-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-12201-5
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849235464091860992
author Yi Teng
Xian Zou
Jin Liu
Xiangyu Hu
Cheng Zhou
Mengchan Ou
author_facet Yi Teng
Xian Zou
Jin Liu
Xiangyu Hu
Cheng Zhou
Mengchan Ou
author_sort Yi Teng
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Sensory-selective nerve blockade is highly useful for pain management in clinical practice, but developing such blockers remains challenging. A major handicap is the lack of objective in vivo animal models to evaluate motor and sensory nerve conduction simultaneously. Due to anatomical structures, motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and/or somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) may be used to assess nerve conduction. MEPs were elicited by stimulating motor cortex and recorded from contralateral hind limb. SSEPs were generated by stimulating sciatic nerve and recorded from contralateral sensory cortex. Amplitude/latency changes were recorded under various physiological conditions (e.g., anesthesia, durations, temperatures, and oxygen) and drug interventions for validation. Compared to sevoflurane, propofol minimally inhibited MEPs at sedative doses and was therefore used during recordings. Both hypothermia (34–36 °C) and hyperthermia (38–40 °C) significantly suppressed MEP and SSEP amplitudes (P < 0.0001). Reduced oxygen saturation (SaO2) decreased MEP amplitudes (P < 0.0001), and the amplitudes were strongly correlated with SaO2 (R2 = 0.8284). For selective blockade validation, lidocaine suppressed both MEP and SSEP amplitudes below 20% of baseline (P < 0.0001), confirming non-selectivity. In contrast, QX-314/capsaicin selectively suppressed SSEPs (P < 0.0001), while MEPs remained stable. This model is stable for evaluating selective nerve blockade in vivo for at least 60 min under controlled physiological conditions.
format Article
id doaj-art-72dc553dad08490abda1b1c2dbeb191c
institution Kabale University
issn 2045-2322
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj-art-72dc553dad08490abda1b1c2dbeb191c2025-08-20T04:02:46ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222025-07-0115111510.1038/s41598-025-12201-5An in vivo rat model for comparing selective blockade between sensory and motor nerve conductionYi Teng0Xian Zou1Jin Liu2Xiangyu Hu3Cheng Zhou4Mengchan Ou5Department of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan UniversityDepartment of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan UniversityDepartment of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan UniversityDepartment of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan UniversityResearch Center of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan UniversityDepartment of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan UniversityAbstract Sensory-selective nerve blockade is highly useful for pain management in clinical practice, but developing such blockers remains challenging. A major handicap is the lack of objective in vivo animal models to evaluate motor and sensory nerve conduction simultaneously. Due to anatomical structures, motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and/or somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) may be used to assess nerve conduction. MEPs were elicited by stimulating motor cortex and recorded from contralateral hind limb. SSEPs were generated by stimulating sciatic nerve and recorded from contralateral sensory cortex. Amplitude/latency changes were recorded under various physiological conditions (e.g., anesthesia, durations, temperatures, and oxygen) and drug interventions for validation. Compared to sevoflurane, propofol minimally inhibited MEPs at sedative doses and was therefore used during recordings. Both hypothermia (34–36 °C) and hyperthermia (38–40 °C) significantly suppressed MEP and SSEP amplitudes (P < 0.0001). Reduced oxygen saturation (SaO2) decreased MEP amplitudes (P < 0.0001), and the amplitudes were strongly correlated with SaO2 (R2 = 0.8284). For selective blockade validation, lidocaine suppressed both MEP and SSEP amplitudes below 20% of baseline (P < 0.0001), confirming non-selectivity. In contrast, QX-314/capsaicin selectively suppressed SSEPs (P < 0.0001), while MEPs remained stable. This model is stable for evaluating selective nerve blockade in vivo for at least 60 min under controlled physiological conditions.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-12201-5Selective nerve blockadeEvoked potentialsSensory-motor separationLocal anestheticsIn vivo animal model
spellingShingle Yi Teng
Xian Zou
Jin Liu
Xiangyu Hu
Cheng Zhou
Mengchan Ou
An in vivo rat model for comparing selective blockade between sensory and motor nerve conduction
Scientific Reports
Selective nerve blockade
Evoked potentials
Sensory-motor separation
Local anesthetics
In vivo animal model
title An in vivo rat model for comparing selective blockade between sensory and motor nerve conduction
title_full An in vivo rat model for comparing selective blockade between sensory and motor nerve conduction
title_fullStr An in vivo rat model for comparing selective blockade between sensory and motor nerve conduction
title_full_unstemmed An in vivo rat model for comparing selective blockade between sensory and motor nerve conduction
title_short An in vivo rat model for comparing selective blockade between sensory and motor nerve conduction
title_sort in vivo rat model for comparing selective blockade between sensory and motor nerve conduction
topic Selective nerve blockade
Evoked potentials
Sensory-motor separation
Local anesthetics
In vivo animal model
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-12201-5
work_keys_str_mv AT yiteng aninvivoratmodelforcomparingselectiveblockadebetweensensoryandmotornerveconduction
AT xianzou aninvivoratmodelforcomparingselectiveblockadebetweensensoryandmotornerveconduction
AT jinliu aninvivoratmodelforcomparingselectiveblockadebetweensensoryandmotornerveconduction
AT xiangyuhu aninvivoratmodelforcomparingselectiveblockadebetweensensoryandmotornerveconduction
AT chengzhou aninvivoratmodelforcomparingselectiveblockadebetweensensoryandmotornerveconduction
AT mengchanou aninvivoratmodelforcomparingselectiveblockadebetweensensoryandmotornerveconduction
AT yiteng invivoratmodelforcomparingselectiveblockadebetweensensoryandmotornerveconduction
AT xianzou invivoratmodelforcomparingselectiveblockadebetweensensoryandmotornerveconduction
AT jinliu invivoratmodelforcomparingselectiveblockadebetweensensoryandmotornerveconduction
AT xiangyuhu invivoratmodelforcomparingselectiveblockadebetweensensoryandmotornerveconduction
AT chengzhou invivoratmodelforcomparingselectiveblockadebetweensensoryandmotornerveconduction
AT mengchanou invivoratmodelforcomparingselectiveblockadebetweensensoryandmotornerveconduction